Literature DB >> 27510398

Letter to the Editor: Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Ilhan Karabicak1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27510398      PMCID: PMC4974196          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: I have read with interest the study "Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer" by Paik et al. (1). The article shares the experince of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) which authors conclude as preoperative CCRT in LAPC rarely leads to surgical downstaging, and it could lower resectability rates. In the manuscript, the authors state that "During follow-up, 46 patients (85%) died and the median overall survival was 16.2 (95% CI 12.7-19.7) months. Disease progression was observed in 47 patients (87%) and the median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.0-8.8) (Fig. 2B). Among the patients with disease progression, systemic presentations (36 patients, 77%) were more frequent than local progression (11 patients, 23%)." I have several comments to make on this article. First, I saw in the manuscript that none of the patients had pre-treatment staging either by open or laparoscopic surgery, although 94% of the patients were in Stage 3. Although CT/MR can diagnose apparent metastasis, current axial imaging is limited when it comes to completely visualized potentially small peritoneal and distant tumor deposits (23). Studies have shown that a certain number of Stage 3 patients are diagnosed with minute peritoneal or distant metastasis when a staging laparoscopy is performed (345). In addition, locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients have a high incidence of positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology, which unfortunately has a similar survival rate to that of patients with metastasis if treated locoregionally (67). In particular, some of these patients are actually in Stage 4, but we treat them as Stage in whom chemoradiation therapy would not add any survival benefit. Second, this study included more systemic presentations (36 patients, 77%) than local progression (11 patients, 23%) among the patients with disease progression. Fig. 2B shows that nearly 60% of the patients had systemic presentations within 6 months, which is really a short period of time to have that number of systemic presentations in Stage 3 though treatment (1). The author's findings also support the possibility that the patients could have minute peritoneal or distant metastasis or that they could have positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology if performed before concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Third, any patients diagnosed with peritoneal metastasis or positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology can be candidates for intraperitoneal therapy (7). In conclusion, staging laparoscopy is strictly recommended in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients before accepting these patients as Stage 3 and initiating any locoregional therapy. This will allow accurate therapy and staging.
  7 in total

1.  Selective use of staging laparoscopy based on carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level and tumor size in patients with radiographically defined potentially or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Hideyoshi Toyokawa; Kentaro Inoue; Keita Wada; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Satoshi Hirooka; So Yamaki; Rintaro Yui; Hynek Mergental; A-Hon Kwon
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 2.  Technologies for imaging the normal and diseased pancreas.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Jeffrey Smith; Stuart Sherman; Kimberly Kelly
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Staging laparoscopy leads to rapid induction of chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Kazuya Sakata; Shigeki Nakagawa; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Masahiko Hirota; Naoya Yoshida; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2015-02

4.  Multicenter Phase II Study of Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel With S-1 for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Masanao Kurata; Naminatsu Takahara; Suguru Yamada; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Masamichi Mizuma; Goro Honda; Hiroyuki Isayama; Michiaki Unno; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hironori Ishigami; Masanori Kon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Staging laparoscopy enhances the detection of occult metastases in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Carlo M Contreras; Eric J Stanelle; John Mansour; J Louis Hinshaw; Layton F Rikkers; Robert Rettammel; David M Mahvi; Clifford S Cho; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Woo Hyun Paik; Sang Hyub Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Jin Myung Park; Byeong Jun Song; Ji Kon Ryu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Positive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage Cytology is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Kenichi Hirabayashi; Akiko Imoto; Misuzu Yamada; Atsuko Hadano; Nobuaki Kato; Youko Miyajima; Hitoshi Ito; Yoshiaki Kawaguchi; Toshio Nakagohri; Tetsuya Mine; Naoya Nakamura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.