| Literature DB >> 27507822 |
Amaya L Bustinduy1, David Waterhouse2, Jose C de Sousa-Figueiredo3, Stephen A Roberts4, Aaron Atuhaire5, Govert J Van Dam6, Paul L A M Corstjens7, Janet T Scott8, Michelle C Stanton2, Narcis B Kabatereine5, Stephen Ward2, William W Hope8, J Russell Stothard2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Each year, millions of African children receive praziquantel (PZQ) by mass drug administration (MDA) to treat schistosomiasis at a standard single dose of 40 mg/kg of body weight, a direct extrapolation from studies of adults. A higher dose of 60 mg/kg is also acceptable for refractory cases. We conducted the first PZQ pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study in young children comparing dosing. Sixty Ugandan children aged 3 to 8 years old with egg patent Schistosoma mansoni received PZQ at either 40 mg/kg or 60 mg/kg. PK parameters of PZQ racemate and enantiomers (R and S) were quantified. PD outcomes were assessed by standard fecal egg counts and novel schistosome-specific serum (circulating anodic antigen [CAA]) and urine (circulating cathodic antigen [CCA]) antigen assays. Population PK and PD analyses were performed to estimate drug exposure in individual children, and the relationship between drug exposure and parasitological cure was estimated using logistic regression. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify better, future dosing regimens. There was marked PK variability between children, but the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of PZQ was strongly predictive of the parasitological cure rate (CR). Although no child achieved antigenic cure, which is suggestive of an important residual adult worm burden, higher AUC was associated with greater CAA antigenic decline at 24 days. To optimize the performance of PZQ, analysis of our simulations suggest that higher doses (>60 mg/kg) are needed, particularly in smaller children. IMPORTANCE: Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease, typically associated with chronic morbidity, and its control is a global health priority. Praziquantel (PZQ) is the only available antiparasitic drug and is often given out, as a single oral dose (40 mg/kg), to school-aged children by mass drug administration (MDA) schemes operating within preventive chemotherapy campaigns as endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO). This current strategy has several limitations. (i) It excludes preschool children who can be patently infected. (ii) It delivers PZQ at a dose directly extrapolated from adult pharmacological studies. To address these problems, we conducted the first pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of young children within an area of Uganda where Schistosoma mansoni is hyperendemic. Our results demonstrate that a higher dose (>60 mg/kg) is required, especially in smaller children, and draw attention to the need for further optimization of PZQ treatment based on schistosome antigenic assays, which are more sensitive to pharmacodynamic markers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27507822 PMCID: PMC4992966 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00227-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Design and basic methodology of the study. The SIMI cohort refers to the Schistosomiasis in Mothers and Infant Study.
Baseline characteristics of children enrolled in the study
| Characteristic | Total no. of children | No. of children or parameter value for children given the following praziquantel dose: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 mg/kg | 60 mg/kg | |||
| Demography | ||||
| Bugoigo village | 23 | 11 | 12 | >0.99 |
| Walukuba village | 37 | 19 | 18 | |
| Age, yr [mean (range)] | 60 | 6.4 (3–8) | 6.3 (3–8) | 0.79 |
| 3- to 5-year-old (preschool) | 17 | 7 | 10 | 0.49 |
| 6- to 8-year-old (school-aged) | 43 | 23 | 20 | |
| Females | 38 | 19 | 19 | >0.99 |
| Males | 22 | 11 | 11 | |
| Wt, kg [mean (range)] | 60 | 21.8 (15–30) | 23.0 (15.1–34) | 0.26 |
| Ht, cm [mean (range)] | 60 | 119.4 (101–138) | 118.8 (101–139) | 0.80 |
| Hematology | ||||
| Hemoglobin [mean (95% CI)] | 59 | 10.6 (7.3–14.7) | 11.3 (10.8–11.8) | 0.048 |
| Anemia | 59 | 23 | 14 | 0.062 |
| Parasitic infection | ||||
| | 60 | 950.4 (324–1,576) | 491.0 (249–733) | 0.19 |
| Heavy (>400 epg) | 23 | 12 | 11 | 1.0 |
| Medium (100–399 epg) | 17 | 8 | 9 | |
| Light (1–100 epg) | 19 | 9 | 10 | 0.015 |
| No eggs (CCA-positive) | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| CCA in urine | ||||
| + | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0.785 |
| ++ | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0.613 |
| +++ | 33 | 16 | 17 | >0.99 |
| NA | 5 | 3 | 2 | |
| CAA concn in plasma, pg/ml | 55 | 56746 (100–100,839) | 43,217 (224–185,672) | 0.39 |
| Malaria SD RDT | ||||
| + | 32 | 16 | 16 | |
| ++ | 13 | 7 | 6 | |
| Negative | 14 | 7 | 7 | |
| NA | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Abbreviations: CCA, circulating cathodic antigen; CAA, circulating anodic antigen; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NA, not available; RDT, rapid diagnostic text.
P value is the difference between groups by Fisher exact test or Student’s t test.
Anemia defined here as hemoglobin level of <11.5 g/dl.
FIG 2 Individual PZQ levels by dosing arm. (A) S-PZQ and (B) R-PZQ. The 40-mg/kg dosing arm is indicated in blue, and the 60-mg/kg dosing arm is indicated in red.
Pharmacokinetic parameter values derived from the 60 children receiving two different doses of praziquantel
| Dose and PZF | AUC0-∞ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 mg/kg | |||||
| | 581.3 (677) | 3.33 (2.7–3.9) | 2.62 (2.8) | 2.96 (2.2) | 0.07 (0.2) |
| | 131.1 (238) | 3.28 (2.6–3.9) | 0.50 (0.59) | 3.48 (2.3) | 0.46 (0.7) |
| 60 mg/kg | |||||
| | 695.56 (810) | 3.23 (2.6–3.8) | 2.58 (2.5) | 3.02 (1.7) | 0.13 (0.35) |
| | 144.95 (185) | 3.13 (2.6–3.6) | 0.43 (0.23) | 4.36 (4.7) | 0.72 (0.88) |
Values are means, with standard deviations shown in parentheses. The values in parentheses for Tmax show range. Abbreviations: Cmax, maximum concentration of drug in serum; Tmax, time to maximum concentration of drug in serum; t1/2, half-life; Tlag, lag time (time delay between drug administration and first observed concentration above the lower limit of quantification in plasma).
Population pharmacokinetic parameter values derived from the 59 children receiving praziquantel
| Pharmacokinetic parameter | Mean | Median | SD | CV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.89 | 9.88 | 13.31 | 89.36 | |
| SCL/ | 608.02 | 677.59 | 320.10 | 52.65 |
| 473.97 | 503.90 | 244.80 | 51.65 | |
| 25.90 | 22.28 | 18.89 | 72.92 | |
| 33.30 | 25.71 | 26.08 | 78.32 | |
| 1.94 | 1.67 | 1.13 | 58.34 |
Abbreviations: K, first-order rate constant connecting the gut with the bloodstream; SCL, clearance of PZQ; Kcp and Kpc, first-order compartmental transfer rate constants connecting the central and peripheral compartments; V, volume of the central compartment; F, oral bioavailability of PZQ, which was not estimated in this study; CV%, coefficient of variation as a percentage.
FIG 3 Observed versus predicted values before (A) and after (B) the Bayesian step.
Egg reduction rate and cure rate for S. mansoni egg output at 24-day follow-up
| PZQ dose | ERR (%) | CR (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 40 mg/kg | 82 [70–90] | 70 [52–83] |
| 60 mg/kg | 91 [74–98] | 82 [64–92] |
| 0.24 | 0.36 |
Abbreviations: ERR, egg reduction rate; CR, cure rate; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
95% CI and difference in rates computed using quasibinomial model.
Exact binomial 95% CI calculated by Fisher’s exact test.
Effects of disease burden, sex, weight, and drug on cure rate
| Factor or parameter | Unadjusted OR | Adjusted OR | AIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) | 0.047 | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) | 0.047 | |
| Females | 3.18 (0.89–11.3) | 0.068 | 3.65 (0.94–14.2) | 0.056 | |
| Wt (per kg) | 1.28 (1.04–1.57) | 0.016 | 1.27 (1.03–1.57) | 0.022 | |
| PZQ dose (per mg/kg) | 1.03 (0.97–1.10) | 0.29 | 1.02 (0.96–1.09) | 0.48 | 64.8 |
| 1.67 (0.85–3.30) | 0.13 | 1.57 (0.77–3.20) | 0.20 | 63.6 | |
| 2.98 (1.40–6.32) | 0.004 | 2.99 (1.36–6.59) | 0.005 | ||
| Total PZQ AUC (log) | 2.31 (1.21–4.40) | 0.009 | 2.24 (1.15–4.37) | 0.015 | 58.0 |
Logistic regression unadjusted and adjusted for baseline S. mansoni severity of infection.
OR, odds ratio. The 95% CI values are shown in parentheses.
The adjusted odds ratio (OR) was adjusted for baseline severity only. The 95% CI values are shown in parentheses.
The Akaike information criterion (AIC) values of the fitted models are shown for the various dose measures; lower values indicates a better fit, and differences of 2 to 6 would be regarded as positive evidence in favor of the selected dose measure. while >6 would constitute strong evidence in favor of that measure. The chosen model for simulations based on the best AIC is shown in boldface type.
FIG 4 Individual CAA levels at baseline and 4 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 24 days post-PZQ for the two dose levels.
FIG 5 Model with individual cure rates as outcomes adjusted for infection intensity and PZQ AUC. The model estimated cure actual patient data (n = 60) for the doses given in the study (40 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg) are shown in blue. Data for simulated patients (n = 5,000) for three different doses (40 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg, and 80 mg/kg) are shown in black. Error bars on the simulation results represent the uncertainty (interquartile range) in the simulation due to parameter variability. The shaded area indicates the WHO target of a >85% cure rate.