Potential immunotherapeutic role of interleukin-2 and interleukin-12 combination in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Many recent therapeutic interventions are necessary to improve the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including immunotherapy, which seems to offer one of the new realistic therapeutic modalities. This study aims to investigate the optimization of immunotherapy for HCC patients by appraisal of both interferon (IFN)-γ levels and phenotyping of lymphocytes obtained from peripheral blood and fine-needle aspirates.
METHODS: The isolated lymphocytes were cultured in the presence of interleukins (IL)-2, IL-4, and IL-12. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometric techniques were used for the assessment of human IFN-γ production and the studied T-cell subpopulations, respectively.
RESULTS: Mixed cell populations of peripheral blood lymphocytes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes treated with IL-2 plus IL-12 showed a marked and significant elevation in IFN-γ levels in their culture media, a significant decrease in the percentage of cluster of differentiation (CD)4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells, and a nonsignificant increase in the percentage of CD8(+) cytotoxic T-cells. Meanwhile, IL-2 plus IL-4 treatment demonstrated nonsignificant effects.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that IL-12 together with IL-2 caused a suppression of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells and an elevation of IFN-γ levels, which play a crucial immunotherapeutic role in the management of HCC patients.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor and it represents the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world.1

Lymphocytes contribute to the tumor microenvironment through immunity and inflammation. In HCC, extremely marked infiltration of T-cells, including predominant cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ T-cells has been shown to be closely associated with a low recurrence rate and good prognosis. CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) can directly kill target cells by releasing granules, including membrane-lytic materials such as perforin and granzymes, thereby playing a central role in antitumor immunity.2

T-regulatory cells, another subset of T-cells, are a minor but functionally unique population of T-cells that maintain immune homeostasis in immune tolerance, and they also play a role in controlling autoimmunity. They are thought to have a positive effect on tumor growth through the suppression of antitumor immune cells.3

Interleukin (IL)-2 is a pleiotropic cytokine that drives T-cell growth, induces the differentiation of regulatory T-cells (T-regs), and mediates activation-induced cell death.4 It is an important cytokine in the generation of antitumor immunity mediated by CTLs.5

IL-4 is a multifunctional pleiotropic cytokine produced mainly by activated T cells but also by mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils.6 It is known for defining the so-called Th2 phenotype of lymphocytes and for regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis.6

IL-12, known as T-cell differentiation factor, is an important immune regulatory cytokine produced mainly by antigen-presenting cells.7 Its main physiological functions include that it can induce hematopoietic cell proliferation, enhance cytotoxicity, facilitate the expression of cytotoxic mediators, produce type-1 cytokines (particularly interferon [IFN]-γ), and favor cell differentiation.7

IFN-γ is a pleiotropic cytokine with immunomodulatory, antiviral, and antiproliferative effects.8 This cytokine is produced predominantly by natural killer and natural killer T-cells as part of the innate immune response, and by Th1 CD4 and CD8 CTL effector T-cells once antigen-specific immunity develops.9 IFN-γ produced by tumor infiltrating T-cells might play two distinct roles in antitumor activity: the activation of antitumor T-cells; and direct tumoricidal activity.10

Subjects and methods

Sample selection

Thirty-eight patients with HCC in the age range of 39–72 years were enrolled in this study. They were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Clinical Pathology Department of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University (Cairo, Egypt). After obtaining the appropriate written informed consent from patients following the institutional review board’s approved protocols, blood and liver aspirate specimens were collected from patients with HCC. Sterilized samples of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and heparinized peripheral blood (HPB) were obtained by NCI radiologists. HPB samples drawn from ten apparently healthy persons were considered as normal healthy controls. All samples were subjected to the following criteria: routine clinical examination; pathological examination; cell count with viability; and biochemical parameters represented by IFN-γ measurements and phenotypic analyses of the cultured cells being studied.

Cell density and viability studies

Mononuclear leukocytes were extracted from liver FNA and peripheral blood samples, as previously described;11,12 they were isolated using Ficoll–Hypaque separation media.13 The lymphocytes were purified from the monocytes by allowing the latter to adhere to plastic flasks for 1 hour, after which the nonadherent lymphocytes were pipetted from the flasks.14 A total of 20 μL of lymphocytes were presented for the count and viability studies using a hemocytometer, phosphate–buffered saline, and 0.4% trypan blue.

Cell culture and interleukin treatment

Lymphocytes were cultivated in cell culture medium (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA [RPMI]-1640) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin, and one or a combination of the following three cytokines: recombinant human IL-2 (IL-2; 4 ng/mL); recombinant human IL-12 (IL-12; 4 ng/mL); and recombinant human IL-4 (IL-4; 40 ng/mL). These concentrations were the optimized values taken from dose–response curves (Figure 1). Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were cultivated at 2×105 cells/mL, where mixed lymphocytes (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs] + PBLs) were cultivated together at a ratio of 1:1 at 1×105 cells/mL for each. Incubation was carried out at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Figure 1

Dose–response curves for the lymphocyte cell densities of a healthy subject after treatment with different concentrations of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-12.

Notes: (A) Dose concentration with 4 ng/mL of IL-2 and IL-12 yield the maximal lymphocyte cell densities; (B) dose concentration with 40 ng/mL of IL-4 yield the maximal lymphocyte cell densities.

Abbreviation: IL, interleukin.

HCC patients were mainly categorized into two groups: group 1 included a set of patients in which isolated lymphocyte samples from the FNA and HPB were obtained from the same patient. The group was further divided into two classes: the first was concerned with a study of the lymphocytic mixture (TILs and PBLs) collected from both samples (group 1; class A); the second was concerned with a study of PBLs alone (group 1; class B). In both classes, three aliquots were cultured and propagated ex vivo with IL-2 for 48 hours. Further, two of these aliquots were subjected to either the addition of IL-4 or IL-12 and they were recultured for 72 hours. Group 2 included another set of patients in which HPB samples were the only source of isolated lymphocytes. In this group, two aliquots were studied for 72 hours for a comparison of the two different and initial combined IL treatments (IL-2/IL-4 and IL-2/IL-12).

Biochemical and immunological parameters

Detection of IFN-γ

Cell-free supernatants were collected and assayed for the human IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),15 according to the BMS228 ELISA manual (Bender MedSystems GmbH, Vienna, Austria). IFN-gamma standard was provided with the ELIZA kit in the form of a vial; its lyophilized content was dissolved by the addition of distilled water for the preparation of IFN-gamma standard concentration (200 ng/mL). External standard dilutions were prepared in seven tubes – one for each standard point. The 1:2 serial dilutions yielded standard concentrations ranging from 100.00 pg/mL to 1.56 pg/mL. Cell-free supernatants were diluted 1:2 (50 μL of the sample + 50 μL of the sample diluent). Aliquots of diluted supernatants of the samples and standard concentrations were loaded onto the ELISA plate in duplicate at 100 μL per well. The sample diluent served as a blank. A total of 50 μL of biotin conjugate was added to each well, followed by 2 hours of incubation at room temperature. After washing the microwell strips with wash buffer, 100 μL of diluted streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase was added, and this was followed by 1 hour of incubation at room temperature. After extensive washing, a color was developed by incubation with 100 μL of the substrate solution. After adding 100 μL of Stop Solution (Bender MedSystems GmbH), the optical density at 450 nm was determined for each well by a microplate reader. The concentration of samples read from the standard curve was multiplied by the dilution factor (×2). Sensitivity limits for the assay were <2 pg/mL (∼0.99 pg/mL).

Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocytes

Immunophenotyping (IPT) was carried out according to the protocol used in the Bone Marrow Unit, Clinical Pathology Department, National Cancer Institiute, Cairo University. The studied T-cell subpopulations were analyzed using Partec PAS-III flow cytometer (DakoCytomation, Münster, Germany). The studied cells were subjected to IPT analysis in terms of CD25–fluorescein isothiocyanate, CD8–phycoerythrin (PE), and CD4–PE–Cya-5.16 An example of the flow cytometric analysis and gating of the lymphocytes is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

An example of flow cytometric analysis and gating on lymphocytes.

Notes: (A) Gating on viable cultured lymphocytes. (B) Analysis and statistics showing CD3+ CD4+ T-cells. (C) Analysis and statistics differentiating CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells. (D) Analysis and statistics showing CD3+ CD8+ T-cells. (E) Analysis and statistics of CD3+ CD4+ T-cells showing the percentage of CD25+ T-cells.

Abbreviations: SSC, side scatter; FSC, forward scatter; FL, fluorescence parameter; CD, cluster of differentiation.

Reagents and chemicals

All tissue culture media contained RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany), and 100 U/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Biochrom). Separating of lymphocytes was conducted using Ficoll–Hypaque (Seromed, Biochrom KG, Berlin, Germany). IL-2 was purchased from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany), IL-4 was purchased from R&D Systems, Inc., (Minneapolis, MN, USA), and recombinant human Interleukin-12 (RH) IL-12 was purchased from Gibco® Invitrogen Corporartion (Camarillo, CA, USA). ELISA (Bender MedSystems GmbH) was used for the IFN-γ assays. Monoclonal antibodies anti-CD3, anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 obtained from DakoCytomation (Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK); anti-CD25 purchased from Fitzgerald Industries International (Acton, MA, USA) were used for the flow cytometric analysis.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of the data was carried out with the aid of SPSS package version 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). One-way analysis of variance was carried out to compare the means of patients and the control group under a normal distribution. The paired samples t-test was used to measure the effect of treatment on the samples within the same group or class. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Cell count and viability studies

For the PBLs, the cell viability was 95%–98% and the cell count was 1.15 million–1.75 million cell/mL, whereas for TILs the viability was 90%–95% and the cell count was 0.23 million–0.5 million cell/mL. TILs were assessed by a Partec PAS-III flow cytometer (DakoCytomation) using anti-CD3, anti-CD4, and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies, as reported previously.17

IFN-γ evaluation in culture supernatants

In our experiment, the effect of the addition of either IL-12 or IL-4 to IL-2 on IFN-γ secretion from lymphocytes was deliberated. For healthy control PBLs, the addition of IL-12 to IL-2 reflected the stimulatory effect which was represented by an elevation in IFN-γ levels; P<0.001 (Table 1). Reviewing the effect of the studied ILs on the secretory outcome of the mixed lymphocytes of the HCC samples, IL-2 + IL-4 yielded IFN-γ levels lower than that of IL-2; P<0.05; meanwhile, IL-2 + IL-12 showed the highest levels compared to either IL-2 + IL-4 or IL-2 alone; P<0.001 (Table 2; group 1, class A). Comparing the additive effect of IL-4 to IL-2, a non-significant increase of IFN-γ levels was shown in cultured PBLs (Table 2; group 1, class B), which opposed the significant decrease shown in mixed lymphocytes; P<0.05 (Table 2; group 1, class A). Regarding the initial combined treatment of HCC PBLs, IL-2 + IL-12 showed a significant increase of IFN-γ in relation to IL-2 + IL-4; P<0.05 (Table 3).

Table 1

Changes of IFN-γ levels within the control group according to treatment (paired t-test)

Control	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-12
Mean (pg/mL) ± SE	4.44±0.87	127.05±17.28
Range	1.6–9.3	77.0–241.0
P-value	<0.001

Abbreviations: IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; SE, standard error.

Table 2

IFN-γ levels released in the culture media of HCC samples subjected to treatment with IL-2, IL-4, and IL-12 (paired t-test)

HCC – mixed lymphocytes	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12
(Group 1, class A)
Mean (pg/mL) ± SE	21.55±2.64	14.27±1.90	40.85±4.64
Range	11.20–29.00	9.00–20.00	25.00–56.00
P-value	IL-2 + IL-4 versus IL-2; P<0.05IL-2 + IL-12 versus IL-2; P<0.001

Abbreviations: IFN, interferon; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IL, interleukin; SE, standard error; NS, not significant.

Table 3

A comparison of IFN-γ levels released in the culture media of HCC peripheral blood lymphocytes according to the two different initial combined treatments (analysis of variance)

HCC – peripheral blood lymphocytes	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12
Group 2
Mean (pg/mL) ± SE	80.0±10.83	130.44±19.94
Range	52.0–138.0	63.4–237.0
P-value	IL-2 + IL-12 versus IL-2 + IL-4; P<0.05

Abbreviations: IFN, interferon; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IL, interleukin.

Immunological characterization of the treated lymphocytes

In our study, phenotyping of the PBLs of healthy controls reflected the effect of the studied ILs on the immunological cell pattern, where the addition of IL-12 to IL-2 improved the percentage of CD4+ T-cells (P<0.001), declined that of CD4+CD25+ T-regs; P<0.05, and it showed a nonsignificant elevation in CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells (Table 4). The same theme was similarly represented in HCC samples, but the significant decrease shown in CD4+CD25+ T-regs either in the mixed lymphocytic population (P<0.05, Table 5; group 1, class A) or among PBLs (P<0.01, Table 5; group 1, class B) was accompanied by nonsignificant elevations in the corresponding percentages of both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells (Table 5).

Table 4

Changes in the phenotypic characterization within the control group according to treatment (paired t-test)

Control	CD4+		CD8+		CD4+ CD25+
	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-12	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-12	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-12
Mean (%) ± SE	49.58±0.83	57.86±1.04	22.25+2.73	28.6+1.27	1.33±0.08	0.86±0.11
Range	46.0–54.2	52.0–62.0	11.6–36.3	22.0–35.0	1.0–1.8	0.2–1.3
P-value	<0.001		NS		<0.05

Abbreviations: CD, cluster of differentiation; IL, interleukin; SE, standard error; NS, not significant.

Table 5

Percentages of the phenotypic characterization of HCC samples in relation to treatment with different ILs (paired t-test)

HCC – mixed lymphocytes	CD4+			CD8+			CD4+ CD25+
	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12	IL-2	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12
(Group 1, class A)
Mean (%) ± SE	37.62±2.79	21.8±3.7	40.82±2.37	21.4±6.8	18.5±3.2	30.1±7.5	2.27±0.34	5.3±0.5	0.87±0.19
Range	30.70–48.10	12.0–35.9	34.50–49.30	9.8–53.7	8.3–31.2	11.6–54.6	1.20–3.40	3.3–6.7	0.30–1.60
P-value	IL-2 versus IL-2 + IL-12: NSIL-2 versus IL-2 + IL-4 <0.01			IL-2 versus IL-2 + IL-12: NSIL-2 versus IL-2 + IL-4: NS			IL-2 versus IL-2 + IL-12 <0.05IL-2 versus IL-2 + IL-4 <0.001

Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CD, cluster of differentiation; IL, interleukin; SE, standard error; NS, not significant.

Regarding the additive effect of IL-4 in the cultured mixed lymphocytes, IL-4 in combination with IL-2 played a significant inhibitory role on CD4+ T-cells (P<0.01) and a significant stimulatory role on CD4+CD25+ production (P<0.001, Table 5; group 1, class A). However, no significant effect was shown in cultured PBLs (Table 5; group 1, class B).

Comparing the initial combined treatment with IL-2 + IL-12 on HCC PBLs, IL-2 + IL-4 revealed a significant elevation in the percentage of CD4+CD25+ T-regs (P<0.001; Table 6).

Table 6

Percentages of the phenotypic characterization of HCC peripheral blood lymphocytes in relation to treatment with two different initial combined treatments (analysis of variance)

HCC – peripheral blood lymphocytes	CD4+		CD8+		CD4+ CD25+
	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12	IL-2 + IL-4	IL-2 + IL-12
(Group 2)
Mean (%) ± SE	44.34±3.17	42.99±4.41	29.5±2.7	33.64±5.64	10.1±1.17	2.30±0.22
Range	31.4–55.9	23.4–62.3	23.1–42.7	12.1–48.5	6.3–14.5	1.5–3.1
P-value	NS		NS		<0.001

Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CD, cluster of differentiation; IL, interleukin; SE, standard error; NS, not significant.

Correlations of IFN-γ with IPT and cell count

In normal control cases, the treatment with IL-2 showed a direct correlation between CD4+ and IFN-γ (CD4+ versus IFN-γ; P=0.042), indicating the role of CD4+ cells in the normal secretion of IFN-γ. In HCC, IFN-γ levels were positively correlated with CD8+ cells during the cotreatment of IL-2 + IL-4 (P=0.033). Lymphocyte cell count was positively correlated with IFN-γ levels during the cotreatment of IL-2 + IL-12.

Discussion

This study offers a new approach for an immunological therapy targeted against liver cancer cells by optimizing conditions that can provide better antitumor immune effects using stimulated T-lymphocytes obtained from the FNA of HCC patients.

The discovery of T-regs has assisted in making outstanding progress in the research on TILs. T-regs play important roles in the deterioration of the antitumor effects of TILs both in in vivo and in vitro studies.18,19 The increased frequency of CD4+CD25+ T-cells in the CD3+ population among HCC patients was thought to be T-regs,19 which exhibited potent suppressive activity, as they inhibited the proliferative response of CD4+CD25− T-cells significantly upon T-cell receptor stimulation by IL-2.20

In our assay, the proportion of CD4+CD25+ T-regs in the peripheral blood of HCC patients was significantly elevated in comparison to healthy controls (P<0.0001). This elevation could be due to the secretion of inhibitory factors by the tumors, which may cause an expansion of T-regs, thereby inhibiting the secretion of IFN-γ.20,21 In agreement with our findings, Yang et al22 in 2006 found that T-regs were elevated in HCC liver tissues compared to autologous nontumor regions or normal control tissues. Another previous study23 stated that CD4+CD25+ T-cells exert potent immunoregulatory functions and are anergic toward T-cell receptor stimulation in the peripherals,23 which was in accordance with the phenomenon of increased migration of T-regs to the marginal regions of the tumor, and with the inhibition of autologous CD8+ T-cell proliferation.

It has been suggested that the application of IL-12 in combination with IL-2 may be a potent and useful therapeutic option for solid tumors.24 A study on lung cancer indicated that the synergism between IL-2 and IL-12 increased cytotoxic effects against target cancer cells by regulating cell-mediated antitumor immune responses.24 IL-12 signaling potentiates the ability of T-cells to become more sensitive to cytokines such as IL-2, which are important for ensuring potent antitumor activity and supporting and maintaining the in vivo proliferation of appropriately primed T-cells.25

The overwhelming role in IFN-γ secretion played by the subsequent addition of IL-12 to IL-2 was explained by the fact that IFN-γ secretion mainly depends on the P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and stress-activated protein kinase/Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathways, which are activated only by the combination of IL-2 and IL-12 in T-cells. These signaling pathways trigger the progressive expression of the IL-2-receptor on cytotoxic cells.26,27 Another explanation was that IL-2 and IL-12 synergize together to increase the half-life of IFN-γ messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), and this is only demonstrated at the level of mRNA stability inside the cytotoxic cells.28 Both ILs augmented the IFN-γ level and the production of other inflammatory cytokines via nonadherent mononuclear cells in a synergistic or cumulative manner.28

The study published by Sawayama et al28 in 2003 presented findings that were contrary to our results, where we found that the peripheral T-cells of healthy controls show a higher response to IL-2 + IL-12 for IFN-γ secretion than those of patients with HCC; an explanation that supports our results is a study by Ormandy et al in 2005 that explained how CD4+ CD25+ T-regs were accompanied with very low levels of IFN-g in HCC compared to healthy donors.21

Regarding the additive effect of IL-12 to IL-2, our results were supported by several studies.5,29,30 These studies on IL-2 and IL-12 gene-transfected HCC models specified that double gene transfection was much more effective than IL-2 gene therapy alone. The findings revealed that the magnitude of response of IFN-γ secretion counts on CD8+ T-cells percentages, highlighting the role of CD8+ cells in IL-12-induced tumor rejection.

Regarding the mode of action of IL-12, data from a prior study indicated that the use of IL-12 during in vitro priming significantly altered the phenotype, function, and memory formation of CD8+ T-cells. Increased expression of both the high-affinity IL-2R and its downstream transducer, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)5, clearly potentiated the IL-2 signal.25 This explanation supports the enhancement of IFN-γ secretion shown in our study.

A previous report stated that IL-12 mediates the selective expansion of inflammatory lymphocyte CD8+ cells, and that it has an inhibitory role on CD4+ cell propagation.31 Comparatively, we disagreed only in that CD4+ cell propagation was found to be non-significantly increased. However, a previous study published by Drescher et al32 in 2005 approved our results concerned with the increase in CD4+ cell propagation; where they stated that CD4+ TILs are required to be maintained within a certain ratio to CD8+ T-cells to function optimally. This ratio is the key to appropriate TIL function.

In our study, the addition of IL-12 to IL-2 caused a significant decrease in CD4+CD25+ T-regs and a slight increase in CD4+CD25− T-cells among HCC patients. This could be explained by the previous hypothesis that IL-12 might antagonize the suppressive T-regs through its stimulatory role on CD4+ T-cells.20 In healthy controls, the addition of IL-12 to IL-2 showed a significant increase in CD4+CD25- T-cells and this could be explained by that peripheral blood of healthy controls show lower levels of suppressive CD4+CD25+ T-regs compared to HCC cases.19,22

Our study showed that IL-4 antagonizes IL-2 in IFN-γ secretion, which is in accordance with a previous report, which stated that the addition of IL-4 to IL-2 in cultured lymphocytes did not result in improving the antitumor effector function in long-term TIL cultures from liver tumors.33 In addition, our results agreed with a study published by Castro et al34 in 1999 which stated that the reduced IFN-γ level is explained by the inhibitory effect of IL-4 which has been shown to specifically suppress IL-2-induced STAT5 activation in human T-cells and this is a putative mechanism for IL-4 antagonism of Th1 development. Nonetheless, in murine models, researchers reported a contradicting result, as they showed that IL-4 played a synergistic role with IL-2 in the activation of cytotoxic cells to secrete IFN-γ in the mixed lymphocyte cultures.35 In addition, IL-4 augmented the proliferation of IL-2-activated TIL clones. IL-4 upregulated the IL-2 receptor; consequently, signal transduction was augmented, and the proliferation of TILs was enhanced by IL-4 via the action of the IL-2/IL-2 receptor system.36 Further studies are needed to compare the mechanism of action of IL-4 in human and murine models.

On the other hand, several studies have agreed with our results, including a study by Shimizu et al33 that was conducted in 1991, showing that the cytotoxicity of CD8+ cells that originated from liver TILs treated with IL-2 + IL-4 was very low or even undetectable compared to the cytotoxicity noted following treatment with IL-2 alone. Another study has specified that the clonal expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes was noted after IL-2 addition, but not IL-2 + IL-4 combined addition.37 Moreover, a previous report stated that the presence of IL-4 significantly downregulated IFN-γ production by IL-2-stimulated cells that were obtained from human healthy volunteers.38

Conclusion

This study has elucidated the idea that the combination of IL-12 and IL-2 has a synergistic effect. Contrary to IL-12, IL-4 has an antagonistic effect in terms of the cytotoxicity of lymphocytes. The mixed lymphocytic population that originated from TILs and PBLs showed a better response whenever they were activated by the subsequent addition of IL-12 to IL-2.