Literature DB >> 27510399

The Author's Response: Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Woo Hyun Paik1, Yong Tae Kim2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27510399      PMCID: PMC4974197          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


× No keyword cloud information.
Response: Dr. Karabicak raised issue that the enrolled patients in our study may not be the truly locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) (1), and staging laparoscopy is strictly recommended to define LAPC and to exclude minute metastasis. Preoperative diagnostic accuracy to define resectability of pancreatic cancer is important, however, preoperative determination of resectability of pancreatic cancer is still challenging. We totally agree with Dr. Karabicak's opinion that current axial imaging is limited to diagnose minute metastatic lesions (2). It is not sufficient to assess the true response of neoadjuvant therapy, either (3). However, we do not agree with the opinion that staging laparoscopy is strictly recommended to define minute metastasis in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. More than three-quarters of patients experience tumor recurrence even after radical resection of pancreatic cancer (4), and adjuvant chemotherapy has shown survival benefit in pancreatic cancer (5). Based on these findings, we expect that there would be a high probability of micrometastasis even in resectable pancreatic cancer (6). Therefore, we think that staging laparoscopy to identify small metastatic lesions is not essential in pancreatic cancer. NCCN guideline also recommends laparoscopy as optional not mandatory describing that diagnostic staging laparoscopy to rule out metastasis not visible at standard imaging is routinely used in some institutions prior to surgery or chemoradiation. Also, locoregional therapy has limited value in pancreatic cancer, and we conducted systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU, gemcitabine, or capecitabine along with 50.4 Gy of radiotherapy assuming that there would be a high probability of micrometastasis in LAPC. The benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer are as follows; 1) avoid unnecessary operation in the patient with a very aggressive tumor that would not benefit from a resection despite the absence of systemic spread at the time of diagnosis, 2) improvement of R0 resection rates and prevention of local recurrence (47). With the introduction of highly effective chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX, the neoadjuvant therapy protocol would be changed (3489). In conclusion, we agree with Dr. Karabicak's opinion that there would be a chance of including patients with minute metastasis that means stage IV initially in our study. However, we do not think that staging laparoscopy is essential to identify metastatic lesions in LAPC. In addition, the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis has not been proved and still under investigation (10). The intraperitoneal chemotherapy would require more clinical evidence.
  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of resectability and survival after concurrent chemoradiation in primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alessio G Morganti; Mariangela Massaccesi; Giuseppe La Torre; Luciana Caravatta; Adele Piscopo; Rosa Tambaro; Luigi Sofo; Giuseppina Sallustio; Marcello Ingrosso; Gabriella Macchia; Francesco Deodato; Vincenzo Picardi; Edy Ippolito; Numa Cellini; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreas cancer: a new treatment paradigm?

Authors:  Kathleen K Christians; Susan Tsai; Anna Mahmoud; Paul Ritch; James P Thomas; Lauren Wiebe; Tracy Kelly; Beth Erickson; Huamin Wang; Douglas B Evans; Ben George
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02-25

3.  The analysis of resectability and survival in pancreatic cancer patients with vascular invasion.

Authors:  D I Park; J K Lee; J E Kim; J G Hyun; S G Shim; K T Lee; S W Palk; J C Rhee; K W Choi; J H Lim; Y I Kim
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer improves resectability.

Authors:  Ronica H Nanda; Bassel El-Rayes; Shishir K Maithel; Jerome Landry
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) and borderline resectable (BRPC) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Marlo Blazer; Christina Wu; Richard M Goldberg; Gary Phillips; Carl Schmidt; Peter Muscarella; Evan Wuthrick; Terrence M Williams; Joshua Reardon; E Christopher Ellison; Mark Bloomston; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Multicenter Phase II Study of Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel With S-1 for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Masanao Kurata; Naminatsu Takahara; Suguru Yamada; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Masamichi Mizuma; Goro Honda; Hiroyuki Isayama; Michiaki Unno; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hironori Ishigami; Masanori Kon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew P Loehrer; Cristina R Ferrone
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Woo Hyun Paik; Sang Hyub Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Jin Myung Park; Byeong Jun Song; Ji Kon Ryu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.