| Literature DB >> 27502653 |
P Sudhagar1, K Asokan2, June Hyuk Jung1, Yong-Gun Lee3, Suil Park1, Yong Soo Kang4.
Abstract
A compact TiO2 layer (~1.1 μm) prepared by electrostatic spray deposition (ESD) and swift heavy ion beam (SHI) irradiation using oxygen ions onto a fluorinated tin oxide (FTO) conducting substrate showed enhancement of photovoltaic performance in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The short circuit current density (Jsc = 12.2 mA cm(-2)) of DSSCs was found to increase significantly when an ESD technique was applied for fabrication of the TiO2 blocking layer, compared to a conventional spin-coated layer (Jsc = 8.9 mA cm(-2)). When SHI irradiation of oxygen ions of fluence 1 × 10(13) ions/cm(2) was carried out on the ESD TiO2, it was found that the energy conversion efficiency improved mainly due to the increase in open circuit voltage of DSSCs. This increased energy conversion efficiency seems to be associated with improved electronic energy transfer by increasing the densification of the blocking layer and improving the adhesion between the blocking layer and the FTO substrate. The adhesion results from instantaneous local melting of the TiO2 particles. An increase in the electron transport from the blocking layer may also retard the electron recombination process due to the oxidized species present in the electrolyte. These findings from novel treatments using ESD and SHI irradiation techniques may provide a new tool to improve the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs.Entities:
Keywords: Dye-sensitized solar cells; Impedance spectroscopy; Interfaces; Ion beam irradiation; Titanium oxide
Year: 2010 PMID: 27502653 PMCID: PMC3211366 DOI: 10.1007/s11671-010-9763-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Figure 1Schematic of a electrostatic spray deposition of TiO.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction spectra. (Note that * indicated in the XRD spectra is indicated the crystalline contribution from FTO substrate.) Standard peak position (JCPDS 21-1272) of the TiO2 anatase phase is given in vertical lines.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images of pristine and O.
Figure 4Cross-sectional FE-SEM images of a bare FTO substrate, b pristine TiO. The thickness of the pristine and irradiated TiO2 was about 1.1 and 0.67 μm, respectively. (Inset: images in 100 nm scale.)
Figure 5IPCE spectra of DSSCs using different TiO.
Figure 6J-V measurements under a light illumination (100 mW cm.
Influence of TiO2 blocking layer on photovoltaic parameters of DSSCs
| Sample | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm-2) | F.F (%) | Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 0.59 | 8.9 | 71.9 | 3.8 |
| Pristine | 0.60 | 12.2 | 69.3 | 5.1 |
| O2 ion irradiated (1 × 1013 ions/cm2) | 0.63 | 12.3 | 69.9 | 5.5 |
Figure 7Nyquist spectra (measured under light illumination (100 mW cm. The inset represents the impedance spectra expanded in the high frequency ranges. The scattered points are experimental data, and the solid lines are the fitting curves.
Influence of TiO2 blocking layer on electrochemical parameters of DSSCs
| Sample | Rs (Ω) | RCT1 (Ω) | RCT2 (Ω) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 20.3 | 6.7 | 41.9 |
| Pristine | 13.6 | 8.6 | 39.8 |
| O2 ion-irradiated (1 × 1013 ions/cm2) | 13.9 | 7.9 | 57.3 |