Sangjun Yoo1, Dalsan You1, In Gab Jeong1, Bumsik Hong1, Jun Hyuk Hong1, Hanjong Ahn1, Choung-Soo Kim2. 1. Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea. 2. Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea. cskim@amc.seoul.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of lymph node dissection (LND) on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without suspicious lymph node (LN) metastasis on preoperative imaging studies. METHODS: From 1998 to 2012, 418 UTUC patients without suspicious LN metastasis on preoperative imaging studies were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the performance of LND. The effects of LND on oncological outcomes were assessed after adjusting other variables. The mean follow-up duration was 69 months. RESULTS: Among the 132 patients who underwent LND, LN metastasis was pathologically identified in 16 patients (12.1 %). The median number of resected LNs for patients who underwent LND was 7. On multivariate analysis, the number of resected LNs and pathologic T stage was significant predictors of LN metastasis. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 76.4 % for patients without LND and 65.4 % for patients with LND (p = 0.126). In addition, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival between the 2 groups (without LND; 71.7 % vs. with LND; 72.1 %, p = 0.756). Multivariate analysis showed that pathologic T stage, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion were risk factors for recurrence. Age at surgery, tumor size, pathologic T stage, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with overall survival. However, performance of LND was not associated with recurrence and survival. CONCLUSIONS: LND could be selectively performed in patients with clinically LN-negative UTUC based on patient/tumor characteristics and operative findings although sufficient LNs should be removed if LND is to be performed.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of lymph node dissection (LND) on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without suspicious lymph node (LN) metastasis on preoperative imaging studies. METHODS: From 1998 to 2012, 418 UTUC patients without suspicious LN metastasis on preoperative imaging studies were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the performance of LND. The effects of LND on oncological outcomes were assessed after adjusting other variables. The mean follow-up duration was 69 months. RESULTS: Among the 132 patients who underwent LND, LN metastasis was pathologically identified in 16 patients (12.1 %). The median number of resected LNs for patients who underwent LND was 7. On multivariate analysis, the number of resected LNs and pathologic T stage was significant predictors of LN metastasis. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 76.4 % for patients without LND and 65.4 % for patients with LND (p = 0.126). In addition, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival between the 2 groups (without LND; 71.7 % vs. with LND; 72.1 %, p = 0.756). Multivariate analysis showed that pathologic T stage, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion were risk factors for recurrence. Age at surgery, tumor size, pathologic T stage, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with overall survival. However, performance of LND was not associated with recurrence and survival. CONCLUSIONS: LND could be selectively performed in patients with clinically LN-negative UTUC based on patient/tumor characteristics and operative findings although sufficient LNs should be removed if LND is to be performed.
Authors: Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Guilherme Godoy; Daher C Chade; Matthew Kaag; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ross J Mason; Wassim Kassouf; David G Bell; Louis Lacombe; Anil Kapoor; Niels Jacobsen; Adrian Fairey; Jonathan Izawa; Peter Black; Simon Tanguay; Joseph Chin; Alan So; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; Edward Matsumoto; Darrel Drachenberg; Ilias Cagiannos; Yves Fradet; Ricardo A Rendon Journal: Urology Date: 2012-02-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Adil Ouzzane; Pierre Colin; Tarek P Ghoneim; Marc Zerbib; Alexandre De La Taille; François Audenet; Fabien Saint; Nicolas Hoarau; Emilie Adam; Marie Dominique Azemar; Henri Bensadoun; Luc Cormier; Olivier Cussenot; Alain Houlgatte; Gilles Karsenty; Charlotte Maurin; François Xavier Nouhaud; Véronique Phe; Thomas Polguer; Mathieu Roumiguié; Alain Ruffion; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Giovanni Lughezzani; Claudio Jeldres; Hendrik Isbarn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Daniel Pharand; Hugues Widmer; Philippe Arjane; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Urology Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Sandhya R Rao; Jose J Correa; Wade J Sexton; Julio M Pow-Sang; Shohreh I Dickinson; Hui-Yi Lin; Philippe E Spiess Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: J Alfred Witjes; Eva Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Georgios Gakis; Thierry Lebret; Maria J Ribal; Antoine G Van der Heijden; Amir Sherif Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Shane M Pearce; Joseph J Pariser; Sanjay G Patel; Gary D Steinberg; Arieh L Shalhav; Norm D Smith Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Arthur Peyrottes; Gianluigi Califano; Idir Ouzaïd; Paul Lainé-Caroff; Thibaut Long Depaquit; Jean-François Hermieu; Evanguelos Xylinas Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-03-24