| Literature DB >> 27509087 |
Maíra Trevisan1, Sergio A De Bortoli1, Alessandra M Vacari1, Valéria L Laurentis1, Dagmara G Ramalho2.
Abstract
Although the parasitoid Cotesia flavipes (Cameron) has proven effective in controlling sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius) for many years, concern has arisen over the quality of individuals produced at large scales. The parasitoid has been reared in laboratories in Brazil for more than 40 years, with no new introductions of new populations during that period. Since the quality of the parasitoids was not verified at the time of the species' introduction in Brazil, we do not know if there has been any reduction in quality so far. However, it is possible to determine whether the parasitoid could reduce in quality in future generations. Thus, the objective of this research was to assess the quality of these insects over 10 generations and look for evidence of any loss in quality. We used two populations: one from a biofactory that has been maintained in the laboratory for over 40 years, and an inbred laboratory population. Both were bred, and compared for 10 generations. We wanted to determine what happened to the quality of the parasitoid after 10 generations in an extreme inbreeding situation. To assure inbreeding, newly emerged females were forced to mate with a sibling. Individual females were then allowed to parasitize larvae of D. saccharalis. We performed evaluations for each generation until the tenth generation, and recorded the sex ratio, percentage emergence, number of offspring/females, and longevity of both males and females. Results of the measurements of biological characteristics demonstrated random significant differences between populations; best results were obtained intermittently for both the biofactory population and the inbred population. No significant differences across generations for the same population were observed. Thus, rearing of a C. flavipes population subjected to inbreeding for 10 generations was not sufficient to reveal any deleterious effects of inbreeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27509087 PMCID: PMC4979891 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Pupal period of individuals from two populations of Cotesia flavipes.
| Population | ||
|---|---|---|
| Inbred | Biofactory | |
| P | 6.0 ± 0.00 f | - |
| F1 | 3.9 ± 0.03 h | 5.0 ± 0.00 c |
| F2 | 5.4 ± 0.15 g | 6.0 ± 0.00 b |
| F3 | 6.0 ± 0.00 f | 3.8 ± 0.05 f |
| F4 | 7.8 ± 0.09 a | 5.9 ± 0.13 b |
| F5 | 6.4 ± 0.08 cd | 4.6 ± 0.07 d |
| F6 | 6.1 ± 0.06 ef | 5.1 ± 0.10 c |
| F7 | 6.1 ± 0.07 def | 5.9 ± 0.08 b |
| F8 | 7.4 ± 0.09 b | 7.0 ± 0.00 a |
| F9 | 6.6 ± 0.07 c | 5.1 ± 0.11 c |
| F10 | 6.4 ± 0.08 cde | 4.2 ± 0.11 e |
1Means ± standard error
*denotes difference in the rows, and lowercase letters indicate differences in the column (P < 0.05).
Percentage of adults emerged per mass from two populations of Cotesia flavipes.
| Population | ||
|---|---|---|
| Inbred | Biofactory | |
| P | 70.9 ± 0.00 abc | - |
| F1 | 71.6 ± 2.89 ab | 59.5 ± 2.96 c |
| F2 | 81.9 ± 1.99 a | 72.6 ± 2.65 ab |
| F3 | 74.8 ± 2.74 ab | 73.8 ± 2.58 ab |
| F4 | 38.1 ± 3.69 d | 66.9 ± 4.55 abc |
| F5 | 69.6 ± 3.07 abc | 71.7 ± 3.00 abc |
| F6 | 62.9 ± 3.18 bc | 66.3 ± 2.99 bc |
| F7 | 67.2 ± 2.83 bc | 72.2 ± 3.02 abc |
| F8 | 57.6 ± 3.32 c | 75.5 ± 1.80 ab |
| F9 | 75.9 ± 2.71 ab | 80.8 ± 2.02 a |
| F10 | 62.9 ± 2.89 bc | 43.9 ± 3.22 d |
1Means ± standard error
*denotes difference in the rows and lowercase letters indicate differences in the column (P < 0.05).
Total of adults emerged per mass from two populations of Cotesia flavipes.
| Population | ||
|---|---|---|
| Inbred | Biofactory | |
| P | 57.0 ± 3.35 a | - |
| F1 | 50.5 ± 3.19 ab | 32.3 ± 2.31 b |
| F2 | 57.9 ± 3.24 a | 56.8 ± 3.97 a |
| F3 | 55.5 ± 3.53 a | 49.9 ± 3.73 a |
| F4 | 24.4 ± 2.73 c | 30.2 ± 4.16 b |
| F5 | 55.5 ± 3.86 a | 57.2 ± 3.76 a |
| F6 | 43.9 ± 3.85 ab | 42.5 ± 3.87 ab |
| F7 | 55.9 ± 3.64 a | 54.6 ± 4.25 a |
| F8 | 37.1 ± 2.65 bc | 58.3 ± 3.17 a |
| F9 | 44.7 ± 3.12 ab | 54.9 ± 2.32 a |
| F10 | 42.7 ± 3.42 ab | 31.5 ± 2.97 b |
1Means ± standard error
*denotes difference in the rows and lowercase letters indicate differences in the column (P < 0.05).
Sex ratio of individuals from two populations of Cotesia flavipes.
| Population | ||
|---|---|---|
| Inbred | Biofactory | |
| P | 0.8 ± 0.00 a | - |
| F1 | 0.7 ± 0.02 abcd | 0.5 ± 0.05 cd |
| F2 | 0.8 ± 0.01ab | 0.7 ± 0.03 ab |
| F3 | 0.7 ± 0.02 abcd | 0.7 ± 0.04 abc |
| F4 | 0.7 ± 0.03 bcd | 0.8 ± 0.05 a |
| F5 | 0.7 ± 0.03 bcd | 0.6 ± 0.04 bcd |
| F6 | 0.6 ± 0.04 d | 0.5 ± 0.04 d |
| F7 | 0.7 ± 0.02 bcd | 0.5 ± 0.05 d |
| F8 | 0.6 ± 0.04 cd | 0.5 ± 0.03 cd |
| F9 | 0.7 ± 0.03 bcd | 0.6 ± 0.03 abcd |
| F10 | 0.7 ± 0.02 abc | 0.7 ± 0.04 abc |
1Means ± standard error
*denotes difference in the rows and lowercase letters indicate differences in the column (P < 0.05).
Fig 1Male survival of Cotesia flavipes from a population subjected to inbreeding and a control population.
Fig 2Female survival of Cotesia flavipes from a population subjected to inbreeding and a control population.