Duygu Geler Külcü1, Canan Bursali2, İlknur Aktaş2, Selin Bozkurt Alp2, Feyza Ünlü Özkan2, Pınar Akpinar2. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haydarpaşa Numune Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. Conservative treatment choices are not always satisfactory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of kinesiotaping (KT) on pain level, grip strength, and functional status compared with that of placebo KT and orthotic device (OD) in patients with CTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled study, participants were allocated into one of three groups: an experimental KT group (Group 1), a placebo KT group (Group 2), and an OD group (Group 3). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) scores, dynamometric grip strength measures, and the Boston CTS questionnaire (BQ) were the outcome measures. RESULTS: All groups significantly improved in terms of VAS scores (P < 0.05), DN4 scores (P < 0.05), and BQ scores (P < 0.05). Grip strength improved in Group 3 (P = 0.001). There was a significant difference among the groups with respect to BQ scores (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: KT application for the treatment of CTS should be an alternative treatment choice.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIM: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. Conservative treatment choices are not always satisfactory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of kinesiotaping (KT) on pain level, grip strength, and functional status compared with that of placebo KT and orthotic device (OD) in patients with CTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled study, participants were allocated into one of three groups: an experimental KT group (Group 1), a placebo KT group (Group 2), and an OD group (Group 3). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) scores, dynamometric grip strength measures, and the Boston CTS questionnaire (BQ) were the outcome measures. RESULTS: All groups significantly improved in terms of VAS scores (P < 0.05), DN4 scores (P < 0.05), and BQ scores (P < 0.05). Grip strength improved in Group 3 (P = 0.001). There was a significant difference among the groups with respect to BQ scores (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: KT application for the treatment of CTS should be an alternative treatment choice.
Authors: Mar Hernández-Secorún; Raquel Montaña-Cortés; César Hidalgo-García; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Sofia Monti-Ballano; Sami Hamam-Alcober; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno; María Orosia Lucha-López Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-28 Impact factor: 3.390