Literature DB >> 27499555

Resource Scarcity and Prescriptive Attitudes Generate Subtle, Intergenerational Older-Worker Exclusion.

Michael S North1, Susan T Fiske2.   

Abstract

Prior work describes specific, prescriptive resource tensions between generations, comprising active Succession, passive Consumption, and symbolic Identity (SCI; North & Fiske, 2013a, 2013b). The current paper focuses on how these domains potentially drive intergenerational exclusion in work-related networking and training spheres. Studies 1a-1c-each focusing on a different SCI domain-manipulated perceived resource availability between generations, then introduced a professional networking opportunity. Across studies, scarcity reduced the likelihood of young participants' networking engagement with older workers who violated SCI resource expectations. Study 2 impelled participants to allocate scarce training resources among three similarly qualified but different-aged employees (younger, middle-aged, and older). Older workers received the lowest such investment, particularly among younger participants-an effect driven by Succession beliefs, per mediation analyses. Overall, the findings emphasize resource tensions in driving older workers' subtle exclusion by younger generations; minimizing such tensions will be critical for aging, increasingly intergenerational workplaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageism; age prescriptions; aging; intergenerational resources; subtle workplace exclusion

Year:  2016        PMID: 27499555      PMCID: PMC4972495          DOI: 10.1111/josi.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Issues        ISSN: 0022-4537


  13 in total

1.  Employment discrimination against older workers: an experimental study of hiring practices.

Authors:  M Bendick; C W Jackson; J H Romero
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  1996

2.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

Review 3.  Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Levy Paluck; Donald P Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

5.  TRAINING OLDER WORKERS FOR TECHNOLOGY-BASED EMPLOYMENT.

Authors:  Chin Chin Lee; Sara J Czaja; Joseph Sharit
Journal:  Educ Gerontol       Date:  2009-01-01

6.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods.

Authors:  David P Mackinnon; Chondra M Lockwood; Jason Williams
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots.

Authors:  Michael S North; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age.

Authors:  Igor Grossmann; Jinkyung Na; Michael E W Varnum; Denise C Park; Shinobu Kitayama; Richard E Nisbett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale: succession, identity, and consumption (SIC).

Authors:  Michael S North; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-04-01

10.  Act your (old) age: prescriptive, ageist biases over succession, consumption, and identity.

Authors:  Michael S North; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-03-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  Old and Unemployable? How Age-Based Stereotypes Affect Willingness to Hire Job Candidates.

Authors:  Dominic Abrams; Hannah J Swift; Lisbeth Drury
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2016-03-09

2.  Age Bias in Selection Decisions: The Role of Facial Appearance and Fitness Impressions.

Authors:  Michèle C Kaufmann; Franciska Krings; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Sabine Sczesny
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 3.  Determinants of Ageism against Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sibila Marques; João Mariano; Joana Mendonça; Wouter De Tavernier; Moritz Hess; Laura Naegele; Filomena Peixeiro; Daniel Martins
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Chinese Versus United States Workplace Ageism as GATE-ism: Generation, Age, Tenure, Experience.

Authors:  Michael S North
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  Influence of Contact Experience and Germ Aversion on Negative Attitudes Toward Older Adults: Role of Youth Identity.

Authors:  Yuho Shimizu; Takaaki Hashimoto; Kaori Karasawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-16

6.  Ageism toward older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Intergenerational conflict and support.

Authors:  Alina Sutter; Mamta Vaswani; Patrick Denice; Kate H Choi; Joanie Bouchard; Victoria M Esses
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2022-09-24

7.  "You are stealing our present": Younger people's ageism towards older people predicts attitude towards age-based COVID-19 restriction measures.

Authors:  Federica Spaccatini; Ilaria Giovannelli; Maria Giuseppina Pacilli
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2022-08-09

8.  Ageist Attitudes Are Associated with Will-to-Live and Moderated by Age, Medical Conditions and Attitudes toward Aging.

Authors:  Racheli-Lital Gvili; Ehud Bodner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Is There a Downside of Job Accommodations? An Employee Perspective on Individual Change Processes.

Authors:  Julia M Kensbock; Stephan A Boehm; Kirill Bourovoi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-20

10.  Global reach of ageism on older persons' health: A systematic review.

Authors:  E-Shien Chang; Sneha Kannoth; Samantha Levy; Shi-Yi Wang; John E Lee; Becca R Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.