Literature DB >> 27505208

Implicit stigmatization-related biases in individuals with skin conditions and their significant others.

Sylvia van Beugen1, Joyce Maas2, Antoinette I M van Laarhoven1, Tessel E Galesloot3, Mike Rinck2, Eni S Becker2, Peter C M van de Kerkhof4, Henriët van Middendorp1, Andrea W M Evers1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Stigmatization is common in people with chronic skin conditions and may also affect their significant others (SOs). The fast and implicit processing of stigmatization-related stimuli has received little attention in these populations; however, such knowledge may offer indications for new treatment methods. This study aimed to investigate implicit processing of stigmatization-related stimuli in people with skin conditions and their SOs.
METHOD: A modified Stroop task and 2 approach-avoidance tasks were administered to participants with chronic skin conditions (alopecia: n = 50 and psoriasis: n = 50); their significant others (alopecia SOs: n = 47 and psoriasis SOs: n = 50); and controls (n = 50). The aim was to examine attentional and behavioral biases toward disease-related and social threat-related stigmatization stimuli.
RESULTS: An attentional bias to disease-related stimuli was found in participants with alopecia and their SOs, compared with controls (p < .001). This effect was not found for participants with psoriasis and their SOs. Increased behavioral avoidance of disgusted faces was found in participants with psoriasis and their SOs, compared with controls (p = .047). This effect was not found in participants with alopecia and their SOs.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide support for the idea that individuals with skin conditions and their SOs are characterized by a stigmatization-related stimulus bias regarding implicit cognitive and behavioral reactions, in comparison to healthy individuals. Furthermore, preliminary results suggest that these processes may differ across skin conditions, with people with psoriasis being more affected by social reactions (i.e., disgusted faces) and people with alopecia by disease-related cues possibly related to internalized self-stigma. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27505208     DOI: 10.1037/hea0000404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  5 in total

1.  Optimizing audiovisual itch induction: the role of attention and expectancy.

Authors:  A I M van Laarhoven; H Holle
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Attentional processing of itch.

Authors:  A I M van Laarhoven; S van Damme; A P M Lavrijsen; D M van Ryckeghem; G Crombez; A W M Evers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-24

3.  Stigmatisation and body image impairment in dermatological patients: protocol for an observational multicentre study in 16 European countries.

Authors:  Florence J Dalgard; Anthony Bewley; Andrea W Evers; Uwe Gieler; Lars Lien; Francesca Sampogna; Sonja Ständer; Lucia Tomas-Aragones; Ninke Vulink; Jörg Kupfer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  What is new in the psychology of chronic itch?

Authors:  Andrea W M Evers; Kaya J Peerdeman; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.960

5.  No preconscious attentional bias towards itch in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Jennifer M Becker; Henning Holle; Dimitri M L van Ryckeghem; Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Andrea W M Evers; Ralph C A Rippe; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.