Molly P Jarman1, Renan C Castillo2, Anthony R Carlini2, Lisa M Kodadek3, Adil H Haider4. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mjarman2@jhu.edu. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 4. Division of Trauma, Burn and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Barriers to trauma care for rural populations are well documented, but little is known about the magnitude of urban-rural disparities in injury mortality. This study sought to quantify differences in injury mortality comparing rural and nonrural residents with traumatic injuries. METHODS: Using data from the 2009-2010 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate odds of death after traumatic injury for rural residents compared with nonrural residents, while controlling for age, sex, injury type and severity, comorbidities, trauma designation, and Census region. RESULTS: Rural residents were 14% more likely to die after traumatic injury compared with nonrural residents (P < .001). Increased odds of death for rural residents were observed at level I (odds ratio = 1.20, P < .001), level II (odds ratio = 1.34, P < .001), and level IV/nontrauma centers (odds ratio = 1.23, P < .001). The disparity was greatest for injuries occurring in the South and Midwest (odds ratio = 1.54, P < .001 and odds ratio = 2.06, P < .001, respectively) and for cases with an injury severity score <9 or unknown severity (odds ratio = 2.09, P < .001 and odds ratio = 1.31, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Rural residents are significantly more likely than nonrural residents to die after traumatic injury. This disparity varies by trauma center designation, injury severity, and US Census region. Distance and time to treatment likely play a role in rural injury outcomes, along with regional differences in prehospital care and trauma system organization.
BACKGROUND: Barriers to trauma care for rural populations are well documented, but little is known about the magnitude of urban-rural disparities in injury mortality. This study sought to quantify differences in injury mortality comparing rural and nonrural residents with traumatic injuries. METHODS: Using data from the 2009-2010 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate odds of death after traumatic injury for rural residents compared with nonrural residents, while controlling for age, sex, injury type and severity, comorbidities, trauma designation, and Census region. RESULTS: Rural residents were 14% more likely to die after traumatic injury compared with nonrural residents (P < .001). Increased odds of death for rural residents were observed at level I (odds ratio = 1.20, P < .001), level II (odds ratio = 1.34, P < .001), and level IV/nontrauma centers (odds ratio = 1.23, P < .001). The disparity was greatest for injuries occurring in the South and Midwest (odds ratio = 1.54, P < .001 and odds ratio = 2.06, P < .001, respectively) and for cases with an injury severity score <9 or unknown severity (odds ratio = 2.09, P < .001 and odds ratio = 1.31, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Rural residents are significantly more likely than nonrural residents to die after traumatic injury. This disparity varies by trauma center designation, injury severity, and US Census region. Distance and time to treatment likely play a role in rural injury outcomes, along with regional differences in prehospital care and trauma system organization.
Authors: Peter T Pons; Jason S Haukoos; Whitney Bludworth; Thomas Cribley; Kathryn A Pons; Vincent J Markovchick Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Lia I Losonczy; P Logan Weygandt; Cassandra V Villegas; Erin C Hall; Eric B Schneider; Lisa A Cooper; Edward E Cornwell; Elliott R Haut; David T Efron; Adil H Haider Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2014-02
Authors: Demetrios Demetriades; Matthew Martin; Ali Salim; Peter Rhee; Carlos Brown; Jay Doucet; Linda Chan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2005-12-19 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Macarena C Garcia; Mark Faul; Nicole F Dowling; Cheryll C Thomas; Michael F Iademarco Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Gretchen C Edwards; Sandra L Wong; Maria C Russell; Emily R Winslow; Virginia O Shaffer; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jefferson T Barrett; Lois K Lee; Michael C Monuteaux; Caitlin A Farrell; Jennifer A Hoffmann; Eric W Fleegler Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: James M Bardes; Bradley S Price; Donald A Adjeroh; Gianfranco Doretto; Alison Wilson Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Peter C Jenkins; Lava Timsina; Patrick Murphy; Christopher Tignanelli; Daniel N Holena; Mark R Hemmila; Craig Newgard Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Andrew-Paul Deeb; Heather M Phelos; Andrew B Peitzman; Timothy R Billiar; Jason L Sperry; Joshua B Brown Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.697