Literature DB >> 27504694

The role of encoding strategy in younger and older adult associative recognition: A think-aloud analysis.

Mark C Fox1, Zachary Baldock1, Sara P Freeman1, Jane M Berry1.   

Abstract

Older adults have especially poor recognition memory for word pairs, and research suggests this associative deficit manifests primarily in older adults' higher rates of false alarms. This could result from older adults either failing to generate meaningful (deep) mediators at study, or failing to benefit from having generated deep mediators at test. Younger and older adults performed a recognition memory task for words and word pairs. A think-aloud analysis of their spontaneous encoding strategies (repetition, shallow mediators, deep mediators) revealed that generation of deep mediators did not differ between younger and older adults, and was associated with high hit rates for items and associates in both age groups. However, generation of deep mediators was inversely related to false alarm rates in younger adults but not older adults. A trial-level analysis of encoding strategies and recognition responses revealed that younger adults benefited from having generated deep mediators when presented with corresponding recombined pairs at test as shown in their lower false alarm rates. In contrast, older adults who generated deep mediators during study (e.g., to blanket-figure) did not benefit from having done so when they encountered the corresponding recombined pairs at test (blanket-summer and district-figure). Their false alarm rates to pairs at test were unrelated to generation of deep mediators at study. These results suggest that many older adults have difficulty retrieving their mediators when presented with recombined pairs at test, or their mediators are not distinct enough to distinguish intact pairs from recombined pairs at test, or some combination of both. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27504694     DOI: 10.1037/pag0000111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  3 in total

Review 1.  How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.

Authors:  Megan L Jordano; Dayna R Touron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory.

Authors:  Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Matthew G Wisniewski; Helen L Williams; Jane M Berry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence for Age-Equivalent and Task-Dissociative Metacognition in the Memory Domain.

Authors:  Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Edie C Sanders; Jane M Berry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.