| Literature DB >> 27503808 |
Christian A Niedermeier1, Mikael Råsander1, Sneha Rhode1, Vyacheslav Kachkanov2, Bin Zou1, Neil Alford1, Michelle A Moram1.
Abstract
Epitaxial transparentEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27503808 PMCID: PMC4977526 DOI: 10.1038/srep31230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1XRD ω − 2θ patterns of NixMg1−xO thin films (x = 1, 0.83, 0.64, 0.41, 0.23, 0.12) prepared by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) showing the 100-oriented epitaxial growth on MgO(100) substrates.
Insets show a magnification of the NixMg1−xO 200 and 400 diffraction peaks on a linear scale.
Figure 2Projection of the 3D reciprocal space maps of the NixMg1−xO 200 reflection along the reciprocal lattice vector Qx of NixMg1−xO thin films (x = 1, 0.83, 0.64) grown on MgO(100) substrates recorded with 6 keV (2.067 Å) synchrotron radiation.
The intensity of the diffraction peaks is given by an iso-intensity contour map on a logarithmic scale. The dashed lines give the local intensity maxima of the NixMg1−xO 200 and MgO 200 diffraction peaks as indicated.
Figure 3(a) Cross-sectional STEM-HAADF image of the Ni0.23Mg0.77O/MgO interface acquired along the <001> zone axis and (b) STEM-EDX elemental map showing the Ni Lα,β (green) and Mg Kα (red) emission intensity for the area marked with the box in (a). (c) Cross-sectional HRTEM image of the Ni0.23Mg0.77O/MgO interface acquired along the <001> zone axis demonstrating the single-domain epitaxial growth. (d) The high magnification ABSF HRTEM image of the region indicated with the box in (c) shows the coherent crystal interface between the Ni0.23Mg0.77O thin film and the MgO substrate due to the nearly identical lattice spacing parameter d200.
Figure 4(a) Optical transmission of NixMg1−xO thin films (x = 1, 0.83, 0.64, 0.41, 0.23, 0.17, 0.12) in the UV-visible range from 200 nm to 800 nm. (b) Optical absorption showing the linear relationship between the photon energy hν and (αhν)2, where α denotes the absorption coefficient, indicating a direct optical transition.
Figure 5Experimental optical band gap of NixMg1−xO thin films (x = 1, 0.83, 0.64, 0.41, 0.23, 0.17, 0.12) obtained by absorption spectra (black filled circles).
The error in the determination of the optical band gap is contained within the size of the data points. Calculated electronic band gaps of NixMg1−xO (x = 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.375, 0.25, 0.125, 0.074, 0.037, 0) obtained from the DFT calculations of ordered (blue filled squares) and special quasi-random structures (blue filled diamonds), are shifted by +2 eV to account for the underestimation by the LDA + U method. In addition, the calculated electronic band gaps from the DFT calculation of ordered structures using the HSE approach are presented (blue filled circles). Experimental optical band gaps which have been determined by absorption and reflectance spectra in previous studies are included for comparison (grey empty symbols, after Roessler, D. M. et al.10, Zhao, Y. et al.12, Nishitani, H. et al.14, Mares, J. W. et al.17, Yang, Z.-G. et al.18, Boutwell, R. et al.19 and Guo, Y. M. et al.23).
Figure 6(a) Superposition of the electronic band structure of pure MgO (black) and Ni0.074Mg0.926O (red) obtained within the LDA + U method showing deep localized states derived from Ni 3d eg states inside the MgO band gap. The Fermi level EF of MgO is located at the valence band maximum and the Ni0.074Mg0.926O band structure is shifted to coincide with the MgO conduction band minimum. The Ni0.074Mg0.926O states at the top of the valence band are all occupied. (b) Calculated DOS of NixMg1−xO (x = 1, 0.5, 0.037 and 0) indicating that the Ni 3d eg states comprising the NiO conduction band remain as localized impurity states inside the MgO band gap for dilute NiO concentrations of 3.7 at.%. The partial DOS of Ni 3d states is shown in red.