| Literature DB >> 27502325 |
Petronella R Hove Magunda1,2, Troy Bankhead3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lp28-1 plasmid is required for persistent infection by the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Mutational studies on this plasmid have shown that the vls locus is important for antigenic variation of the VlsE lipoprotein that leads to immune evasion and persistence. However, it is still unknown whether the vls system is the only genetic locus on this plasmid necessary for long-term infection, and thus the potential role of non-vls genes on lp28-1 in virulence and persistence is yet to be fully determined. Despite extensive mutational analyses, two lp28-1 regions containing the ORFs bbf19 - bbf22 and bbf27 - bbf30 have not yet been mutated in their entirety.Entities:
Keywords: Borrelia; Immune evasion; Linear plasmid 28–1; Lyme disease; Persistence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27502325 PMCID: PMC4977671 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0806-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Schematic of the open reading frames of the B. burgdorferi lp28-1 plasmid. Genes are flanked by telomeres (striped regions). Double-headed solid arrows show regions that have been previously deleted: a [11], b and c [8]. Genetic loci bbf19-22 or bbf27-30 were chosen for mutational analysis, as there is no knowledge for their respective roles in B. burgdorferi persistence. Conserved regions (black); pseudogenes (white); short genes less than 300 bp (vertical lines); autonomous replication genes (grey)
B. burgdorferi clones used in this study
|
| Missing plasmids | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| A3 wild type | cp9 | [ |
| A3∆ | cp9 | [ |
| A3∆ | cp9 | This study |
| A3∆ | cp9 | This study |
| 5A8 ( | lp28-1 | [ |
Primers used in this study
| P330 | GTCTGTGGTAGTTACTAGTTACTTTAAATACC | Forward primer for |
| P331 | CCGAAATATTCCTATCTACTTAACAAC | Reverse primer for |
| P332 | CCGGCCGGCGAATTTTGAGTCCTCTAGTGAGTTGTG | Left primer for inverse PCR of |
| P333 | CCGGCTAGCGTTATAAGCCCTCCATTTGATAATTTTTTG | Right primer for inverse PCR of |
| P366 | CTTAATTTGTGACCGCCATTAGAGC | Forward primer for |
| P367 | GGGTTTTTTGAAACAAATCTTGC | Reverse primer for |
| P411 | GAGTTTCTGGTAAGATTAATGCTC | Forward primer for |
| P412 | CATTTAAATTCCCTTCTGTTGTCTGA | Reverse primer for |
| P413 | AGAGGTTTGTCACAAGCTTCTAGAAATACTTCAAAGGC |
|
| P482 | GAACAAGCTGAAAAATATAAAAAAGTAATG | Forward primer for PCR amplification of |
| P483 | CTGGTTACTTTTTAGATAGAGTTTTTATAGAG | Reverse primer for PCR amplification of |
| P484 | CCGGCCGGCGGTTTAGACTTGCATTTA TATCTCC | Left primer for inverse PCR |
| P485 | CCGGCTAGCCCCCTCCTTATATTTTTTTATATATAAAAG | Right primer for inverse PCR of |
| P486 | GCTTATAAGCTTTATTAACACCCATATATTC | Forward primer for |
| P487 | CCCGCGAGGTATATTTATTTATATTG | Reverse primer for |
| P709 | TTACGGATTCTAATGCGGTTT | Forward primer for |
| P710 | TTTACCAATAGCTTTAGCAGCAA | Reverse primer for |
| P711 | TGTGAAAGAGGTTGAAGCGTTGCTG. |
|
| P828 | CTGCACTACCACAAGAGATTGCA | Forward primer for PCR screen for left-end sequence of lp28-1 |
| P829 | CTCTTCTCCTCTCTTCTTCTCTCT | Reverse primer for PCR screen for left-end sequence of lp28-1 |
| P830 | CATTTCTAGTCTAGATTGCAGTTATTTCTAAAATTAACT | Forward primer for PCR amplification for lp28-1 left-end deletion target |
| P831 | GTGCCCAGGCGGCCGTCCTTATTCTTCTGGCATAGAAGT | Reverse primer for PCR amplification for lp28-1 left-end deletion target |
Fig. 2Generation and verification of lp28-1 mutant clones of B. burgdorferi. a Schematic of the construction strategy for the lp28-1 mutant clones Bb∆19-22 and Bb∆27-30 by allelic exchange is shown. Bb∆1-18 was generated by targeted telomere deletion as previously described in a published study [8]. To confirm the loss of regions bbf19-22 or bbf27-30, DNA was isolated and subjected to Southern blot analysis (b). All mutant clones provided a positive signal of the expected size (~28 kb) when probed for the kan cassette. The blot also confirmed the absence of the targeted region in the two mutant clones. WT, wild type; M, DNA size marker
Infectivity of B. burgdorferi clones in C3H mice
| Days post infection: | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | 21 | 56 | 91 | ||||
|
| Blood | Ear | Heart | Bladder | Ear | Joint | ||
| Wild type | 3/3* | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
|
| 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
|
| 3/6 | 3/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
|
| 6/6 | 5/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
|
| 3/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
*Values listed correspond to numbers of positive cultures/number of mice tested. Six or three mice were used for each B. burgdorferi clone
Fig. 3qRT-PCR analysis of ospC transcript levels in various tissue sites of infected mice. ospC expression profile of spirochetes recovered from the bladder (a), heart (b), and ear tissue (c) of mice infected with wild type, Bb∆1-18, Bb∆19-22 or Bb∆27-30 is shown. ospC expression was normalized against flaB and compared to mRNA of in vitro-grown B. burgdorferi wild-type cells grown to late log phase. Asterisks show mutant clones with ospC expression levels that were statistically different from the wild type using statistical analyses described in Methods. a) In bladder tissue, no difference in ospC expression was observed at day 21. At day 91, spirochetes from wild type-infected tissues had a statistically significant difference when compared to Bb∆1-18 infected tissues (p = 0.007). b) Spirochetes in heart tissue samples showed no significant difference when compared to wild type-infected tissues at both days 21 and 91. c) Spirochetes in the ear tissue showed a general decline in ospC expression from day 13, which was lowest at day 21 and started to rise at day 56. There was no significant difference in ospC expression noted at day 13, 21 and 91. At day 56, spirochetes from mice infected with Bb∆19-22 had a higher expression of ospC when compared to those infected by the wild type (p = 0.043). **flaB and ospC transcripts were detected at day 13 in tissues collected from mice infected with BbΔlp28-1 clone, which correlated with culture results (see Table 3). Data for this clone was not collected after day 21 as all mice successfully cleared infection after this time point