PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of thoracolumbar fractures and associated injuries in blunt trauma patients. METHODS: A systematic review and metaanalysis was performed based on a MEDLINE database search using MeSH terms for studies matching our inclusion criteria. The search yielded 21 full-length articles, each sub-grouped according to content. Data extraction and multiple analyses were performed on descriptive data. RESULTS: The rate of thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma patients was 6.90% (±3.77, 95% CI). The rate of spinal cord injury was 26.56% (±10.70), and non-contiguous cervical spine fracture occurred in 10.49% (±4.17). Associated injury was as follows: abdominal trauma 7.63% (±9.74), thoracic trauma 22.64% (±13.94), pelvic trauma 9.39% (±6.45), extremity trauma 18.26% (±5.95), and head trauma 12.96% (±2.01). Studies that included cervical spine fracture with thoracolumbar fracture had the following rates of associated trauma: 3.78% (±5.94) abdominal trauma, 21.65% (±16.79) thoracic trauma, 3.62% (±1.07) pelvic trauma, 18.36% (±4.94) extremity trauma, and 15.45% (±11.70) head trauma. A subgroup of flexion distraction injuries showed an associated intra-abdominal injury rate of 38.70% (±13.30). The most common vertebra injured was L1 at a rate of 34.40% (±15.90). T7 was the most common non-junctional vertebra injured at 3.90% (±1.09). Burst/AO type A3 fractures were the most common morphology 39.50% (±16.30) followed by 33.60% (±15.10) compression/AO type A1, 14.20% (±8.08) fracture dislocation/AO type C, and 6.96% (±3.50) flexion distraction/AO type B. The most common etiology for a thoracolumbar fracture was motor vehicle collision 36.70% (±5.35), followed by high-energy fall 31.70% (±6.70). CONCLUSIONS: Here we report the incidence of thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma and the spectrum of associated injuries. To our knowledge, this paper provides the first epidemiological road map for blunt trauma thoracolumbar injuries.
PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of thoracolumbar fractures and associated injuries in blunt traumapatients. METHODS: A systematic review and metaanalysis was performed based on a MEDLINE database search using MeSH terms for studies matching our inclusion criteria. The search yielded 21 full-length articles, each sub-grouped according to content. Data extraction and multiple analyses were performed on descriptive data. RESULTS: The rate of thoracolumbar fracture in blunt traumapatients was 6.90% (±3.77, 95% CI). The rate of spinal cord injury was 26.56% (±10.70), and non-contiguous cervical spine fracture occurred in 10.49% (±4.17). Associated injury was as follows: abdominal trauma 7.63% (±9.74), thoracic trauma 22.64% (±13.94), pelvic trauma 9.39% (±6.45), extremity trauma 18.26% (±5.95), and head trauma 12.96% (±2.01). Studies that included cervical spine fracture with thoracolumbar fracture had the following rates of associated trauma: 3.78% (±5.94) abdominal trauma, 21.65% (±16.79) thoracic trauma, 3.62% (±1.07) pelvic trauma, 18.36% (±4.94) extremity trauma, and 15.45% (±11.70) head trauma. A subgroup of flexion distraction injuries showed an associated intra-abdominal injury rate of 38.70% (±13.30). The most common vertebra injured was L1 at a rate of 34.40% (±15.90). T7 was the most common non-junctional vertebra injured at 3.90% (±1.09). Burst/AO type A3 fractures were the most common morphology 39.50% (±16.30) followed by 33.60% (±15.10) compression/AO type A1, 14.20% (±8.08) fracture dislocation/AO type C, and 6.96% (±3.50) flexion distraction/AO type B. The most common etiology for a thoracolumbar fracture was motor vehicle collision 36.70% (±5.35), followed by high-energy fall 31.70% (±6.70). CONCLUSIONS: Here we report the incidence of thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma and the spectrum of associated injuries. To our knowledge, this paper provides the first epidemiological road map for blunt trauma thoracolumbar injuries.
Authors: Andrea N Doud; Ashley A Weaver; Jennifer W Talton; Ryan T Barnard; J Wayne Meredith; Joel D Stitzel; Preston Miller; Anna N Miller Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: B Alito; V Filardi; F Famà; D Bruschetta; C Ruggeri; G Basile; L Stancanelli; C D'Amico; S Bianconi; A Tisano Journal: J Orthop Date: 2021-11-20
Authors: Blake M Hauser; John McNulty; Mark M Zaki; Saksham Gupta; David J Cote; Joshua D Bernstock; Yi Lu; John H Chi; Michael W Groff; Ayaz M Khawaja; Timothy R Smith; Hasan A Zaidi Journal: Injury Date: 2021-10-02 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Andrei Fernandes Joaquim; Sérgio Augusto Rodrigues; Felipe Soares DA Silva; Otávio Turolo DA Silva; Enrico Ghizoni; Helder Tedeschi; Gregory D Schroeder; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alpesh A Patel Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2018-08-15
Authors: Gregory Hanson; Keith W Lyons; Debra A Fournier; S Scott Lollis; Eric D Martin; Kurt K Rhynhart; Wanda J Handel; Kevin J McGuire; William A Abdu; Adam M Pearson Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2019-03-05
Authors: Jetan H Badhiwala; Gerald Lebovic; Michael Balas; Leodante da Costa; Avery B Nathens; Michael G Fehlings; Jefferson R Wilson; Christopher D Witiw Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.379