Literature DB >> 27498815

Static and dynamic single leg postural control performance during dual-task paradigms.

Maria K Talarico1,2, Robert C Lynall1,3, Timothy C Mauntel2,3, Paul S Weinhold3,4, Darin A Padua2,3, Jason P Mihalik1,3.   

Abstract

Combining dynamic postural control assessments and cognitive tasks may give clinicians a more accurate indication of postural control under sport-like conditions compared to single-task assessments. We examined postural control, cognitive and squatting performance of healthy individuals during static and dynamic postural control assessments in single- and dual-task paradigms. Thirty participants (female = 22, male = 8; age = 20.8 ± 1.6 years, height = 157.9 ± 13.0 cm, mass = 67.8 ± 20.6 kg) completed single-leg stance and single-leg squat assessments on a force plate individually (single-task) and concurrently (dual-task) with two cognitive assessments, a modified Stroop test and the Brooks Spatial Memory Test. Outcomes included centre of pressure speed, 95% confidence ellipse, squat depth and speed and cognitive test measures (percentage of correct answers and reaction time). Postural control performance varied between postural control assessments and testing paradigms. Participants did not squat as deep and squatted slower (P < 0.001) during dual-task paradigms (≤12.69 ± 3.4 cm squat depth, ≤16.20 ± 4.6 cm · s-1 squat speed) compared to single-task paradigms (14.57 ± 3.6 cm squat depth, 19.65 ± 5.5 cm · s-1 squat speed). The percentage of correct answers did not change across testing conditions, but Stroop reaction time (725.81 ± 59.2 ms; F2,58 = 7.725, P = 0.001) was slowest during single-leg squats compared to baseline (691.64 ± 80.1 ms; P = 0.038) and single-task paradigms (681.33 ± 51.5 ms; P < 0.001). Dynamic dual-task assessments may be more challenging to the postural control system and may better represent postural control performance during dynamic activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reaction time; Stroop test; functional assessments

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27498815     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1211307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injury Risk After Concussion Recovery in High School Athletes.

Authors:  Robert C Lynall; Timothy C Mauntel; Ryan T Pohlig; Zachary Y Kerr; Thomas P Dompier; Eric E Hall; Thomas A Buckley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The effect of mental tracking task on spatiotemporal gait parameters in healthy younger and middle- and older aged participants during dual tasking.

Authors:  Leandro Viçosa Bonetti; Syed Ahmed Hassan; Karina Tamy Kasawara; W Darlene Reid
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Verbal interference paradigms: A systematic review investigating the role of language in cognition.

Authors:  Johanne S K Nedergaard; Mikkel Wallentin; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-08-22

4.  Single-Legged Hop and Single-Legged Squat Balance Performance in Recreational Athletes With a History of Concussion.

Authors:  Robert C Lynall; Kody R Campbell; Timothy C Mauntel; J Troy Blackburn; Jason P Mihalik
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Lower Kinetic Chain, Meet the Thinking Brain: A Scoping Review of Cognitive Function and Lower Extremity Injury Risk.

Authors:  Michaela A Reyes; Mark O Probasco; Trina N Worby; Dylan E Loertscher; Lyndsey K Soderbeck; Wendy E Huddleston
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Assessment of patient functional performance in different knee arthroplasty designs during unconstrained squat.

Authors:  Federica Verdini; Claudio Zara; Tommaso Leo; Alessandro Mengarelli; Stefano Cardarelli; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-01-10

7.  Traditional Neuropsychological Testing Does Not Predict Motor-Cognitive Test Performance.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Oliver Vogel; Sandra Ungricht
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.