| Literature DB >> 27501806 |
Yiling Sun1,2, Zhenhai Yang2, Pingqi Gao2, Jian He2, Xi Yang2, Jiang Sheng2, Sudong Wu2, Yong Xiang3, Jichun Ye4.
Abstract
Molybdenum oxide (MoO3) is one of most suitable antireflection (AR) layers for silicon/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (Si/ PEDOT: PSS) hybrid solar cells due to its well-matched refractive index (2.1). A simulation model was employed to predict the optical characteristics of Si/ PEDOT: PSS hybrid solar cells with the MoO3 layers as antireflection coatings (ARCs), as well as to analyze the loss in current density. By adding an optimum thickness of a 34-nm-thick ARC of MoO3 on the front side and an effective rear back surface field (BSF) of phosphorus-diffused N (+) layer at the rear side, the hybrid cells displayed higher light response in the visible and near infrared regions, boosting a short-circuit current density (J sc) up to 28.7 mA/cm(2). The average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the Si/ PEDOT: PSS hybrid solar cells was thus increased up to 11.90 %, greater than the value of 9.23 % for the reference devices.Entities:
Keywords: Antireflection layer; Hybrid solar cells; Si/PEDOT:PSS; Simulation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27501806 PMCID: PMC4977237 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1560-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1a The schematic diagram of a Si/PEDOT:PSS hybrid solar cell. b The n and k value curves of the PEDOT:PSS and thermal-evaporated MoO3 AR layers
Fig. 2a Simulated loss percentage mapping of total current density with a stack of MoO3/PEDOT:PSS/Si-substrate. The thickness for the PEDOT:PSS layer is fixed at 40 nm and the thicknesses for MoO3 layer is tunable ranging from 10 to 80 nm. b Simulated loss current density curves of total loss current density (R + PEDOT:PSS + MoO3), the reflection loss current density(R), the parasitic absorption loss caused by PEDOT:PSS and MoO3 with fixed thickness of 40 nm for the PEDOT:PSS layer, and tunable thicknesses ranging from 10 to 80 nm for the MoO3 layer. c Simulated parasitic absorption curves of MoO3 and PEDOT:PSS at wavelength range of 350–1100 nm. d Experimental and simulated reflectance spectra of PEDOT:PSS/Si-substrate, MoO3/PEDOT:PSS/Si-substrate
Fig. 3a Current density versus voltage characteristic of the hybrid solar cells from reference, BSF cell, and BSF and MoO3 cells under 100-mW/cm2 illumination (AM 1.5 G). b EQE curve of Si/PEDOT:PSS cells with reference, BSF layer, and BSF and MoO3 layers
Performance indicators of Si/PEDOT:PSS heterojunction solar cells
|
|
| FF (%) | PCE (%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 572.6 ± 1.2 | 23.2 ± 0.1 | 69.3 ± 0.5 | 9.23 ± 0.20 | 5.5 ± 0.7 |
| BSF | 598.1 ± 0.4 | 25.3 ± 0.1 | 70.2 ± 0.6 | 10.63 ± 0.18 | 4.6 ± 0.9 |
| BSF and MoO3 | 599.8 ± 0.8 | 28.7 ± 0.2 | 69.2 ± 0.8 | 11.90 ± 0.11 | 4.3 ± 1.0 |
Yiling Sun et al.
Fig. 4Dark J-V curve of Si/PEDOT:PSS devices with or without BSF layer
Diode ideality factor (n), reverse saturation current density (J ), and Schottky barrier height (Φ bi) values of Si/PEDOT:PSS heterojunction solar cells
|
|
| Φbi (eV) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 2.88 × 10−7 | 2.45 | 0.805 |
| BSF and MoO3 | 1.54 × 10−7 | 2.15 | 0.821 |
Yiling Sun et al.