| Literature DB >> 27499581 |
Yuting Wang1, Yuan Gao2, Quanbo Liu1, Xue Zhan1, Zhongyue Li1, Huajian Hu1, Tingyu Li2, Jie Chen2.
Abstract
To investigate the effect of vitamin A and Zn supplementation on vitamin A status, haemoglobin level and defecation of children with persistent diarrhea, a total of 160 paediatric patients were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups: daily supplementation of 1,500 IU VA for 14 days; daily Zn supplementation for 14 days; daily supplementation with both VA and Zn for 14 days; no supplementation. One hundred twenty-seven children with persistent diarrhea finished intervention (33 were lost to follow-up). Among the 127 children, 41 (32.28%) had anaemia, 104 (81.89%) had a VA deficiency and 38 (29.92%) had an iron insufficiency. Supplementation with VA or VA + Zn enhanced the serum VA levels and ameliorated anaemia. Supplementation with Zn and VA + Zn for 5 days significantly improved defecation, where the VA + Zn treatment resulted in superior outcomes. After 14 days of intervention, the total effectiveness rates were 93.94%, 96.77% and 96.67% in the three groups, significantly greater than that of the non-supplementation group (72.73%). These results indicate that single VA or concurrent VA + Zn supplementation can improve vitamin A status, haemoglobin level and defecation. However, concurrent VA + Zn supplementation is the optimal option and can shorten the duration of persistent diarrhea and markedly improve nutritional status. (www.clinicaltrials.gov registration number: ChiCTR-IOR-14005498).Entities:
Keywords: Zn; anaemia; intervention; treatment efficacy of persistent diarrhea; vitamin A
Year: 2016 PMID: 27499581 PMCID: PMC4933690 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.15-68
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Flow chart.
Analysis of 127 children with persistent diarrhea
| Number ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 81 |
| Female | 46 | |
| Age | ≤3 months | 31 |
| 4–6 months | 37 | |
| 7–12 months | 45 | |
| 1–3 years | 8 | |
| ≥3 years | 6 | |
| Weight-for-age | normal | 88 |
| low body weight | 39 | |
| Hemoglobin (Hb) | normal | 86 |
| anemia | 41 | |
| Albumin level | normal | 51 |
| Hypoproteinemia | 76 | |
| Vitamin A level | normal | 23 |
| VA deficiency | 104 | |
| Zinc level | normal | 106 |
| Zinc insufficient | 21 | |
| Serum iron level | normal | 89 |
| iron insufficient | 38 | |
Analysis of intestinal flora smear between the VAN and VAD groups
| Group | Normal | Dysbacteriosis | Serious dysbacteriosis a = II + III (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degrees I | Degrees II | Degrees III | |||
| VAN | 3 (13.0) | 7.0 (30.40) | 11.0 (47.80) | 2.0 (8.70) | 13.0 (56.50) |
| VAD | 4 (3.85) | 16.0 (15.38) | 77.0 (74.03) | 7.0 (6.73) | 84.0 (80.77) |
*χ2 = 6.14, vs the VAD group, p<0.05.
The gender composition and average age among the four groups†
| Group | Number | Gender | Age (months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||
| A | 33 | 21 | 12 | 8.72 ± 7.29 |
| B | 31 | 20 | 11 | 8.50 ± 7.38 |
| C | 30 | 18 | 12 | 8.21 ± 7.01 |
| D | 33 | 22 | 11 | 8.86 ± 8.34 |
| Total | 127 | 81 | 46 | 8.43 ± 7.45 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. †There are no significant differences among the groups, p>0.05.
Comparison of nutritional status between groups†
| Group | Number | Wt (kg) | Hb (g/L) | Alb (g/L) | Zn (mM) | Fe (µM) | VA (mM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 33 | 8.50 ± 1.94 | 109.12 ± 11.23 | 33.0 ± 3.89 | 12.64 ± 3.30 | 13.13 ± 5.05 | 0.73 ± 0.30 |
| B | 31 | 7.22 ± 1.95 | 112.52 ± 11.85 | 34.14 ± 4.0 | 13.94 ± 3.91 | 13.13 ± 7.97 | 0.79 ± 0.33 |
| C | 30 | 7.26 ± 1.76 | 111.86 ± 15.17 | 33.09 ± 5.29 | 12.83 ± 2.95 | 13.12 ± 6.25 | 0.73 ± 0.42 |
| D | 33 | 7.06 ± 2.53 | 101.32 ± 19.42 | 29.58 ± 6.92 | 12.59 ± 3.86 | 14.59 ± 6.10 | 0.74 ± 0.26 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. †There are no significant differences among the groups, p>0.05.
The serum VA levels among the four groups after 14 days intervention
| Group | Number | Mean of VA level (mM) | Mean of VA level after 14 days intervention (mM) | Mean of average increase (mM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 33 | 0.73 ± 0.30 | 0.98 ± 0.40 | 0.24 ± 0.10 |
| B | 31 | 0.79 ± 0.33 | 0.85 ± 0.38 | 0.06 ± 0.05 |
| C | 30 | 0.73 ± 0.42 | 1.01 ± 0.51 | 0.28 ± 0.09† |
| D | 33 | 0.74 ± 0.26 | 0.79 ± 0.30 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. *Compared with group B, p<0.05. †Compared with group D, p<0.01.
The Hb levels among the four groups after 14 days intervention
| Group | Number | Mean of Hb level (g/L) | Mean of Hb level after 14 days intervention (g/L) | Mean of average increase (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 33 | 109.12 ± 11.23 | 114.22 ± 13.47 | 5.11 ± 2.23 |
| B | 31 | 112.52 ± 11.85 | 114.52 ± 13.55 | 2.43 ± 1.70 |
| C | 30 | 111.86 ± 15.17 | 119.28 ± 19.85 | 7.43 ± 4.67† |
| D | 33 | 101.32 ± 19.42 | 103.65 ± 20.52 | 2.23 ± 1.09 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. *Compared with group B, p<0.05. †Compared with group D, p<0.01.
The changes of the serum iron before and after intervention
| Group | Number | Mean of Fe level (µM) | Mean of Fe level after 14 days intervention (µM) | Mean of average increase (µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 33 | 13.13 ± 5.05 | 12.02 ± 4.33 | –1.11 ± 1.14 |
| B | 31 | 13.13 ± 7.97 | 14.70 ± 7.86 | 1.57 ± 0.69§,|| |
| C | 30 | 13.12 ± 6.25 | 12.82 ± 5.85 | –0.30 ± 0.88¶ |
| D | 33 | 14.59 ± 6.10 | 15.78 ± 6.10 | 1.19 ± 0.53 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. *Compared with B group, p<0.001. †Compared with C group, p<0.05. ‡Compared with D group, p<0.001. §Compared with C group, p<0.001. ||Compared with D group, p>0.05. ¶Compared with D group, p<0.001.
Comparison of the curative effect among the four groups after 5 days intervention
| Group | Number | The curative effect | The total effective | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellence | Effective | Invalid | |||
| A | 33 | 6.0 (18.18) | 15.0 (45.45) | 12.0 (36.36) | 21.0 (63.64)†,‡ |
| B | 31 | 8.0 (25.81) | 20.0 (64.52) | 3.0 (9.68) | 28.0 (90.32)§ |
| C | 30 | 7.0 (23.33) | 21.0 (70.0) | 2.0 (6.67) | 28.0 (93.33)§ |
| D | 33 | 4.0 (12.12) | 14.0 (42.42) | 15.0 (45.45) | 18.0 (54.55) |
*The total effective = Excellence + Effective. †Compared with B group, p<0.05. ‡Compared with C group, p<0.01. §Compared with D group, p<0.01.
Comparison of the curative effect among the four groups after 14 days intervention
| Group | Number | The curative effect | The total effective | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellence | Effective | Invalid | |||
| A | 33 | 24.0 (72.73)† | 7.0 (21.21) | 2.0 (0.06) | 31.0 (93.94)§ |
| B | 31 | 26.0 (83.70)‡ | 4.0 (12.90) | 1.0 (0.03) | 30.0 (96.77)§ |
| C | 30 | 25.0 (8.33)‡ | 4.0 (0.13) | 1.0 (0.03) | 29.0 (96.67)§ |
| D | 33 | 14.0 (0.48) | 10.0 (0.33) | 9.0 (0.18) | 24.0 (72.73) |
*The total effective = Excellence + Effective. †Compared with D group, p<0.05. ‡Compared with D group, p<0.01. §Compared with D group, p<0.05.