Hala Rashed1, Katarina Flatman2, Mark Bamford1, Kah W Teo2, Gerald Saldanha1,2. 1. Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester, East Midlands Pathology Services (EMPATH), Leicester, UK. 2. Department of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: In 1970, Breslow described his eponymously named thickness measurement. No-one has sought to enhance the Breslow thickness (BT). The aim of this study was to demonstrate a proof of concept that the density of melanoma cells at the position where the BT is measured is a morphological prognostic biomarker, which we name the Breslow density (BD). The hypothesis was that the BD has prognostic value for overall survival (OS) and is independent of the BT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 100 cutaneous melanomas, and followed REMARK guidelines. The BD was the estimated percentage dermal area occupied by melanoma cells in a specified location. The BT and BD had a strong correlation (P = 2.1 × 10-11 ) but, despite this, they were independent prognostic factors for OS in Cox regression [BD hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, P = 0.001849; and BT HR 1.09, P = 0.000146]. This was corroborated by an independent effect on melanoma-specific survival. We assessed whether the BT and BD could be combined into a Breslow score. A prognostic index based on Cox regression coefficients was used, and this showed a marginal improvement in predicted 5-year survival as compared with the BT alone (area under the curve of 94.8% versus 96.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We show a proof of concept that the BD represents a novel morphological prognostic biomarker that is independent of the BT, and that there is potential to combine these into a Breslow score. Larger studies are needed to validate the BD, but the simplicity of this biomarker makes it a strong candidate for translation to clinical practice.
AIMS: In 1970, Breslow described his eponymously named thickness measurement. No-one has sought to enhance the Breslow thickness (BT). The aim of this study was to demonstrate a proof of concept that the density of melanoma cells at the position where the BT is measured is a morphological prognostic biomarker, which we name the Breslow density (BD). The hypothesis was that the BD has prognostic value for overall survival (OS) and is independent of the BT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 100 cutaneous melanomas, and followed REMARK guidelines. The BD was the estimated percentage dermal area occupied by melanoma cells in a specified location. The BT and BD had a strong correlation (P = 2.1 × 10-11 ) but, despite this, they were independent prognostic factors for OS in Cox regression [BD hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, P = 0.001849; and BT HR 1.09, P = 0.000146]. This was corroborated by an independent effect on melanoma-specific survival. We assessed whether the BT and BD could be combined into a Breslow score. A prognostic index based on Cox regression coefficients was used, and this showed a marginal improvement in predicted 5-year survival as compared with the BT alone (area under the curve of 94.8% versus 96.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We show a proof of concept that the BD represents a novel morphological prognostic biomarker that is independent of the BT, and that there is potential to combine these into a Breslow score. Larger studies are needed to validate the BD, but the simplicity of this biomarker makes it a strong candidate for translation to clinical practice.
Authors: Barbara Voss; Stefan Wilop; Stephan Jonas; M H M El-Komy; Joerg Schaller; Verena von Felbert; Mosaad Megahed Journal: Dermatology Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 5.366
Authors: Jessica A Cintolo; Phyllis Gimotty; Anne Blair; Dupont Guerry; David E Elder; Rachel Hammond; Rosalie Elenitsas; Xiaowei Xu; Douglas Fraker; Lynn M Schuchter; Brian J Czerniecki; Giorgos Karakousis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: S Ribero; S Osella-Abate; M Sanlorenzo; P Savoia; C Astrua; G Cavaliere; C Tomasini; R Senetta; G Macripò; M G Bernengo; P Quaglino Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: R J Friedman; D S Rigel; A W Kopf; C M Grin; E Heilman; R S Bart; H Kamino; M N Harris; D F Roses; A H Postel Journal: Dermatol Clin Date: 1991-10 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Hazzaa Aabed; Vlad Bloanca; Zorin Crainiceanu; Felix Bratosin; Cosmin Citu; Mircea Mihai Diaconu; Ovidiu Ciorica; Tiberiu Bratu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 4.614