| Literature DB >> 27508251 |
Vahid Noroozi Karbasdehi1, Sina Dobaradaran2, Iraj Nabipour3, Hossein Arfaeinia4, Roghayeh Mirahmadi1, Mozhgan Keshtkar1.
Abstract
In this data article, by using inductively coupled plasma optical spectrometry (ICP-OES), we aimed to (1) determine the concentration levels of As, Ag, Sr, Sn, Sb, and Mo in the sediments and the shells of Trachycardium lacunosum simultaneously in two separated areas (unpolluted and polluted areas) (2) comparison between the metal contents of sediments in the unpolluted and polluted areas as well as shells. Analysis of data showed that sediment as well as shell samples in polluted area contained significantly higher concentration levels of all measured metals compared with unpolluted area.Entities:
Keywords: Heavy metal; Persian Gulf; Sediment; Trachycardium lacunosum
Year: 2016 PMID: 27508251 PMCID: PMC4961305 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.06.065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Concentration levels of metals (µg g−1 dw) in sediment samples in polluted and unpolluted areas.
| 0.13 | 0.6 | 95 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.5 | ||
| 0.16 | 0.7 | 121 | 2.1 | 2 | 0.35 | ||
| 0.20 | 0.6 | 99 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.20 | 0.6 | 145 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 0.36 | ||
| 0.25 | 0.7 | 152 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 0.41 | ||
| 0.33 | 0.8 | 136 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 0.61 | ||
| 0.52 | 0.8 | 137 | 3.2 | 6.4 | 0.74 | ||
| 0.70 | 0.9 | 128 | 2.1 | 7.8 | 0.71 | ||
| 0.81 | 0.4 | 85 | 3.4 | 9.4 | 0.39 | ||
| 0.79 | 0.6 | 154 | 3.3 | 8.1 | 0.42 | ||
| 0.46 | 0.4 | 126 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 0.54 | ||
| 0.10 | 0.5 | 126 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.57 | ||
| 0.14 | 0.6 | 146 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 0.85 | ||
| 0.07 | 0.7 | 137 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.17 | 0.8 | 152 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 0.36 | ||
| 0.14 | 0.9 | 163 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.35 | ||
| 0.21 | 0.5 | 172 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.14 | 0.6 | 132 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.13 | 0.7 | 146 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 0.41 | ||
| 12.5 | 1.1 | 325 | 4.23 | 5.9 | 1.5 | ||
| 12.3 | 1.1 | 452 | 4.5 | 19.3 | 1.65 | ||
| 13.5 | 1.2 | 489 | 4.78 | 19.4 | 1.75 | ||
| 14.2 | 1.2 | 1234 | 5.36 | 16 | 1.71 | ||
| 11.2 | 1.3 | 249 | 8.23 | 17.4 | 3.25 | ||
| 11.3 | 1.1 | 895 | 6.32 | 14.8 | 2.75 | ||
| 12.6 | 1.4 | 1124 | 7.32 | 16.9 | 4.53 | ||
| 14.3 | 1.5 | 1243 | 5.6 | 15.3 | 5.21 | ||
| 15.3 | 1.4 | 865 | 4.23 | 15.3 | 3.22 | ||
| 11.2 | 1.6 | 875 | 4.56 | 16.4 | 6.52 | ||
| 13.8 | 1.7 | 652 | 4.12 | 17 | 7.21 | ||
| 11.6 | 1.3 | 452 | 4.25 | 18.4 | 6.32 | ||
| 12.6 | 1.3 | 365 | 4.34 | 20.7 | 8.21 | ||
| 12.5 | 1.2 | 263 | 5.32 | 16.4 | 5.32 | ||
| 14.6 | 1.5 | 965 | 8.32 | 16.2 | 4.38 | ||
| 16.2 | 1.6 | 1354 | 7.54 | 13.6 | 1.29 | ||
| 11.7 | 1.5 | 562 | 4.23 | 17.8 | 7.98 | ||
| 15.3 | 1.3 | 786 | 4.12 | 14.8 | 8.31 | ||
| 16.3 | 1.1 | 896 | 4.21 | 15.3 | 9.52 | ||
| 14.9 | 1.1 | 254 | 4.33 | 16.2 | 3.22 | ||
Fig. 1Comparison of metals concentration levels in the sediment samples in polluted and unpolluted areas.
Concentration levels of metals (µg g−1 dw) in shell samples in polluted and unpolluted areas.
| 0.02 | 0.002 | 35 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.01 | ||
| 0.03 | 0.001 | 22 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.03 | ||
| 0.01 | 0.001 | 21 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.02 | ||
| 0.04 | 0.003 | 25 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 0.03 | ||
| 0.06 | 0.001 | 31 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 0.04 | ||
| 0.02 | 0.006 | 22 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.05 | ||
| 0.03 | 0.006 | 23 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 0.05 | ||
| 0.06 | 0.007 | 26 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.03 | ||
| 0.04 | 0.008 | 35 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.02 | ||
| 0.02 | 0.006 | 45 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.04 | ||
| 0.03 | 0.001 | 22 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.03 | ||
| 0.04 | 0.002 | 26 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.04 | ||
| 0.05 | 0.003 | 28 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.03 | ||
| 2.5 | 0.12 | 150 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 0.7 | ||
| 3.3 | 0.23 | 185 | 3.1 | 7.4 | 1.7 | ||
| 3.2 | 0.21 | 97 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 1.8 | ||
| 4.2 | 0.33 | 144 | 3.2 | 12.4 | 3.3 | ||
| 1.3 | 0.22 | 125 | 2.3 | 11.8 | 2.6 | ||
| 2.9 | 0.21 | 125 | 3.3 | 10.9 | 4.4 | ||
| 4.7 | 0.11 | 85 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 5.6 | ||
| 5.3 | 0.12 | 162 | 2.2 | 6.3 | 3.4 | ||
| 1.6 | 0.13 | 168 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 6.3 | ||
| 2.6 | 0.15 | 139 | 2.2 | 9.4 | 6.9 | ||
| 6.6 | 0.25 | 145 | 2.3 | 6.7 | 8.3 | ||
| 4.5 | 0.26 | 99 | 2.3 | 6.4 | 5.7 | ||
| 6.6 | 0.11 | 78 | 2.3 | 6.2 | 4.6 | ||
| 6.2 | 0.12 | 135 | 3.2 | 5.6 | 1.3 | ||
| 5.7 | 0.12 | 85 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 7.2 | ||
| 5.3 | 0.13 | 185 | 2.1 | 13.8 | 8.3 | ||
| 4.3 | 0.14 | 136 | 2.2 | 11.3 | 9.4 | ||
| 3.9 | 0.15 | 128 | 2.3 | 12.2 | 3.6 | ||
Fig. 2Comparison of metals concentration levels in the shell samples in polluted and unpolluted areas.
Fig. 3The map and locations of sampling station.
ICP-OES instrumental operating details.
| Company, model | SPECTRO (Germany), Spectro arcos |
| RF generator power (W) | 1400 |
| Frequency of RF generator (MHz) | 27.12 MHz |
| Type of detector | Charge coupled devices (CCD) |
| Torch type | Flared-end EOP torch 2.5 mm |
| Plasma, auxiliary, and nebulizer gas | High purity (99.99%) argon |
| Plasma gas flow rate (L min−1) | 14.5 |
| Auxiliary gas flow rate (L min−1) | 0.9 |
| Nebulizer gas flow rate (L min−1) | 0.85 |
| Sample uptake time (s) | 240 total |
| Delay time of (s) | – |
| Rinse time of (s) | 45 |
| Initial stabilization time (s) | Preflush: 45 |
| Time between replicate analysis (s) | – |
| Measurement replicate | 3 |
| Pump rate | 30 RPM |
| Element ( | Ag 328.068; As 189.042; Sr 346.446 |
| Sn 189.991; Sb 206.833; Mo 204.598 | |