Literature DB >> 27498394

Ethical considerations in the de-adoption of ineffective or harmful aspects of healthcare.

Daniel J Niven1, Jeanna Parsons Leigh2, Henry T Stelfox3.   

Abstract

De-adoption refers to the discontinuance of a medical practice or health service found to be ineffective or harmful following a previous period of adoption. As growing healthcare budgets threaten to cripple the societies that fund them, facilitating de-adoption may be integral to sustainable healthcare systems that provide high-quality care. This article explores ethical issues pertinent to de-adoption including the underpinnings of beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy.
© 2016 The Canadian College of Health Leaders.

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27498394     DOI： 10.1177/0840470416646632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Manage Forum        ISSN： 0840-4704


  9 in total

Review 1.  Better Service by Doing Less: Introducing De-implementation Research in HIV.

Authors:  Virginia R McKay; Emmanuel K Tetteh; Miranda J Reid; Lucy M Ingaiza
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  A Health Systems Ethical Framework for De-implementation in Health Care.

Authors:  Alison S Baskin; Ton Wang; Jacquelyn Miller; Reshma Jagsi; Eve A Kerr; Lesly A Dossett
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Classification schemes for knowledge translation interventions: a practical resource for researchers.

Authors:  Susan E Slaughter; Gabrielle L Zimmermann; Megan Nuspl; Heather M Hanson; Lauren Albrecht; Rosmin Esmail; Khara Sauro; Amanda S Newton; Maoliosa Donald; Michele P Dyson; Denise Thomson; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants.

Authors:  Wynne E Norton; Amy E Kennedy; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De-implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings.

Authors:  Virginia R McKay; Alexandra B Morshed; Ross C Brownson; Enola K Proctor; Beth Prusaczyk
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2018-07-03

6.  Active change interventions to de-implement low-value healthcare practices: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Gillian Parker; Tim Rappon; Whitney Berta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Broad Medical Uncertainty and the ethical obligation for openness.

Authors:  Rebecca C H Brown; Mícheál de Barra; Brian D Earp
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  Factors influencing current low-value follow-up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de-adoption: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S van Egmond; M Wakkee; A van Rengen; M T Bastiaens; T Nijsten; M Lugtenberg
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 9.  Using theories and frameworks to understand how to reduce low-value healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Gillian Parker; Nida Shahid; Tim Rappon; Monika Kastner; Karen Born; Whitney Berta
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 7.327
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.