A Lädermann1, E Y Lo2, A J Schwitzguébel3, E Yates2. 1. La Tour Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 3, rue J.-D. Maillard, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, 1, rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland; Geneva University Hospitals, Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 4, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. Electronic address: Alexandre.laedermann@gmail.com. 2. St Francis Memorial Hospital, Center for Sports Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. La Tour Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 3, rue J.-D. Maillard, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland.
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that performing a RSA using an anterior approach without cutting the subscapularis tendon and the deltoid muscle could provide patients with superior short-term clinical outcomes and immediate active range of motion (ROM) without immobilization. METHODS: Between August 2013 and June 2015, all patients who had a primary RSA were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in this prospective study. RESULTS: No immediate intra- or postoperative complications were noted. A statistically significant improvement of VAS (from 6.7 to 1; P<.001), SANE (from 34 to 80; P<.001), and elevation (from 103° to 128°; P=.02) was observed. In some cases, patients who had pseudoparalysis preoperative were able to achieve full anterior elevation few days after the operation. DISCUSSION: Using a subscapularis and deltoid preserving anterior approach is an option for patients requiring RSA. Leaving this tendon intact and preserving the deltoid minimize the need for immediate postoperative immobilization and allow for faster recovery of shoulder ROM, without risking the concern of humeral anterior dislocation. Overall duration of hospital stay as well as length of postoperative physical therapy may be minimized, with substantial long-term economic gain. Longer follow-up and comparison with standard approaches is necessary in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OF THE STUDY: Level IV, case series with no comparative group.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that performing a RSA using an anterior approach without cutting the subscapularis tendon and the deltoid muscle could provide patients with superior short-term clinical outcomes and immediate active range of motion (ROM) without immobilization. METHODS: Between August 2013 and June 2015, all patients who had a primary RSA were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in this prospective study. RESULTS: No immediate intra- or postoperative complications were noted. A statistically significant improvement of VAS (from 6.7 to 1; P<.001), SANE (from 34 to 80; P<.001), and elevation (from 103° to 128°; P=.02) was observed. In some cases, patients who had pseudoparalysis preoperative were able to achieve full anterior elevation few days after the operation. DISCUSSION: Using a subscapularis and deltoid preserving anterior approach is an option for patients requiring RSA. Leaving this tendon intact and preserving the deltoid minimize the need for immediate postoperative immobilization and allow for faster recovery of shoulder ROM, without risking the concern of humeral anterior dislocation. Overall duration of hospital stay as well as length of postoperative physical therapy may be minimized, with substantial long-term economic gain. Longer follow-up and comparison with standard approaches is necessary in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OF THE STUDY: Level IV, case series with no comparative group.
Authors: Alexandre Almeida; Daniel C Agostini; Cristiano Raymondi; Pedro Guarise; Nayvaldo Couto de Almeida; Guilherme A Stangherlini Journal: J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast Date: 2019-07-09
Authors: Vitor C Pereira; José Barreto; Sónia Tomé; João Cunha; João Amaro; Jorge Moreira; António Miranda; Catarina A Branco Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-03-19
Authors: Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick Joel Denard; Jérome Tirefort; Philippe Collin; Alexandra Nowak; Adrien Jean-Pierre Schwitzguebel Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Alexandre Lädermann; Philippe Collin; George S Athwal; Markus Scheibel; Matthias A Zumstein; Geoffroy Nourissat Journal: EFORT Open Rev Date: 2018-05-21