Yasuyuki Nasuhara1, Ken Sakushima2, Akira Endoh3, Reona Umeki3, Hiromitsu Oki4, Takehiro Yamada4, Ken Iseki4,5, Makoto Ishikawa6. 1. Division of Hospital Safety Management, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. nasuhara@med.hokudai.ac.jp. 2. Department of Regulatory Science, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. 3. Division of Medical Information Planning, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. 5. Laboratory of Clinical Pharmaceutics and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. 6. Division of Hospital Safety Management, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Following publication of our paper in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making [1], it was brought to our attention that we had used a slightly modified version of DIAS which had been originally developed by another group [2]. We inadvertently failed to include this paper in the reference list.On page two, line 21-23 in the left column, this should have been presented as “This study investigated override rates among physicians with awareness of DDIs using DIAS that requires a password override.” On page two, line 2-4, in the right column, this should have been presented as “The DIAS that requires a password override at our hospital was originally developed in collaboration between the Department of Hospital Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Asahikawa Medical University and Techno-Forum Co. Ltd., Japan”.As a result, some of figures and tables were similar in both papers, especially figure 1 (in Japanese) is very similar, therefore please disregard it. We sincerely apologize for this oversight.