Christopher E Hill1. 1. Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom CV2 2DX. Electronic address: chill295@doctors.net.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditionally distal tibial plafond fractures were managed with open reduction internal fixation however, high complication rates have prompted the use of external fixation as an alternative. No definitive review has been conducted and the issue of superior treatment method remains contentious. This review assesses the comparative effectiveness of both with regards ankle function. METHOD: A search strategy was formulated with keywords ensuring full use of Medical Subject Headings terms for maximum sensitivity with Boolean combinations. Multiple databases were used. RESULTS: All papers had limitations, hence results and conclusions must be considered conservatively. Paper-1 demonstrated an association between ORIF and superior ankle function (P<0.05). Papers-2 and -3 demonstrated no significant difference (P>0.05) between treatment techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Neither method can yet be widely advocated as superior with the treatment method chosen remaining primarily on surgeon preference and experience. This review highlights the requirement for further, high-quality research in this area.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally distal tibial plafond fractures were managed with open reduction internal fixation however, high complication rates have prompted the use of external fixation as an alternative. No definitive review has been conducted and the issue of superior treatment method remains contentious. This review assesses the comparative effectiveness of both with regards ankle function. METHOD: A search strategy was formulated with keywords ensuring full use of Medical Subject Headings terms for maximum sensitivity with Boolean combinations. Multiple databases were used. RESULTS: All papers had limitations, hence results and conclusions must be considered conservatively. Paper-1 demonstrated an association between ORIF and superior ankle function (P<0.05). Papers-2 and -3 demonstrated no significant difference (P>0.05) between treatment techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Neither method can yet be widely advocated as superior with the treatment method chosen remaining primarily on surgeon preference and experience. This review highlights the requirement for further, high-quality research in this area.
Authors: Quirine M J van der Vliet; Yassine Ochen; Michael F McTague; Michael J Weaver; Falco Hietbrink; Roderick M Houwert; Luke P H Leenen; Marilyn Heng Journal: OTA Int Date: 2019-11-22