Emma Xuxiao Zhang1, Olivia Seen Huey Oh1, Wanhan See1, Pream Raj1, Lyn James1, Kamran Khan2, Jeannie Su Hui Tey1. 1. Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, Public Health Group, Ministry of Health, Singapore . 2. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the public health risk to Singapore posed by the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in the Republic of Korea in 2015. METHODS: The likelihood of importation of MERS cases and the magnitude of the public health impact in Singapore were assessed to determine overall risk. Literature on the epidemiology and contextual factors associated with MERS coronavirus infection was collected and reviewed. Connectivity between the Republic of Korea and Singapore was analysed. Public health measures implemented by the two countries were reviewed. RESULTS: The epidemiology of the 2015 MERS outbreak in the Republic of Korea remained similar to the MERS outbreaks in Saudi Arabia. In addition, strong infection control and response measures were effective in controlling the outbreak. In view of the air traffic between Singapore and MERS-affected areas, importation of MERS cases into Singapore is possible. Nonetheless, the risk of a serious public health impact to Singapore in the event of an imported case of MERS would be mitigated by its strong health-care system and established infection control practices. DISCUSSION: The MERS outbreak was sparked by an exported case from the Middle East, which remains a concern as the reservoir of infection (thought to be camels) continues to exist in the Middle East, and sporadic cases in the community and outbreaks in health-care settings continue to occur there. This risk assessment highlights the need for Singapore to stay vigilant and to continue enhancing core public health capacities to detect and respond to MERS coronavirus.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the public health risk to Singapore posed by the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in the Republic of Korea in 2015. METHODS: The likelihood of importation of MERS cases and the magnitude of the public health impact in Singapore were assessed to determine overall risk. Literature on the epidemiology and contextual factors associated with MERS coronavirus infection was collected and reviewed. Connectivity between the Republic of Korea and Singapore was analysed. Public health measures implemented by the two countries were reviewed. RESULTS: The epidemiology of the 2015 MERS outbreak in the Republic of Korea remained similar to the MERS outbreaks in Saudi Arabia. In addition, strong infection control and response measures were effective in controlling the outbreak. In view of the air traffic between Singapore and MERS-affected areas, importation of MERS cases into Singapore is possible. Nonetheless, the risk of a serious public health impact to Singapore in the event of an imported case of MERS would be mitigated by its strong health-care system and established infection control practices. DISCUSSION: The MERS outbreak was sparked by an exported case from the Middle East, which remains a concern as the reservoir of infection (thought to be camels) continues to exist in the Middle East, and sporadic cases in the community and outbreaks in health-care settings continue to occur there. This risk assessment highlights the need for Singapore to stay vigilant and to continue enhancing core public health capacities to detect and respond to MERS coronavirus.
Authors: A Bermingham; M A Chand; C S Brown; E Aarons; C Tong; C Langrish; K Hoschler; K Brown; M Galiano; R Myers; R G Pebody; H K Green; N L Boddington; R Gopal; N Price; W Newsholme; C Drosten; R A Fouchier; M Zambon Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2012-10-04
Authors: Abdullah Assiri; Allison McGeer; Trish M Perl; Connie S Price; Abdullah A Al Rabeeah; Derek A T Cummings; Zaki N Alabdullatif; Maher Assad; Abdulmohsen Almulhim; Hatem Makhdoom; Hossam Madani; Rafat Alhakeem; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Matthew Cotten; Simon J Watson; Paul Kellam; Alimuddin I Zumla; Ziad A Memish Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jin Yong Kim; Joon Young Song; Young Kyung Yoon; Seong-Ho Choi; Young Goo Song; Sung-Ran Kim; Hee-Jung Son; Sun-Young Jeong; Jung-Hwa Choi; Kyung Mi Kim; Hee Jung Yoon; Jun Yong Choi; Tae Hyong Kim; Young Hwa Choi; Hong Bin Kim; Ji Hyun Yoon; Jacob Lee; Joong Sik Eom; Sang-Oh Lee; Won Sup Oh; Jung-Hyun Choi; Jin-Hong Yoo; Woo Joo Kim; Hee Jin Cheong Journal: Infect Chemother Date: 2015-12-30
Authors: Simon Cauchemez; Christophe Fraser; Maria D Van Kerkhove; Christl A Donnelly; Steven Riley; Andrew Rambaut; Vincent Enouf; Sylvie van der Werf; Neil M Ferguson Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Zulaikha M Al Hammadi; Daniel K W Chu; Yassir M Eltahir; Farida Al Hosani; Mariam Al Mulla; Wasim Tarnini; Aron J Hall; Ranawaka A P M Perera; Mohamed M Abdelkhalek; J S M Peiris; Salama S Al Muhairi; Leo L M Poon Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Elisa Rubio; Miguel J Martínez; Verónica Gonzalo; Josep Barrachina; Núria Torner; Ana I Martínez; Mireia Jané; Anna Vilella; Ana Del Rio; Natalia Rodriguez-Valero; Maria Jesús Pinazo; José Muñoz; Alex Soriano; Antoni Trilla; Jordi Vila; Ma Ángeles Marcos Journal: J Travel Med Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 8.490