Literature DB >> 27509753

Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture.

Angela K Fuller, Chris S Sutherland, J Andrew Royle, Matthew P Hare.   

Abstract

Estimating the abundance or density of populations is fundamental to the conservation and management of species, and as landscapes become more fragmented, maintaining landscape connectivity has become one of the most important challenges for biodiversity conservation. Yet these two issues have never been formally integrated together in a model that simultaneously models abundance while accounting for connectivity of a landscape. We demonstrate an application of using capture-recapture to develop a model of animal density using a least-cost path model for individual encounter probability that accounts for non-Euclidean connectivity in a highly structured network. We utilized scat detection dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) as a means of collecting non-invasive genetic samples of American mink (Neovison vison) individuals and used spatial capture-recapture models (SCR) to gain inferences about mink population density and connectivity. Density of mink was not constant across the landscape, but rather increased with increasing distance from city, town, or village centers, and mink activity was associated with water. The SCR model allowed us to estimate the density and spatial distribution of individuals across a 388 km² area. The model was used to investigate patterns of space usage and to evaluate covariate effects on encounter probabilities, including differences between sexes. This study provides an application of capture-recapture models based on ecological distance, allowing us to directly estimate landscape connectivity. This approach should be widely applicable to provide simultaneous direct estimates of density, space usage, and landscape connectivity for many species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27509753     DOI: 10.1890/15-0315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  9 in total

1.  Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.

Authors:  Robby R Marrotte; Eric J Howe; Kaela B Beauclerc; Derek Potter; Joseph M Northrup
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.

Authors:  Greta M Schmidt; Tabitha A Graves; Jordan C Pederson; Sarah L Carroll
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.105

3.  A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.

Authors:  Robert M Dorazio; K Ullas Karanth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.

Authors:  J Terrill Paterson; Kelly Proffitt; Ben Jimenez; Jay Rotella; Robert Garrott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population.

Authors:  Katherine C Kendall; Tabitha A Graves; J Andrew Royle; Amy C Macleod; Kevin S McKelvey; John Boulanger; John S Waller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Potential niche expansion of the American mink invading a remote island free of native-predatory mammals.

Authors:  Ramiro D Crego; Jaime E Jiménez; Ricardo Rozzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Large-scale variation in density of an aquatic ecosystem indicator species.

Authors:  Chris Sutherland; Angela K Fuller; J Andrew Royle; Matthew P Hare; Sean Madden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency.

Authors:  Simone Tenan; Paolo Pedrini; Natalia Bragalanti; Claudio Groff; Chris Sutherland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spatial capture-recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density.

Authors:  Benedikt R Schmidt; Anita Meier; Chris Sutherland; J Andy Royle
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.