Literature DB >> 27505694

The role of age, working memory, and response inhibition in deviance distraction: A cross-sectional study.

Alicia Leiva1, Pilar Andrés1, Mateu Servera1, Frederick Verbruggen2, Fabrice B R Parmentier1.   

Abstract

Sounds deviating from an otherwise repeated or structured sequence capture attention and affect performance in an ongoing visual task negatively, testament to the balance between selective attention and change detection. Although deviance distraction has been the object of much research, its modulation across the life span has been more scarcely addressed. Recent findings suggest possible connections with working memory and response inhibition. In this study we measured the performance of children and young and older adults in a cross-modal oddball task (deviance distraction), a working memory task (working memory capacity), and a response inhibition task (ability to voluntarily inhibit an already planned action) with the aim to establish the contribution of the latter 2 to the first. Older adults exhibited significantly more deviance distraction than children and young adults (who did not differ from each other). Working memory capacity mediated deviance distraction in children and older adults (though in opposite directions) but not in young adults. Response inhibition capacities did not mediate deviance distraction in any of the age groups. Altogether the results suggest that although the increase in deviance distraction observed in old age may partly reflect the relative impairment of working memory mechanisms, there is no straightforward and stable relation between working memory capacity and deviance distraction across the life span. Furthermore, our results indicate that deviance distraction is unlikely to reflect the temporary inhibition of responses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27505694     DOI: 10.1037/dev0000163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  5 in total

1.  Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Antonia P Pacheco-Unguetti; Sara Valero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Bernhard Angele; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott; John E Marsh; Jenna Zeringue; Corey I McGill
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

4.  Age Effects on Distraction in a Visual Task Requiring Fast Reactions: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Petia Kojouharova; Zsófia Anna Gaál; Boglárka Nagy; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Distraction of attention by novel sounds in children declines fast.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Andreas Widmann; Florian Scharf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.