Literature DB >> 27505209

Smokers exhibit biased neural processing of smoking and affective images.

Jason A Oliver1, Kade G Jentink1, David J Drobes1, David E Evans1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There has been growing interest in the role that implicit processing of drug cues can play in motivating drug use behavior. However, the extent to which drug cue processing biases relate to the processing biases exhibited to other types of evocative stimuli is largely unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine how the implicit cognitive processing of smoking cues relates to the processing of affective cues using a novel paradigm.
METHOD: Smokers (n = 50) and nonsmokers (n = 38) completed a picture-viewing task, in which participants were presented with a series of smoking, pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral images while engaging in a distractor task designed to direct controlled resources away from conscious processing of image content. Electroencephalogram recordings were obtained throughout the task for extraction of event-related potentials (ERPs).
RESULTS: Smokers exhibited differential processing of smoking cues across 3 different ERP indices compared with nonsmokers. Comparable effects were found for pleasant cues on 2 of these indices. Late cognitive processing of smoking and pleasant cues was associated with nicotine dependence and cigarette use.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that cognitive biases may extend across classes of stimuli among smokers. This raises important questions about the fundamental meaning of cognitive biases, and suggests the need to consider generalized cognitive biases in theories of drug use behavior and interventions based on cognitive bias modification. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27505209      PMCID: PMC5796754          DOI: 10.1037/hea0000350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  13 in total

Review 1.  Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches.

Authors:  Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.067

2.  A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68).

Authors:  Megan E Piper; Thomas M Piasecki; E Belle Federman; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-04

3.  Cognitive manifestations of drinking-smoking associations: preliminary findings with a cross-primed Stroop task.

Authors:  Jason A Oliver; David J Drobes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Nicotine deprivation influences P300 markers of cognitive control.

Authors:  David E Evans; Nathan D Maxfield; Kate Janse Van Rensburg; Jason A Oliver; Kade G Jentink; David J Drobes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Electrophysiological indices of biased cognitive processing of substance-related cues: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marianne Littel; Anja S Euser; Marcus R Munafò; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The P300 brain potential is reduced in smokers.

Authors:  A P Anokhin; A B Vedeniapin; E J Sirevaag; L O Bauer; S J O'Connor; S Kuperman; B Porjesz; T Reich; H Begleiter; J Polich; J W Rohrbaugh
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Do brain responses to emotional images and cigarette cues differ? An fMRI study in smokers.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Edward F Jackson; Vincent D Costa; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Victoria L Brown; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse.

Authors:  Matt Field; Marcus R Munafò; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The late positive potential (LPP) in response to varying types of emotional and cigarette stimuli in smokers: a content comparison.

Authors:  Jennifer A Minnix; Francesco Versace; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Yong Cui; Victoria L Brown; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  The neural basis of drug stimulus processing and craving: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Lee Hogarth
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Cue Reactivity: Non-Drug-Related Motivationally Relevant Stimuli Are Necessary to Understand Reactivity to Drug-Related Cues.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Menton M Deweese; Jason D Robinson; Charles E Green; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Maher A Karam-Hage; David W Wetter; Susan M Schembre; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Cigarette cues capture attention of smokers and never-smokers, but for different reasons.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Maurizio Codispoti; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Estimating statistical power for event-related potential studies using the late positive potential.

Authors:  Kyla D Gibney; George Kypriotakis; Paul M Cinciripini; Jason D Robinson; Jennifer A Minnix; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Brain Responses to Cigarette-Related and Emotional Images in Smokers During Smoking Cessation: No Effect of Varenicline or Bupropion on the Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Elise M Stevens; Jason D Robinson; Yong Cui; Menton M Deweese; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Charles E Green; Maher Karam-Hage; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Lack of utility of cigarettes per day cutoffs for clinical and laboratory smoking research.

Authors:  Jason A Oliver; Lauren R Pacek; Erin N Locey; Laura M Fish; Peter S Hendricks; Kathryn I Pollak
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Identifying neural signatures of tobacco retail outlet exposure: Preliminary validation of a "community neuroscience" paradigm.

Authors:  Jason A Oliver; Maggie M Sweitzer; Matthew M Engelhard; Matthew B Hallyburton; Kurt M Ribisl; Francis Joseph McClernon
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.093

7.  The reality of "food porn": Larger brain responses to food-related cues than to erotic images predict cue-induced eating.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; David W Frank; Elise M Stevens; Menton M Deweese; Michele Guindani; Susan M Schembre
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 4.016

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.