Literature DB >> 27503335

Improved hybrid de novo genome assembly of domesticated apple (Malus x domestica).

Xuewei Li1, Ling Kui2, Jing Zhang3, Yinpeng Xie1, Liping Wang1, Yan Yan1, Na Wang1, Jidi Xu1, Cuiying Li1, Wen Wang2, Steve van Nocker4, Yang Dong5,6, Fengwang Ma7, Qingmei Guan8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) is a popular temperate fruit with high nutrient levels and diverse flavors. In 2012, global apple production accounted for at least one tenth of all harvested fruits. A high-quality apple genome assembly is crucial for the selection and breeding of new cultivars. Currently, a single reference genome is available for apple, assembled from 16.9 × genome coverage short reads via Sanger and 454 sequencing technologies. Although a useful resource, this assembly covers only ~89 % of the non-repetitive portion of the genome, and has a relatively short (16.7 kb) contig N50 length. These downsides make it difficult to apply this reference in transcriptive or whole-genome re-sequencing analyses.
FINDINGS: Here we present an improved hybrid de novo genomic assembly of apple (Golden Delicious), which was obtained from 76 Gb (~102 × genome coverage) Illumina HiSeq data and 21.7 Gb (~29 × genome coverage) PacBio data. The final draft genome is approximately 632.4 Mb, representing ~ 90 % of the estimated genome. The contig N50 size is 111,619 bp, representing a 7 fold improvement. Further annotation analyses predicted 53,922 protein-coding genes and 2,765 non-coding RNA genes.
CONCLUSIONS: The new apple genome assembly will serve as a valuable resource for investigating complex apple traits at the genomic level. It is not only suitable for genome editing and gene cloning, but also for RNA-seq and whole-genome re-sequencing studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apple; Illumina sequencing; Malus x domestica; PacBio sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27503335      PMCID: PMC4976516          DOI: 10.1186/s13742-016-0139-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Data description

Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple on the Illumina platform

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissues of a single ‘Golden Delicious’ apple tree with the GenElute™ Plant Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, USA). Paired-end libraries with insert sizes ranging from 350–500 bp were constructed with Next UltraTM DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB; USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. These libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina; CA, USA) using the PE-150 module [1], and yielded about 86 Gb of raw data. These data were then subjected to filtering to remove: (1) reads in which more than 5 % of bases were N or poly-A; (2) reads in which more than 30 bases were of low quality; (3) reads with adapter contamination; (4) reads shorter than 30 bp; and (5) PCR duplicates. These steps yielded a clean sequence of ~76 GB, representing about 102 × genome coverage (Additional file 1: Table S1). De novo assembly was performed with with SOAPec_v2.01 [2] using default parameters.

Single-molecule long read sequencing of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple on the PacBio platform

Single-molecule long reads from the PacBio RS II platform (Pacific Biosciences, USA) were used to assist the subsequent de novo genome assembly [3]. In brief, 15 μg of sheared DNA was used to construct five SMRT Bell libraries with an insert size of 17 kb. The libraries were then sequenced in 20 single-molecule real-time DNA sequencing cells using the P6 polymerase/C4 chemistry combination, and a data collection time of 240 min per cell. The sequencing produced about 21.7 Gb data, consisting of 2,759,937 reads with an average read length of 7,863 bp (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The polymerase read N50 length after single passing was around 16.6 kb, and the polymerase read quality was greater than 82.4 % (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Estimation of the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome size

Quality-filtered reads from the Illumina platform were subjected to 23-mer frequency distribution analysis with Jellyfish [4]. Analysis parameters were set at -k 23, and the final result was plotted as a frequency graph (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Two distinctive modes were observed from the distribution curve: the higher peak at a depth of 88 reflected the high heterozygosity of the apple genome; the lower peak provided a peak depth of 179 for the estimation of its genome size. Based on the total number of k-mers (125,428,662,216), the apple genome size was calculated to be approximately 701 Mb, using the following formula: genome size = k-mer_Number/Peak_Depth.

Hybrid de novo genome assembly

A hybrid genome assembly pipeline was used to overcome challenges posed by heterozygous apple genome (Additional file 1: Figure S3). An Illumina-based de novo genome assembly was first generated using Platanus [2], yielding a total length of 1.05 Gb, with a contig N50 length of 534 bp. Then, all PacBio RS reads were used in the hybrid assembly process via the DBG2OLC [5] pipeline with the following parameters: LD10, MinLen 200, KmerCovTh 2, MinOverlap 10, AdaptiveTh 0.001, and RemoveChimera 1. This led to a preliminary apple genome assembly of 632.4 Mb with a contig N50 size of 111,619 bp, representing ~90 % of the estimated apple genome (701 Mb). The contig N50 size represents a ~6.9 fold improvement in length from the previously reported 16.1 kb [6]. These improvements were made possible by introducing the long-read sequencing strategy (Additional file 1: Figure S4), which increased the sequencing precision of repeats.

Evaluation of the completeness of the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome assembly

CEGMA was used to evaluate the quality of the final assembly with a set of 248 ultra-conserved core eukaryotic genes [7]. Comparison analysis showed that 231 of 248 genes could be fully annotated (93.15 % completeness, see Table 1), and 243 of 248 genes met the criteria for partial annotation (97.98 % completeness). Using the same evaluation parameters, the completeness of the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome assembly v1.0 by Velasco et al. [6] was also evaluated, and a completeness of 88.71 % was obtained (220 of 248 genes could be fully annotated, see Additional file 1: Table S3). This benchmark further demonstrates the improved quality of the genome assembly reported herein.
Table 1

Statistics of the completeness of the hybrid de novo assembly genome of ‘Golden Delicious’ based on 248 core eukaryotic genes, produced by the software CEGMA [7] with default parameters

Group#Prots%Completeness#TotalAverage%Ortho
Complete23193.155452.3674.46
Group16395.451272.0266.67
Group25089.291202.4078.00
Group35895.081362.3472.41
Group46092.311622.7081.67
Partial24397.987102.9286.01
Group16496.971732.7082.81
Group25496.431592.9487.04
Group361100.001812.9788.52
Group46498.461973.0885.94

#Prots: number of 248 ultra-conserved CEGs present in genome

%Completeness: percentage of 248 ultra-conserved CEGs present

Total: total number of CEGs present including putative orthologs

Average: average number of orthologs per CEG

%Ortho: percentage of detected CEGS that have more than 1 ortholog

‘Complete’: predicted proteins in the set of 248 CEGs that, when aligned to the HMM (a hidden markov model) for the KOG (eukaryotic orthologous groups) for that protein family, give an alignment length that is at least 70 % of the protein length

‘Partial’: If a protein is not complete, but exceeds a pre-computed minimum alignment score, then we call the protein ‘partial’. The pre-computed scores are all in the file CEGMA/data/completeness_cutoff.tbl [7]

CEGs: core eukaryotic genes

Statistics of the completeness of the hybrid de novo assembly genome of ‘Golden Delicious’ based on 248 core eukaryotic genes, produced by the software CEGMA [7] with default parameters #Prots: number of 248 ultra-conserved CEGs present in genome %Completeness: percentage of 248 ultra-conserved CEGs present Total: total number of CEGs present including putative orthologs Average: average number of orthologs per CEG %Ortho: percentage of detected CEGS that have more than 1 ortholog ‘Complete’: predicted proteins in the set of 248 CEGs that, when aligned to the HMM (a hidden markov model) for the KOG (eukaryotic orthologous groups) for that protein family, give an alignment length that is at least 70 % of the protein length ‘Partial’: If a protein is not complete, but exceeds a pre-computed minimum alignment score, then we call the protein ‘partial’. The pre-computed scores are all in the file CEGMA/data/completeness_cutoff.tbl [7] CEGs: core eukaryotic genes

Repeat annotation of the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome assembly

Tandem Repeat Finder [8] was used to identify tandem repeats in the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome. RepeatMasker and RepeatProteinMasker [9] were used against Repbase [10] to identify known transposable element repeats. In addition, RepeatModeler [11] and LTR FINDER [12] were used to identify de novo evolved repeats. The combined results show that the total length of repeated sequences is about 382 Mb, accounting for ~60 % of the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome assembly (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Gene annotation

Genes for the ‘Golden Delicious’ genome were annotated using multiple methods, including transcriptome-based predictions, de novo predictions, and homology-based predictions. For de novo predictions, Augustus [13], GenScan [14], glimmerHMM [15] and SNAP [16] analysis were performed on the repeat-masked genome, with parameters trained from Arabidopsis thaliana. Partial sequences and genes with fewer than 150 bp of coding sequence length were removed. Predicted protein sequences from B. oleracea, G. max, O. sativa, P. mume, P. trichocarpa, P. persica, P. communis, V. vinifera, and Z. mays were used (Phytozome v10.3 [17]) for homology-based predictions. First, query sequences were subjected to TBLASTN analysis with an Expect (E)-value cutoff of 1 e-5. BLAST hits corresponding to reference proteins were concatenated by Solar software (The Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) development), and low-quality records were removed. The genomic sequence of each reference protein was extended upstream and downstream by 2,000 bp to represent a protein-coding region. GeneWise software [18] was used to predict gene structure contained in each protein region. For transcriptome-based predictions, RNA from three structures (leaves, flowers, and stems) was isolated and RNA-seq data (NCBI SRP067376) were used for gene annotation, processed by Tophat and Cufflinks [19]. The homology, de novo and transcriptomic gene sets were merged to form a comprehensive and non-redundant reference gene set using EVidenceModeler [20] software. Our analysis indicates that the ‘Golden Delicious’ apple genome contains 53,922 protein-coding genes (Table 2). This is slightly fewer than the previous prediction of 57,386 genes [6]. Approximately 60 % of predicted genes were represented in our transcriptome data.
Table 2

Statistics for ‘Golden Delicious’ genome protein-coding sequences annotation

Gene_numberAvg_mRNA_length (bp)Total_exon_numberAvg_exon_length (bp)Avg_cds_length (bp)Avg_exon_numberTotal_intron_length (bp)
De novo augustus376932233.785106203848166.933235902.7937815.40811350169056
genscan332068849.329489210077158.9705111005.7233036.326477260454787
glimmerHMM481291404.407447151751182.492643575.4002993.15300539899285
snap73555936.269975219634162.207063484.3475772.98598333241152
Homolog B. oleracea 70002320.82942946309139.074802920.0592866.6155719805391
G. max 85782427.16717260008137.457522961.5937286.99557012571689
O. sativa 110001887.08318261308137.971668768.9788185.57345512299148
P. mume 90002623.02966767760135.4733321019.9636677.52888914427594
P. trichocarpa 305852321.131764207830138.869210943.6386466.79516142130627
P. persica 127332431.88557393666134.420665988.8200747.35616118374553
P. communis 346422833.118267256347129.467222958.0432427.39989064956349
V. vinifera 171752460.852402118296138.772773955.8232316.88768625848876
Z. mays 223412004.558569130795138.548645811.1306575.85448326662373
RNA-seqGDflorwer1484232234.847387212811300.0272311318.5695854.39483349998557
GDflorwer2499522231.126001220057304.2868671340.4959764.40536950837822
GDflorwer3498482242.481785223056305.3070311366.1644404.47472349515976
GDleaf1450342258.958920203894296.6536341343.1162234.52755746765622
GDleaf2446692300.217086204106298.2505761362.7959434.56929947700782
GDleaf3452202292.436975206566301.2087231375.9283724.56802347304519
GDstem1469082299.298840212019308.9448071396.3965424.51989048015182
GDstem2462712308.347604209286307.7870901392.1360904.52304948368862
GDstem3466572296.511542209284310.6243481393.3323194.48558648454706
EVM539221793.161066221394167.775983688.8579064.10582059546235
Statistics for ‘Golden Delicious’ genome protein-coding sequences annotation

Non-coding RNA annotation

tRNAscan-SE (version 1.31) [21] software with default parameters for eukaryotes was used for tRNA annotation. rRNA annotation was based on homology with rRNAs from several diverse higher plant species (not shown), using BLASTN with ‘E-value = 1e-5’. miRNA and snRNA genes were predicted by INFERNAL software [22] using the Rfam database (release 11.0) [23]. The final results included 321 miRNAs, 274 tRNAs, 605 rRNAs, and 480 snRNAs (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Availability of supporting data

Sequencing reads of each sequencing library and RNA-seq data have been deposited at NCBI with the project ID SRP067376. Supporting data are also available in the GigaScience database, GigaDB [24]. All supplementary figures and tables are provided in Additional file 1.

Abbreviations

CDS, coding DNA sequence; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information
  21 in total

1.  AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Mario Stanke; Rasmus Steinkamp; Stephan Waack; Burkhard Morgenstern
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Genis Parra; Keith Bradnam; Ian Korf
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments.

Authors:  Eric P Nawrocki; Diana L Kolbe; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment.

Authors:  E Birney; R Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.).

Authors:  Riccardo Velasco; Andrey Zharkikh; Jason Affourtit; Amit Dhingra; Alessandro Cestaro; Ananth Kalyanaraman; Paolo Fontana; Satish K Bhatnagar; Michela Troggio; Dmitry Pruss; Silvio Salvi; Massimo Pindo; Paolo Baldi; Sara Castelletti; Marina Cavaiuolo; Giuseppina Coppola; Fabrizio Costa; Valentina Cova; Antonio Dal Ri; Vadim Goremykin; Matteo Komjanc; Sara Longhi; Pierluigi Magnago; Giulia Malacarne; Mickael Malnoy; Diego Micheletti; Marco Moretto; Michele Perazzolli; Azeddine Si-Ammour; Silvia Vezzulli; Elena Zini; Glenn Eldredge; Lisa M Fitzgerald; Natalia Gutin; Jerry Lanchbury; Teresita Macalma; Jeff T Mitchell; Julia Reid; Bryan Wardell; Chinnappa Kodira; Zhoutao Chen; Brian Desany; Faheem Niazi; Melinda Palmer; Tyson Koepke; Derick Jiwan; Scott Schaeffer; Vandhana Krishnan; Changjun Wu; Vu T Chu; Stephen T King; Jessica Vick; Quanzhou Tao; Amy Mraz; Aimee Stormo; Keith Stormo; Robert Bogden; Davide Ederle; Alessandra Stella; Alberto Vecchietti; Martin M Kater; Simona Masiero; Pauline Lasserre; Yves Lespinasse; Andrew C Allan; Vincent Bus; David Chagné; Ross N Crowhurst; Andrew P Gleave; Enrico Lavezzo; Jeffrey A Fawcett; Sebastian Proost; Pierre Rouzé; Lieven Sterck; Stefano Toppo; Barbara Lazzari; Roger P Hellens; Charles-Eric Durel; Alexander Gutin; Roger E Bumgarner; Susan E Gardiner; Mark Skolnick; Michael Egholm; Yves Van de Peer; Francesco Salamini; Roberto Viola
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders.

Authors:  W H Majoros; M Pertea; S L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules.

Authors:  John Eid; Adrian Fehr; Jeremy Gray; Khai Luong; John Lyle; Geoff Otto; Paul Peluso; David Rank; Primo Baybayan; Brad Bettman; Arkadiusz Bibillo; Keith Bjornson; Bidhan Chaudhuri; Frederick Christians; Ronald Cicero; Sonya Clark; Ravindra Dalal; Alex Dewinter; John Dixon; Mathieu Foquet; Alfred Gaertner; Paul Hardenbol; Cheryl Heiner; Kevin Hester; David Holden; Gregory Kearns; Xiangxu Kong; Ronald Kuse; Yves Lacroix; Steven Lin; Paul Lundquist; Congcong Ma; Patrick Marks; Mark Maxham; Devon Murphy; Insil Park; Thang Pham; Michael Phillips; Joy Roy; Robert Sebra; Gene Shen; Jon Sorenson; Austin Tomaney; Kevin Travers; Mark Trulson; John Vieceli; Jeffrey Wegener; Dawn Wu; Alicia Yang; Denis Zaccarin; Peter Zhao; Frank Zhong; Jonas Korlach; Stephen Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons.

Authors:  Zhao Xu; Hao Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Gene finding in novel genomes.

Authors:  Ian Korf
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments.

Authors:  Brian J Haas; Steven L Salzberg; Wei Zhu; Mihaela Pertea; Jonathan E Allen; Joshua Orvis; Owen White; C Robin Buell; Jennifer R Wortman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  22 in total

1.  High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development.

Authors:  Nicolas Daccord; Jean-Marc Celton; Gareth Linsmith; Claude Becker; Nathalie Choisne; Elio Schijlen; Henri van de Geest; Luca Bianco; Diego Micheletti; Riccardo Velasco; Erica Adele Di Pierro; Jérôme Gouzy; D Jasper G Rees; Philippe Guérif; Hélène Muranty; Charles-Eric Durel; François Laurens; Yves Lespinasse; Sylvain Gaillard; Sébastien Aubourg; Hadi Quesneville; Detlef Weigel; Eric van de Weg; Michela Troggio; Etienne Bucher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The Peach v2.0 release: high-resolution linkage mapping and deep resequencing improve chromosome-scale assembly and contiguity.

Authors:  Ignazio Verde; Jerry Jenkins; Luca Dondini; Sabrina Micali; Giulia Pagliarani; Elisa Vendramin; Roberta Paris; Valeria Aramini; Laura Gazza; Laura Rossini; Daniele Bassi; Michela Troggio; Shengqiang Shu; Jane Grimwood; Stefano Tartarini; Maria Teresa Dettori; Jeremy Schmutz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Genome Wide Identification and Characterization of Apple bHLH Transcription Factors and Expression Analysis in Response to Drought and Salt Stress.

Authors:  Ke Mao; Qinglong Dong; Chao Li; Changhai Liu; Fengwang Ma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Genome-Wide Analysis and Cloning of the Apple Stress-Associated Protein Gene Family Reveals MdSAP15, Which Confers Tolerance to Drought and Osmotic Stresses in Transgenic Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Qinglong Dong; Dingyue Duan; Shuang Zhao; Bingyao Xu; Jiawei Luo; Qian Wang; Dong Huang; Changhai Liu; Chao Li; Xiaoqing Gong; Ke Mao; Fengwang Ma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  A high-quality apple genome assembly reveals the association of a retrotransposon and red fruit colour.

Authors:  Liyi Zhang; Jiang Hu; Xiaolei Han; Jingjing Li; Yuan Gao; Christopher M Richards; Caixia Zhang; Yi Tian; Guiming Liu; Hera Gul; Dajiang Wang; Yu Tian; Chuanxin Yang; Minghui Meng; Gaopeng Yuan; Guodong Kang; Yonglong Wu; Kun Wang; Hengtao Zhang; Depeng Wang; Peihua Cong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Apple whole genome sequences: recent advances and new prospects.

Authors:  Cameron P Peace; Luca Bianco; Michela Troggio; Eric van de Weg; Nicholas P Howard; Amandine Cornille; Charles-Eric Durel; Sean Myles; Zoë Migicovsky; Robert J Schaffer; Evelyne Costes; Gennaro Fazio; Hisayo Yamane; Steve van Nocker; Chris Gottschalk; Fabrizio Costa; David Chagné; Xinzhong Zhang; Andrea Patocchi; Susan E Gardiner; Craig Hardner; Satish Kumar; Francois Laurens; Etienne Bucher; Dorrie Main; Sook Jung; Stijn Vanderzande
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  The first draft genome of Picrorhiza kurrooa, an endangered medicinal herb from Himalayas.

Authors:  Tanvi Sharma; Nitesh Kumar Sharma; Prakash Kumar; Ganesh Panzade; Tanuja Rana; Mohit Kumar Swarnkar; Anil Kumar Singh; Dharam Singh; Ravi Shankar; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Hybrid de novo genome assembly of the Chinese herbal fleabane Erigeron breviscapus.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Guanghui Zhang; Jing Zhang; Hui Liu; Wei Chen; Xiao Wang; Yahe Li; Yang Dong; Shengchao Yang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  The Genome Sequences of 90 Mushrooms.

Authors:  Huiying Li; Surui Wu; Xiao Ma; Wei Chen; Jing Zhang; Shengchang Duan; Yun Gao; Ling Kui; Wenli Huang; Peng Wu; Ruoyu Shi; Yifan Li; Yuanzhong Wang; Jieqing Li; Xiang Guo; Xiaoli Luo; Qiang Li; Chuan Xiong; Honggao Liu; Mingying Gui; Jun Sheng; Yang Dong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genome-wide analyses of genes encoding FK506-binding proteins reveal their involvement in abiotic stress responses in apple.

Authors:  Qinglong Dong; Ke Mao; Dingyue Duan; Shuang Zhao; Yanpeng Wang; Qian Wang; Dong Huang; Chao Li; Changhai Liu; Xiaoqing Gong; Fengwang Ma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.