Guilherme Eckhardt Molina1,2,3, Keila Elizabeth Fontana4, Luiz Guilherme Grossi Porto5,4,6, Luiz Fernando Junqueira5,7. 1. Cardiovascular Laboratory, Clinical Medicine Area, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. gmolina@unb.br. 2. Medical Sciences Postgraduate Course, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. gmolina@unb.br. 3. Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. gmolina@unb.br. 4. Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. 5. Cardiovascular Laboratory, Clinical Medicine Area, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. 6. Scholarship from the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil. 7. Medical Sciences Postgraduate Course, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Abstract
JUSTIFICATIVE: The relationship between post-exercise heart-rate recovery (HRR) and resting cardiac autonomic modulation is an incompletely explored issue. OBJECTIVE: To correlate HRR with resting supine and orthostatic autonomic status. METHOD: HRR at the 1st, 3th, and 5th min following maximal treadmill exercise were correlated with 5-min time-domain (CV, pNN50 and rMSSD) and frequency-domain (TP, LF, HF, LFn, HFn, and LF/HF ratio) indices of heart-rate variability (HRV) in both supine and standing positions in 31 healthy physically active non-athletes men. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric tests with two-tailed p value set at 5 %. RESULTS: Absolute HRR and Δ %HRR at each post-exercise time did not correlated with HRV in supine position, as well as at 1st min in standing position. At the 3rd min and 5th min, these measures negatively correlated with pNN50, rMSSD, TP, and HF indices, and only in the 5th min, they showed negative correlation with HFn and positive correlation with LF, LFn, and LF/HF ratio in the standing position. Coefficient of HRR (CHRR) at the 1st min negatively correlated with pNN50 and rMSSD and at 3rd and 5th min showed positive correlation with LFn and LF/HF ratio in supine position. With HRV indices in standing position CHRR from the 1st to 5th min showed the same respective negative and positive correlations as the other measures. CONCLUSION: HRR from the 1st to 5th min post-exercise negatively correlated with parasympathetic modulation in resting orthostatic, but showed no correlation in supine position. At the 3rd and 5th min, a positive correlation with combined sympathetic-parasympathetic modulation in both positions was observed.
JUSTIFICATIVE: The relationship between post-exercise heart-rate recovery (HRR) and resting cardiac autonomic modulation is an incompletely explored issue. OBJECTIVE: To correlate HRR with resting supine and orthostatic autonomic status. METHOD: HRR at the 1st, 3th, and 5th min following maximal treadmill exercise were correlated with 5-min time-domain (CV, pNN50 and rMSSD) and frequency-domain (TP, LF, HF, LFn, HFn, and LF/HF ratio) indices of heart-rate variability (HRV) in both supine and standing positions in 31 healthy physically active non-athletes men. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric tests with two-tailed p value set at 5 %. RESULTS: Absolute HRR and Δ %HRR at each post-exercise time did not correlated with HRV in supine position, as well as at 1st min in standing position. At the 3rd min and 5th min, these measures negatively correlated with pNN50, rMSSD, TP, and HF indices, and only in the 5th min, they showed negative correlation with HFn and positive correlation with LF, LFn, and LF/HF ratio in the standing position. Coefficient of HRR (CHRR) at the 1st min negatively correlated with pNN50 and rMSSD and at 3rd and 5th min showed positive correlation with LFn and LF/HF ratio in supine position. With HRV indices in standing position CHRR from the 1st to 5th min showed the same respective negative and positive correlations as the other measures. CONCLUSION: HRR from the 1st to 5th min post-exercise negatively correlated with parasympathetic modulation in resting orthostatic, but showed no correlation in supine position. At the 3rd and 5th min, a positive correlation with combined sympathetic-parasympathetic modulation in both positions was observed.
Authors: Jeffrey J Goldberger; Francis Kiet Le; Marc Lahiri; Prince J Kannankeril; Jason Ng; Alan H Kadish Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2006-01-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Michael R Esco; Michele S Olson; Henry N Williford; Daniel L Blessing; David Shannon; Peter Grandjean Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2009-10-10 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Xavier Jouven; Jean-Philippe Empana; Peter J Schwartz; Michel Desnos; Dominique Courbon; Pierre Ducimetière Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; Duanping Liao; Gregory W Evans; Wayne E Cascio; Lloyd E Chambless; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ivana Antelmi; Eliseu Yung Chuang; Cesar José Grupi; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Alfredo José Mansur Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Bruno T Campos; Eduardo M Penna; João G S Rodrigues; Mateus Diniz; Thiago T Mendes; André F C Filho; Emerson Franchini; Fabio Y Nakamura; Luciano S Prado Journal: J Hum Kinet Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Renan R Dos Santos; Erica C Rosa; Thiago Rosa; Eduardo A Ferreira; Eliana F Gris; Rosângela V de Andrade; Angélica A Amato Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Amir Sarshin; Alireza Naderi; Carlos Janssen Gomes da Cruz; Foad Feizolahi; Scott C Forbes; Darren G Candow; Ebrahim Mohammadgholian; Mehrdad Amiri; Naghmeh Jafari; Alireza Rahimi; Eidi Alijani; Conrad P Earnest Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 5.150