Literature DB >> 27513272

An investigation of the bactericidal activity of chlorhexidine digluconateagainst multidrug-resistant hospital isolates.

Melike Ekizoğlu1, Meral Sağiroğlu1, Ekrem Kiliç1, Ayşe Gülşen Hasçelik2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hospital infections are among the most prominent medical problems around the world. Using proper biocides in an appropriate way is critically important in overcoming this problem. Several reports have suggested that microorganisms may develop resistance or reduce their susceptibility to biocides, similar to the case with antibiotics. In this study we aimed to determine the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine digluconate against clinical isolates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The susceptibility of 120 hospital isolated strains of 7 bacterial genera against chlorhexidine digluconate was determined by agar dilution test, using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and the EN 1040 Basic Bactericidal Activity Test to determine the bactericidal activity. According to MIC values, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were found to be less susceptible to chlorhexidine digluconate.
RESULTS: Quantitative suspension test results showed that 4% chlorhexidine digluconate was effective against antibiotic resistant and susceptible bacteria after 5 min of contact time and can be safely used in our hospital. However, concentrations below 4% chlorhexidine digluconate caused a decrease in bactericidal activity, especially for Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa.
CONCLUSION: It is crucial to use biocides at appropriate concentrations and to perform surveillance studies to trace resistance or low susceptibility patterns of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and other hospital isolates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocides; EN 1040; chlorhexidine digluconate; quantitative suspension test; resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27513272     DOI: 10.3906/sag-1503-140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Med Sci        ISSN: 1300-0144            Impact factor:   0.973


  6 in total

1.  Has resistance to chlorhexidine increased among clinically-relevant bacteria? A systematic review of time course and subpopulation data.

Authors:  Stephen Buxser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Assessment of disinfectant efficacy in reducing microbial growth.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alajlan; Lenah E Mukhtar; Adnan S Almussallam; Abdullah M Alnuqaydan; Nasser S Albakiri; Turki F Almutari; Khalid M Bin Shehail; Fahad S Aldawsari; Sulaiman M Alajel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Evolution of Chlorhexidine Susceptibility and of the EfrEF Operon among Enterococcus faecalis from Diverse Environments, Clones, and Time Spans.

Authors:  Ana P Pereira; Patrícia Antunes; Rob Willems; Jukka Corander; Teresa M Coque; Luísa Peixe; Ana R Freitas; Carla Novais
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 4.  The potential for developing new antimicrobial resistance from the use of medical devices containing chlorhexidine, minocycline, rifampicin and their combinations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Reitzel; Joel Rosenblatt; Bahgat Z Gerges; Andrew Jarjour; Ana Fernández-Cruz; Issam I Raad
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2020-02-21

Review 5.  Antimicrobial stewardship of antiseptics that are pertinent to wounds: the need for a united approach.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Maillard; Günter Kampf; Rose Cooper
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Chlorhexidine Bathing Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Summary of Recent Evidence.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gall; Anna Long; Kendall K Hall
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.