Literature DB >> 27507077

Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review.

Rebecca K Runting1,2, Brett A Bryan3, Laura E Dee4, Fleur J F Maseyk2,5, Lisa Mandle6, Perrine Hamel6, Kerrie A Wilson2,5, Kathleen Yetka1, Hugh P Possingham2,5, Jonathan R Rhodes1,2.   

Abstract

Climate change is having a significant impact on ecosystem services and is likely to become increasingly important as this phenomenon intensifies. Future impacts can be difficult to assess as they often involve long timescales, dynamic systems with high uncertainties, and are typically confounded by other drivers of change. Despite a growing literature on climate change impacts on ecosystem services, no quantitative syntheses exist. Hence, we lack an overarching understanding of the impacts of climate change, how they are being assessed, and the extent to which other drivers, uncertainties, and decision making are incorporated. To address this, we systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change impacts on ecosystem services at subglobal scales. We found that the impact of climate change on most types of services was predominantly negative (59% negative, 24% mixed, 4% neutral, 13% positive), but varied across services, drivers, and assessment methods. Although uncertainty was usually incorporated, there were substantial gaps in the sources of uncertainty included, along with the methods used to incorporate them. We found that relatively few studies integrated decision making, and even fewer studies aimed to identify solutions that were robust to uncertainty. For management or policy to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services, integrated approaches that incorporate multiple drivers of change and account for multiple sources of uncertainty are needed. This is undoubtedly a challenging task, but ignoring these complexities can result in misleading assessments of the impacts of climate change, suboptimal management outcomes, and the inefficient allocation of resources for climate adaptation.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  carbon sequestration; cumulative impacts; decision making; food provision; global change; global warming; land use change; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27507077     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  13 in total

Review 1.  A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a "QOL-Climate" assessment framework.

Authors:  Ronald C Estoque; Takuya Togawa; Makoto Ooba; Kei Gomi; Shogo Nakamura; Yasuaki Hijioka; Yasuko Kameyama
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 2.  Assessing climate change risks to the natural environment to facilitate cross-sectoral adaptation policy.

Authors:  Iain Brown
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A heteroskedastic model of Park Grass spring hay yields in response to weather suggests continuing yield decline with climate change in future decades.

Authors:  John W G Addy; Richard H Ellis; Chloe MacLaren; Andy J Macdonald; Mikhail A Semenov; Andrew Mead
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 4.  Blue-Green Infrastructure for Flood and Water Quality Management in Southeast Asia: Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Perrine Hamel; Leanne Tan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.644

5.  Assessing ecosystem service provision under climate change to support conservation and development planning in Myanmar.

Authors:  Lisa Mandle; Stacie Wolny; Nirmal Bhagabati; Hanna Helsingen; Perrine Hamel; Ryan Bartlett; Adam Dixon; Radley Horton; Corey Lesk; Danielle Manley; Manishka De Mel; Daniel Bader; Sai Nay Won Myint; Win Myint; Myat Su Mon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Forest productivity mitigates human disturbance effects on late-seral prey exposed to apparent competitors and predators.

Authors:  Daniel Fortin; Florian Barnier; Pierre Drapeau; Thierry Duchesne; Claude Dussault; Sandra Heppell; Marie-Caroline Prima; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent; Guillaume Szor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Trade-offs between temporal stability and level of forest ecosystem services provisioning under climate change.

Authors:  Katharina Albrich; Werner Rammer; Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.105

8.  Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services.

Authors:  Xinmin Zhang; Ronald C Estoque; Hualin Xie; Yuji Murayama; Manjula Ranagalage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Water Availability-Demand Balance under Climate Change Scenarios in an Overpopulated Region of Mexico.

Authors:  Jessica Bravo-Cadena; Numa P Pavón; Patricia Balvanera; Gerardo Sánchez-Rojas; Ramón Razo-Zarate
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.

Authors:  Jesse D Gourevitch; Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez; Natalia Aristizábal; Luz A de Wit; Eva Kinnebrew; Caitlin E Littlefield; Maya Moore; Charles C Nicholson; Aaron J Schwartz; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.