| Literature DB >> 27499674 |
Hyun-Su Choi1, Hyung-Gyu Choi1, Yeong-Seok Choi1, Jong-Hee Kim2, Ju-Ho Lee2, Eun-Hee Jung3, Sang-Hwa Lee4, Yang-Il Choi1, Jung-Seok Choi5.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of chicory fiber for the replacement of fat and smoking on quality characteristics of restructured sausages. Treatments were as follows; CONTROL: Pork backfat 20%, T1: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10%, T2: CONTROL + Smoking, T3: T1 + Smoking. The addition of chicory fiber significantly reduced the moisture, fat, hardness and pH values, whereas the smoking treatment increased the fat, redness and pH values of restructured sausages (p<0.01). Additionally, interaction of them significantly affected the ash, chewiness and hardness values of restructured sausages. As a result, although the addition of chicory fiber decreased the quality characteristics of sausage, smoking treatment improved the reduced quality. Therefore, the chicory fiber and smoking treatment is helpful to develop restructured sausage products with reduced fat and compensated quality.Entities:
Keywords: chicory fiber; quality characteristics; restructured sausage; smoking
Year: 2016 PMID: 27499674 PMCID: PMC4973935 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.1.131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Proximate analysis (%) of smoked (or not) restructured sausages following addition of chicory dietary fiber
| Treatments1) | Moisture | Fat | Ash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 65.44 | 11.72 | 2.53 | |
| T1 | 62.31 | 8.56 | 2.33 | |
| T2 | 64.54 | 14.25 | 1.76 | |
| T3 | 61.91 | 9.55 | 1.86 | |
| SEM | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.09 | |
| F1) | <0.01 | <0.01 | - | |
| S2) | - | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| F×S3) | - | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
1)Control: Pork backfat 20%, T1: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10%, T2: Pork backfat 20% + Smoking, T3: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10% + Smoking
2)F: Fat substitute with chicory
3)S: Smoking
4)F×S: Interaction between fat substitute and smoking
Texture profile analysis of smoked (or not) restructured sausages following addition of chicory dietary fiber
| Treatments1) | Springiness (%) | Cohesiveness (%) | Chewiness (kg) | Hardness (kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 78.88 | 56.33 | 0.77 | 0.56 | |
| T1 | 78.78 | 56.50 | 0.51 | 0.40 | |
| T2 | 77.99 | 58.92 | 0.61 | 0.51 | |
| T3 | 81.43 | 59.89 | 0.80 | 0.65 | |
| SEM | 0.86 | 1.47 | 0.03 | 2.63 | |
| F2) | - | - | - | <0.01 | |
| S3) | - | - | - | - | |
| F×S4) | - | - | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
1)Control: Pork backfat 20%, T1: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10%, T2: Pork backfat 20% + Smoking, T3: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10% + Smoking
2)F: Fat substitute with chicory
3)S: Smoking
4)F×S: Interaction between fat substitute and smoking
Color and pH of smoked (or not) restructured sausages following addition of chicory dietary fiber
| Treatments1) | Hunter color2) | pH | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | a | b | |||
| Control | 62.10 | 12.30 | 11.01 | 6.03 | |
| T1 | 60.22 | 12.41 | 10.48 | 5.92 | |
| T2 | 63.55 | 13.99 | 11.61 | 6.09 | |
| T3 | 62.94 | 12.96 | 10.46 | 5.98 | |
| SEM | 0.49 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.01 | |
| F3) | - | - | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| S4) | - | <0.01 | - | <0.01 | |
| F×S5) | - | - | - | - | |
1)Control: Pork backfat 20%, T1: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10%, T2: Pork backfat 20% + Smoking, T3: Pork backfat 10% + Chicory fiber 10% + Smoking
2)L: lightness, a: redness, b: yellowness
3)F: Fat substitute with chicory
4)S: Smoking
5)F×S: Interaction between fat substitute and smoking