Kristina T Phillips1. 1. School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: People who inject drugs (PWID) engage in practices that put them at risk for various infections and overdose. The primary aim of this study was to examine common barriers to engaging in two risk reduction practices - cleaning one's skin at the injection site and always using new needles to inject - among heroin injectors in Denver, CO. METHOD: In 2010, 48 PWIDs were recruited through street outreach and completed a structured interview that included questions on the frequency of specific risk reduction practices (skin cleaning and using new needles) and barriers associated with these practices. RESULTS: Though many of the reported barriers were similar across the two practices, the most common barriers associated with skin cleaning included being in withdrawal and not being prepared with materials prior to injection. Fear of being arrested and being in withdrawal were most frequently reported for using new needles. Multivariate and t-test analyses demonstrated that individuals who skin cleaned and used new needles more frequently reported less barriers to these practices. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported a number of barriers to risk reduction, including those that are within the personal control of the injector, barriers that are consequences of addiction or psychological problems, and those that are structural or a function of the risk environment. Statistical analysis found that PWIDs who were more likely to skin clean and use new needles reported less barriers. Addressing barriers when intervening with PWID appears important to increase the success of risk reduction interventions.
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: People who inject drugs (PWID) engage in practices that put them at risk for various infections and overdose. The primary aim of this study was to examine common barriers to engaging in two risk reduction practices - cleaning one's skin at the injection site and always using new needles to inject - among heroin injectors in Denver, CO. METHOD: In 2010, 48 PWIDs were recruited through street outreach and completed a structured interview that included questions on the frequency of specific risk reduction practices (skin cleaning and using new needles) and barriers associated with these practices. RESULTS: Though many of the reported barriers were similar across the two practices, the most common barriers associated with skin cleaning included being in withdrawal and not being prepared with materials prior to injection. Fear of being arrested and being in withdrawal were most frequently reported for using new needles. Multivariate and t-test analyses demonstrated that individuals who skin cleaned and used new needles more frequently reported less barriers to these practices. CONCLUSIONS:Participants reported a number of barriers to risk reduction, including those that are within the personal control of the injector, barriers that are consequences of addiction or psychological problems, and those that are structural or a function of the risk environment. Statistical analysis found that PWIDs who were more likely to skin clean and use new needles reported less barriers. Addressing barriers when intervening with PWID appears important to increase the success of risk reduction interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
barriers; harm reduction; heroin; injection drug use; risk reduction
Authors: D M Patrick; S A Strathdee; C P Archibald; M Ofner; K J Craib; P G Cornelisse; M T Schechter; M L Rekart; M V O'Shaughnessy Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Don C Des Jarlais; Holly Hagan; Kamyar Arasteh; Courtney McKnight; Salaam Semaan; David C Perlman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Milagros Sandoval; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Peter Meylakhs; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Theodore M Hammett; Son Phan; Julia Gaggin; Patricia Case; Nicholas Zaller; Alexandra Lutnick; Alex H Kral; Ekaterina V Fedorova; Robert Heimer; Will Small; Robin Pollini; Leo Beletsky; Carl Latkin; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ricky N Bluthenthal; Kelsey Simpson; Rachel Carmen Ceasar; Johnathan Zhao; Lynn Wenger; Alex H Kral Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Shannon R Kenney; Kristina T Phillips; Debra S Herman; Julia Keosaian; Bradley J Anderson; Michael D Stein Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2020 May/Jun Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Raagini Jawa; Michael D Stein; Bradley Anderson; Jane M Liebschutz; Catherine Stewart; Kristina T Phillips; Joshua A Barocas Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2021-03-18
Authors: Aliza Monroe-Wise; Loice Mbogo; Brandon Guthrie; David Bukusi; Betsy Sambai; Bhavna Chohan; John Scott; Peter Cherutich; Helgar Musyoki; Rose Bosire; Matthew Dunbar; Paul Macharia; Sarah Masyuko; Eduan Wilkinson; Tulio De Oliveira; Natasha Ludwig-Barron; Bill Sinkele; Joshua Herbeck; Carey Farquhar Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Stephen M Davis; Shay Daily; Alfgeir L Kristjansson; George A Kelley; Keith Zullig; Adam Baus; Danielle Davidov; Melanie Fisher Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2017-05-17