Literature DB >> 27509763

Rapidly restoring biological soil crusts and ecosystem functions in a severely disturbed desert ecosystem.

Lindsay P Chiquoine, Scott R Abella, Matthew A Bowker.   

Abstract

Restoring biological soil crusts (biocrusts) in degraded drylands can contribute to recovery of ecosystem functions that have global implications, including erosion resistance and nutrient cycling. To examine techniques for restoring biocrusts, we conducted a replicated, factorial experiment on recently abandoned road surfaces by applying biocrust inoculation (salvaged and stored dry for two years), salvaged topsoil, an abiotic soil amendment (wood shavings), and planting of a dominant perennial shrub (Ambrosia dumosa). Eighteen months after treatments, we measured biocrust abundance and species composition, soil chlorophyll a content and fertility, and soil resistance to erosion. Biocrust addition significantly accelerated biocrust recovery on disturbed soils, including increasing lichen and moss cover and cyanobacteria colonization. Compared to undisturbed controls, inoculated plots had similar lichen and moss composition, recovered 43% of total cyanobacteria density, had similar soil chlorophyll content, and exhibited recovery of soil fertility and soil stability. Inoculation was the only treatment that generated lichen and moss cover. Topsoil application resulted in partial recovery of the cyanobacteria community and soil properties. Compared to untreated disturbed plots, topsoil application without inoculum increased cyanobacteria density by 186% and moderately improved soil chlorophyll and ammonium content and soil stability. Topsoil application produced 22% and 51% of the cyanobacteria density g⁻¹ soil compared to undisturbed and inoculated plots, respectively. Plots not treated with either topsoil or inoculum had significantly lower cyanobacteria density, soil chlorophyll and ammonium concentrations, and significantly higher soil nitrate concentration. Wood shavings and Ambrosia had no influence on biocrust lichen and moss species recovery but did affect cyanobacteria composition and soil fertility. Inoculation of severely disturbed soil with native biocrusts rapidly restored biocrust communities and soil stability such that restored areas were similar to undisturbed desert within three years. Using salvaged biocrust as inoculum can be an effective tool in ecological restoration because of its efficacy and simple implementation. Although salvaging biocrust material can be technically difficult and potentially costly, utilizing opportunities to salvage material in planned future disturbance can provide additional land management tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27509763     DOI: 10.1002/15-0973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  10 in total

Review 1.  Xerotolerant bacteria: surviving through a dry spell.

Authors:  Pedro H Lebre; Pieter De Maayer; Don A Cowan
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome.

Authors:  Noah Fierer
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Insights into dryland biocrust microbiome: geography, soil depth and crust type affect biocrust microbial communities and networks in Mojave Desert, USA.

Authors:  Nuttapon Pombubpa; Nicole Pietrasiak; Paul De Ley; Jason E Stajich
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Incorporating Biogeochemistry into Dryland Restoration.

Authors:  Kristina E Young; Sasha C Reed; Scott Ferrenberg; Akasha Faist; Daniel E Winkler; Catherine Cort; Anthony Darrouzet-Nardi
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 11.566

5.  Water Availability, Soil Characteristics, and Confounding Effects on the Patterns of Biocrust Diversity in the Desert Regions of Northern China.

Authors:  Jingyao Sun; Xinrong Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Successful lichen translocation on disturbed gypsum areas: A test with adhesives to promote the recovery of biological soil crusts.

Authors:  M Ballesteros; J Ayerbe; M Casares; E M Cañadas; J Lorite
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exogenous Microorganisms Promote Moss Biocrust Growth by Regulating the Microbial Metabolic Pathway in Artificial Laboratory Cultivation.

Authors:  Chang Tian; Heming Wang; Shufang Wu; Chongfeng Bu; Xueqiang Bai; Yahong Li; Kadambot H M Siddique
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled.

Authors:  Anita Antoninka; Peter F Chuckran; Rebecca L Mau; Mandy L Slate; Brent D Mishler; Melvin J Oliver; Kirsten K Coe; Llo R Stark; Kirsten M Fisher; Matthew A Bowker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Rewilding with invertebrates and microbes to restore ecosystems: Present trends and future directions.

Authors:  Peter Contos; Jennifer L Wood; Nicholas P Murphy; Heloise Gibb
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  The Ecology of Subaerial Biofilms in Dry and Inhospitable Terrestrial Environments.

Authors:  Federica Villa; Francesca Cappitelli
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.