Literature DB >> 27513728

Extrapolation of a non-linear autoregressive model of pulmonary mechanics.

Ruby Langdon1, Paul D Docherty2, Yeong Shiong Chiew3, J Geoffrey Chase2.   

Abstract

For patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Suboptimal PEEP levels in MV can cause ventilator induced lung injury, which is associated with increased mortality, extended ICU stay, and high cost. The ability to predict the outcome of respiratory mechanics in response to changes in PEEP would thus provide a critical advantage in personalising and improving care. Testing the potentially dangerous high pressures would not be required to assess their impact. A nonlinear autoregressive (NARX) model was used to predict airway pressure in 19 data sets from 10 mechanically ventilated ARDS patients. Patient-specific NARX models were identified from pressure and flow data over one, two, three, or four adjacent PEEP levels in a recruitment manoeuvre. Extrapolation of NARX model elastance functions allowed prediction of patient responses to PEEP changes to higher or lower pressures. NARX model predictions were more successful than those using a well validated first order model (FOM). The most clinically important results were for extrapolation up one PEEP step of 2cmH2O from the highest PEEP in the training data. When the NARX model was trained on one PEEP level, the mean RMS residual for the extrapolation PEEP level was 0.52 (90% CI: 0.47-0.57) cmH2O, compared to 1.50 (90% CI: 1.38-1.62) cmH2O for the FOM. When trained on four PEEP levels, the NARX result was 0.50 (90% CI: 0.42-0.58) cmH2O, and was 1.95 (90% CI: 1.71-2.19) cmH2O for the FOM. The results suggest that a full recruitment manoeuvre may not be required for the NARX model to obtain a useful estimate of the pressure waveform at higher PEEP levels. The methodology could thus allow clinicians to make informed decisions about ventilator PEEP settings while reducing the risk associated with high PEEP, and subsequent high peak airway pressures.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoregressive modelling; Biomedical systems; Critical care; Pulmonary modelling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27513728     DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2016.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Biosci        ISSN: 0025-5564            Impact factor:   2.144


  4 in total

1.  Quantifying neonatal patient effort using non-invasive model-based methods.

Authors:  Kyeong Tae Kim; Jennifer Knopp; Bronwyn Dixon; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Prediction of high airway pressure using a non-linear autoregressive model of pulmonary mechanics.

Authors:  Ruby Langdon; Paul D Docherty; Christoph Schranz; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuri Sun; Yuqi Liu; Neng Li; Deyuan You; Yanping Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.