Literature DB >> 2751017

The reliability of self-reported cigarette consumption in the United States.

E J Hatziandreu1, J P Pierce, M C Fiore, V Grise, T E Novotny, R M Davis.   

Abstract

To investigate the possibility that self-reported smoking is not a valid measure for assessing trends in smoking prevalence, we compared total self-reported cigarette consumption with the adjusted consumption data from cigarette excise taxes as reported by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the period 1974 through 1985. Self-reported consumption was calculated by using data from the National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) for adults and from the National Household Surveys on Drug Abuse for adolescents. For this period, the average ratio of self-reported cigarette consumption to the USDA estimate of consumption was 0.72 (range = 0.69 to 0.78). There was no statistical difference in this consumption ratio from year to year, indicating no apparent increase in the underreporting of cigarette smoking in these surveys. We conclude that cross-sectional surveys of self-reported smoking status remain a reliable surveillance tool for monitoring changes in population smoking behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2751017      PMCID: PMC1349899          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.8.1020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Educational differences are increasing.

Authors:  J P Pierce; M C Fiore; T E Novotny; E J Hatziandreu; R M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. The changing influence of gender and race.

Authors:  M C Fiore; T E Novotny; J P Pierce; E J Hatziandreu; K M Patel; R M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Projections to the year 2000.

Authors:  J P Pierce; M C Fiore; T E Novotny; E J Hatziandreu; R M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Pack size, reported cigarette smoking rates, and public health.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Uptake and quitting smoking trends in Australia 1974-1984.

Authors:  J P Pierce; R N Aldrich; S Hanratty; T Dwyer; D Hill
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Indirect measures of cigarette use: expired-air carbon monoxide versus plasma thiocyanate.

Authors:  S P Fortmann; T Rogers; K Vranizan; W L Haskell; D S Solomon; J W Farquhar
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.018

  6 in total
  46 in total

1.  State and federal revenues from tobacco consumed by minors.

Authors:  J R DiFranza; J J Librett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effect of the tobacco price support program on cigarette consumption in the United States: an updated model.

Authors:  P Zhang; C Husten; G Giovino
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Youth smoking prevention and tobacco industry revenue.

Authors:  C Healton; M C Farrelly; D Weitzenkamp; D Lindsey; M L Haviland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Which sociodemographic factors are important on smoking behaviour of high school students? The contribution of classification and regression tree methodology in a broad epidemiological survey.

Authors:  C Ozge; F Toros; E Bayramkaya; H Camdeviren; T Sasmaz
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  A wearable sensor system for monitoring cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Edward Sazonov; Paulo Lopez-Meyer; Stephen Tiffany
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Uptake, Outcomes, and Costs in the United States: Challenges With Existing Data and Recommendations for Improvement.

Authors:  Ashish Rai; V Paul Doria-Rose; Gerard A Silvestri; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Familial confounding of the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring criminality: a population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Brian M D'Onofrio; Amber L Singh; Anastasia Iliadou; Mats Lambe; Christina M Hultman; Martin Grann; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Niklas Långström; Paul Lichtenstein
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05

8.  To what extent do parents strive to protect their children from environmental tobacco smoke in the Nordic countries? A population-based study.

Authors:  K E Lund; A Skrondal; H Vertio; A R Helgason
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Chapter 7: Description of MISCAN-lung, the Erasmus MC Lung Cancer microsimulation model for evaluating cancer control interventions.

Authors:  F W Schultz; R Boer; H J de Koning
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Using the National Health Interview Survey to understand and address the impact of tobacco in the United States: past perspectives and future considerations.

Authors:  Cathy L Backinger; Deirdre Lawrence; Judith Swan; Deborah M Winn; Nancy Breen; Anne Hartman; Rachel Grana; David Tran; Samantha Farrell
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2008-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.