Literature DB >> 2751166

Particle size distribution of mainstream tobacco and marijuana smoke. Analysis using the electrical aerosol analyzer.

P J Anderson1, J D Wilson, F C Hiller.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of cigarette smoke particle size distribution is important for estimation of lung deposition. Most prior investigators have reported a mass median diameter (MMD) in the size range of 0.3 to 0.5 micron, with a small geometric standard deviation (GSD), indicating few ultrafine (less than 0.1 micron) particles. A few studies, however, have suggested the presence of ultrafine particles by reporting a smaller count median diameter (CMD). Part of this disparity may be due tot he inefficiency to previous sizing methods in measuring ultrafine size range, to evaluate size distribution of smoke from standard research cigarettes, commercial filter cigarettes, and from marijuana cigarettes with different delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol contents. Four 35-cm3, 2-s puffs were generated at 60-s intervals, rapidly diluted, and passed through a charge neutralizer and into a 240-L chamber. Size distribution for six cigarettes of each type was measured, CMD and GSD were determined from a computer-generated log probability plot, and MMD was calculated. The size distribution parameters obtained were similar for all cigarettes tested, with an average CMD of 0.1 micron, a MMD of 0.38 micron, and a GSD of 2.0. The MMD found using the EAA is similar to that previously reported, but the CMD is distinctly smaller and the GSD larger, indicating the presence of many more ultrafine particles. These results may explain the disparity of CMD values found in existing data. Ultrafine particles are of toxicologic importance because their respiratory tract deposition is significantly higher than for particles 0.3 to 0.5 micron and because their large surface area facilitates adsorption and delivery of potentially toxic gases to the lung.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2751166     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.1.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  8 in total

1.  Outdoor ultrafine particle concentrations in front of fast food restaurants.

Authors:  Cristina Vert; Kees Meliefste; Gerard Hoek
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Electron Microscopic Analysis of Silicate and Calcium Particles in Cigarette Smoke Tar.

Authors:  R Steven Pappas; Mary M Halstead; Clifford H Watson
Journal:  Int J Respir Pulm Med       Date:  2016-02-11

3.  Nanoparticles in cigarette smoke; real-time undiluted measurements by a scanning mobility particle sizer.

Authors:  Wouter D van Dijk; Simone Gopal; Paul T J Scheepers
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Electronic cigarette vapor alters the lateral structure but not tensiometric properties of calf lung surfactant.

Authors:  Rebecca J Przybyla; Jason Wright; Rajan Parthiban; Saeed Nazemidashtarjandi; Savas Kaya; Amir M Farnoud
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2017-11-17

5.  The Effect of Electronic Cigarette User Modifications and E-liquid Adulteration on the Particle Size Profile of an Aerosolized Product.

Authors:  Haley A Mulder; Jesse L Patterson; Matthew S Halquist; Leon Kosmider; Joseph B McGee Turner; Justin L Poklis; Alphonse Poklis; Michelle R Peace
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comprehensive characterization of mainstream marijuana and tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Brian M Graves; Tyler J Johnson; Robert T Nishida; Ryan P Dias; Benjamin Savareear; James J Harynuk; Mohsen Kazemimanesh; Jason S Olfert; Adam M Boies
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Aerosol droplet-size distribution and airborne nicotine portioning in particle and gas phases emitted by electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Hélène Lalo; Lara Leclerc; Jérémy Sorin; Jérémie Pourchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Hookah (Shisha, Narghile) Smoking and Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS). A critical review of the relevant literature and the public health consequences.

Authors:  Kamal Chaouachi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.