Literature DB >> 27512090

Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Interventions: Insights From an In Vivo Multimodality Imaging Study.

Johan Bennett1, Maarten Vanhaverbeke2, Nina Vanden Driessche2, Tom Adriaenssens2, Nick Hiltrop2, Walter Desmet2, Peter Sinnaeve2, Christophe Dubois2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bioresorbable scaffolds offer potential advantages compared with metallic drug-eluting stents in the treatment of complex coronary bifurcation lesions, there are concerns that the polymeric scaffold integrity may be compromised. This in vivo study sought to provide insights about the feasibility of performing complex bifurcation stenting with Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty New Zealand white rabbits underwent stenting of the nondiseased aortoiliac bifurcation with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds using provisional (PS, n=5), culotte (n=5), modified-T (n=5), or T-and protrusion (n=5) stenting techniques. Angiography, optical coherence tomography, and microcomputed tomography were performed. Angiographic results were excellent without evidence of dissection or side branch (SB) compromise. PS optimally opened the SB ostium without deforming the main vessel (MV) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, avoiding malapposition, and revealing a single connector fracture in 1 of 5 cases on microcomputed tomography. Culotte stenting resulted in complete bifurcation coverage with extensive segments of double-layered struts and inappropriately apposed struts at the bifurcation level in 3 of 5 cases. On microcomputed tomography, there was MV and SB scaffold distortion at the bifurcation with single strut fractures in 4 of 5 and double fractures in 1 of 5. Modified-T and T-and protrusion resulted in complete bifurcation coverage and in minimal double-strut layers at the neocarina. On microcomputed tomography, no strut fractures were present after modified-T, whereas in 3 of 5 T-and protrusion procedures single strut fractures were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Bifurcation stenting using bioresorbable vascular scaffolds is feasible with excellent angiographic results. PS with additional T-and protrusion whenever needed seems a reasonable approach. Whenever a 2-stent technique is planned, modified T-stenting appears the most promising.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiography; drug-eluting stents; optical coherence tomography; rabbits; stent

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27512090     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  2 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Stenosis: When and How Based Upon Current Studies.

Authors:  Alexandre Abizaid; J Ribamar Costa
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Coronary Artery Radial Deformation and Velocity in Native and Stented Arteries.

Authors:  Logan S Schwarzman; Decebal S Griza; Leon J Frazin; Mladen I Vidovich; Mayank M Kansal
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.