Literature DB >> 27503729

Black or white? Physiological implications of roost colour and choice in a microbat.

Anna C Doty1, Clare Stawski2, Shannon E Currie2, Fritz Geiser2.   

Abstract

Although roost choice in bats has been studied previously, little is known about how opposing roost colours affect the expression of torpor quantitatively. We quantified roost selection and thermoregulation in a captive Australian insectivorous bat, Nyctophilus gouldi (n=12) in winter when roosting in black and white coloured boxes using temperature-telemetry. We quantified how roost choice influences torpor expression when food was provided ad libitum or restricted in bats housed together in an outdoor aviary exposed to natural fluctuations of ambient temperature. Black box temperatures averaged 5.1°C (maximum 7.5°C) warmer than white boxes at their maximum daytime temperature. Bats fed ad libitum chose black boxes on most nights (92.9%) and on 100% of nights when food-restricted. All bats used torpor on all study days. However, bats fed ad libitum and roosting in black boxes used shorter torpor and spent more time normothermic/active at night than food-restricted bats and bats roosting in white boxes. Bats roosting in black boxes also rewarmed passively more often and to a higher skin temperature than those in white boxes. Our study suggests that N. gouldi fed ad libitum select warmer roosts in order to passively rewarm to a higher skin temperature and thus save energy required for active midday rewarming as well as to maintain a normothermic body temperature for longer periods at night. This study shows that colour should be considered when deploying bat boxes; black boxes are preferable for those bats that use passive rewarming, even in winter when food availability is reduced.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27503729     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Therm Biol        ISSN: 0306-4565            Impact factor:   2.902


  4 in total

1.  Evaluating bat boxes: design and placement alter bioenergetic costs and overheating risk.

Authors:  Reed D Crawford; Luke E Dodd; Francis E Tillman; Joy M O'Keefe
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Surface reflectance drives nest box temperature profiles and thermal suitability for target wildlife.

Authors:  Stephen R Griffiths; Jessica A Rowland; Natalie J Briscoe; Pia E Lentini; Kathrine A Handasyde; Linda F Lumsden; Kylie A Robert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?

Authors:  Fritz Geiser; Clare Stawski; Anna C Doty; Christine E Cooper; Julia Nowack
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style.

Authors:  Julia P S Hoeh; George S Bakken; William A Mitchell; Joy M O'Keefe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.