Karin Jordan1, Alexandre Chan2, Richard J Gralla3, Franziska Jahn4, Bernardo Rapoport5, David Warr6, Paul J Hesketh7. 1. Department for Hematology/Oncology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany. karin.jordan@uk-halle.de. 2. Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 4. Department for Hematology/Oncology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany. 5. Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa. 6. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 7. Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Employing the same framework as in previous guideline updates, antineoplastic agents were classified into four emetic risk categories. The classification of the emetogenic level of new antineoplastic agents, especially for the oral drugs, represents an increasing challenge. Accurate reporting of emetogenicity of new antineoplastic agents in the absence of preventive antiemetic treatment is rarely available. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for drugs approved after 2009 until June 2015 using EMBASE and PubMed. The search term was "drug name." The restrictions were language (English records only), date (2009 to 2015), and level of evidence ("clinical trial"). RESULTS: From January 2009 to June 2015, 42 new antineoplastic agents were identified and a systematic search was conducted to identify relevant studies to help define emetic risk levels. The reported incidence of vomiting varied across studies for many agents, but there was adequate evidence to allow 41 of the 42 new antineoplastic agents to be classified according to emetogenic risk. No highly emetogenic agents were identified. Seven moderately emetogenic agents, 26 low emetogenic, agents and eight minimal emetogenic agents were identified and classified accordingly. The MASCC/ESMO update committee also recommended reclassification of the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) as highly emetogenic. CONCLUSION: Despite several limitations, we have attempted to provide a reasonable approximation of the emetic risk associated with new antineoplastic agents through a comprehensive search of the available literature. Hopefully by the next update, more precise information on emetic risk will have been collected during new agent development process.
PURPOSE: Employing the same framework as in previous guideline updates, antineoplastic agents were classified into four emetic risk categories. The classification of the emetogenic level of new antineoplastic agents, especially for the oral drugs, represents an increasing challenge. Accurate reporting of emetogenicity of new antineoplastic agents in the absence of preventive antiemetic treatment is rarely available. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for drugs approved after 2009 until June 2015 using EMBASE and PubMed. The search term was "drug name." The restrictions were language (English records only), date (2009 to 2015), and level of evidence ("clinical trial"). RESULTS: From January 2009 to June 2015, 42 new antineoplastic agents were identified and a systematic search was conducted to identify relevant studies to help define emetic risk levels. The reported incidence of vomiting varied across studies for many agents, but there was adequate evidence to allow 41 of the 42 new antineoplastic agents to be classified according to emetogenic risk. No highly emetogenic agents were identified. Seven moderately emetogenic agents, 26 low emetogenic, agents and eight minimal emetogenic agents were identified and classified accordingly. The MASCC/ESMO update committee also recommended reclassification of the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) as highly emetogenic. CONCLUSION: Despite several limitations, we have attempted to provide a reasonable approximation of the emetic risk associated with new antineoplastic agents through a comprehensive search of the available literature. Hopefully by the next update, more precise information on emetic risk will have been collected during new agent development process.
Authors: Steven M Grunberg; David Osoba; Paul J Hesketh; Richard J Gralla; Sussanne Borjeson; Bernardo L Rapoport; Andreas du Bois; Maurizio Tonato Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: P J Hesketh; M G Kris; S M Grunberg; T Beck; J D Hainsworth; G Harker; M S Aapro; D Gandara; C M Lindley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frances A Shepherd; José Rodrigues Pereira; Tudor Ciuleanu; Eng Huat Tan; Vera Hirsh; Sumitra Thongprasert; Daniel Campos; Savitree Maoleekoonpiroj; Michael Smylie; Renato Martins; Maximiliano van Kooten; Mircea Dediu; Brian Findlay; Dongsheng Tu; Dianne Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Gary Clark; Pedro Santabárbara; Lesley Seymour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark G Kris; Paul J Hesketh; Mark R Somerfield; Petra Feyer; Rebecca Clark-Snow; James M Koeller; Gary R Morrow; Lawrence W Chinnery; Maurice J Chesney; Richard J Gralla; Steven M Grunberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria-Angeles Garcia-Del-Barrio; Salvador Martin-Algarra; Azucena Aldaz Pastor Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: L Lee Dupuis; Sabrina Boodhan; Lillian Sung; Carol Portwine; Richard Hain; Patricia McCarthy; Mark Holdsworth Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Franziska Jahn; Bernhard Wörmann; Juliane Brandt; Annette Freidank; Petra Feyer; Karin Jordan Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 8.251
Authors: Jørn Herrstedt; Fausto Roila; David Warr; Luigi Celio; Rudolph M Navari; Paul J Hesketh; Alexandre Chan; Matti S Aapro Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ronald Chow; Jørn Herrstedt; Matti Aapro; Leonard Chiu; Henry Lam; Elizabeth Prsic; Michael Lock; Carlo DeAngelis; Rudolph M Navari Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 3.359