OBJECTIVE: There has been growing interest in the role that implicit processing of drug cues can play in motivating drug use behavior. However, the extent to which drug cue processing biases relate to the processing biases exhibited to other types of evocative stimuli is largely unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine how the implicit cognitive processing of smoking cues relates to the processing of affective cues using a novel paradigm. METHOD: Smokers (n = 50) and nonsmokers (n = 38) completed a picture-viewing task, in which participants were presented with a series of smoking, pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral images while engaging in a distractor task designed to direct controlled resources away from conscious processing of image content. Electroencephalogram recordings were obtained throughout the task for extraction of event-related potentials (ERPs). RESULTS: Smokers exhibited differential processing of smoking cues across 3 different ERP indices compared with nonsmokers. Comparable effects were found for pleasant cues on 2 of these indices. Late cognitive processing of smoking and pleasant cues was associated with nicotine dependence and cigarette use. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that cognitive biases may extend across classes of stimuli among smokers. This raises important questions about the fundamental meaning of cognitive biases, and suggests the need to consider generalized cognitive biases in theories of drug use behavior and interventions based on cognitive bias modification. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: There has been growing interest in the role that implicit processing of drug cues can play in motivating drug use behavior. However, the extent to which drug cue processing biases relate to the processing biases exhibited to other types of evocative stimuli is largely unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine how the implicit cognitive processing of smoking cues relates to the processing of affective cues using a novel paradigm. METHOD: Smokers (n = 50) and nonsmokers (n = 38) completed a picture-viewing task, in which participants were presented with a series of smoking, pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral images while engaging in a distractor task designed to direct controlled resources away from conscious processing of image content. Electroencephalogram recordings were obtained throughout the task for extraction of event-related potentials (ERPs). RESULTS: Smokers exhibited differential processing of smoking cues across 3 different ERP indices compared with nonsmokers. Comparable effects were found for pleasant cues on 2 of these indices. Late cognitive processing of smoking and pleasant cues was associated with nicotine dependence and cigarette use. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that cognitive biases may extend across classes of stimuli among smokers. This raises important questions about the fundamental meaning of cognitive biases, and suggests the need to consider generalized cognitive biases in theories of drug use behavior and interventions based on cognitive bias modification. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Megan E Piper; Thomas M Piasecki; E Belle Federman; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2004-04
Authors: David E Evans; Nathan D Maxfield; Kate Janse Van Rensburg; Jason A Oliver; Kade G Jentink; David J Drobes Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: A P Anokhin; A B Vedeniapin; E J Sirevaag; L O Bauer; S J O'Connor; S Kuperman; B Porjesz; T Reich; H Begleiter; J Polich; J W Rohrbaugh Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Edward F Jackson; Vincent D Costa; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Victoria L Brown; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Jennifer A Minnix; Francesco Versace; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Yong Cui; Victoria L Brown; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Menton M Deweese; Jason D Robinson; Charles E Green; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Maher A Karam-Hage; David W Wetter; Susan M Schembre; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Menton M Deweese; Maurizio Codispoti; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kyla D Gibney; George Kypriotakis; Paul M Cinciripini; Jason D Robinson; Jennifer A Minnix; Francesco Versace Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Francesco Versace; Elise M Stevens; Jason D Robinson; Yong Cui; Menton M Deweese; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Charles E Green; Maher Karam-Hage; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jason A Oliver; Lauren R Pacek; Erin N Locey; Laura M Fish; Peter S Hendricks; Kathryn I Pollak Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jason A Oliver; Maggie M Sweitzer; Matthew M Engelhard; Matthew B Hallyburton; Kurt M Ribisl; Francis Joseph McClernon Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 4.093
Authors: Francesco Versace; David W Frank; Elise M Stevens; Menton M Deweese; Michele Guindani; Susan M Schembre Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2018-12-16 Impact factor: 4.016