Literature DB >> 27501054

Lack of genetic variation prevents adaptation at the geographic range margin in a damselfly.

Yuma Takahashi1,2, Yoshihisa Suyama3, Yu Matsuki3, Ryo Funayama4, Keiko Nakayama4, Masakado Kawata5.   

Abstract

What limits a species' distribution in the absence of physical barriers? Genetic load due to asymmetric gene flow and the absence of genetic variation due to lack of gene flow are hypothesized to constrain adaptation to novel environments in marginal populations, preventing range expansion. Here, we examined the genetic structure and geographic variation in morphological traits in two damselflies (Ischnura asiatica and I. senegalensis) along a latitudinal gradient in Japan, which is the distribution centre of I. asiatica and the northern limit of I. senegalensis. Genomewide genetic analyses found a loss of genetic diversity at the edge of distribution in I. senegalensis but consistently high diversity in I. asiatica. Gene flow was asymmetric in a south-north direction in both species. Although body size and wing loading showed decreasing latitudinal clines (smaller in north) in I. asiatica in Japan, increasing latitudinal clines (larger in north) in these phenotypic markers were observed in I. senegalensis, particularly near the northern boundary, which coincided well with the location where genetic diversity began a sharp decline. In ectothermic animals, increasing latitudinal cline in these traits was suggested to be established when they failed to adapt to thermal gradient. Therefore, our findings support the possibility that a lack of genetic variation rather than geneflow swamping is responsible for the constraint of adaptation at the margin of geographic distribution.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; damselfly; distribution range; genetic diversity; migration load; range margin

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27501054     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  8 in total

1.  Geography alone cannot explain Tetranychus truncatus (Acari: Tetranychidae) population abundance and genetic diversity in the context of the center-periphery hypothesis.

Authors:  Peng-Yu Jin; Jing-Tao Sun; Lei Chen; Xiao-Feng Xue; Xiao-Yue Hong
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Enigmatic incongruence between mtDNA and nDNA revealed by multi-locus phylogenomic analyses in freshwater snails.

Authors:  Takahiro Hirano; Takumi Saito; Yoshihiro Tsunamoto; Joichiro Koseki; Bin Ye; Van Tu Do; Osamu Miura; Yoshihisa Suyama; Satoshi Chiba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Low genome-wide divergence between two lizard populations with high adaptive phenotypic differentiation.

Authors:  Alejandro Llanos-Garrido; Javier Pérez-Tris; José A Díaz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Population transcriptomics reveals the effect of gene flow on the evolution of range limits.

Authors:  Katsunori Tamagawa; Kotone Yoshida; Shiori Ohrui; Yuma Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The shrunk genetic diversity of coral populations in North-Central Patagonia calls for management and conservation plans for marine resources.

Authors:  Anna Maria Addamo; Serena Zaccara; Vreni Häussermann; Juan Höfer; Günter Försterra; Ricardo García-Jiménez; Giuseppe Crosa; Annie Machordom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Genetic adaptation as a biological buffer against climate change: Potential and limitations.

Authors:  Luc De Meester; Robby Stoks; Kristien I Brans
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.654

7.  Is the sky the limit? On the expansion threshold of a species' range.

Authors:  Jitka Polechová
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Charting a course for genetic diversity in the UN Decade of Ocean Science.

Authors:  Alex Innes Thomson; Frederick I Archer; Melinda A Coleman; Gonzalo Gajardo; William P Goodall-Copestake; Sean Hoban; Linda Laikre; Adam D Miller; David O'Brien; Sílvia Pérez-Espona; Gernot Segelbacher; Ester A Serrão; Kjersti Sjøtun; Michele S Stanley
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.