Literature DB >> 27498314

In vitro models of medulloblastoma: Choosing the right tool for the job.

Delyan P Ivanov1, Beth Coyle2, David A Walker3, Anna M Grabowska4.   

Abstract

The recently-defined four molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma have required updating of our understanding of in vitro models to include molecular classification and risk stratification features from clinical practice. This review seeks to build a more comprehensive picture of the in vitro systems available for modelling medulloblastoma. The subtype classification and molecular characterisation for over 40 medulloblastoma cell-lines has been compiled, making it possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses in current model systems. Less than half (18/44) of established medulloblastoma cell-lines have been subgrouped. The majority of the subgrouped cell-lines (11/18) are Group 3 with MYC-amplification. SHH cell-lines are the next most common (4/18), half of which exhibit TP53 mutation. WNT and Group 4 subgroups, accounting for 50% of patients, remain underrepresented with 1 and 2 cell-lines respectively. In vitro modelling relies not only on incorporating appropriate tumour cells, but also on using systems with the relevant tissue architecture and phenotype as well as normal tissues. Novel ways of improving the clinical relevance of in vitro models are reviewed, focusing on 3D cell culture, extracellular matrix, co-cultures with normal cells and organotypic slices. This paper champions the establishment of a collaborative online-database and linked cell-bank to catalyse preclinical medulloblastoma research.
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor children; Cell line molecular subgroups; Neurotoxicity testing; Normal brain co-culture; Three-dimensional cell culture; WNT SHH group 3 group 4

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27498314     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biotechnol        ISSN: 0168-1656            Impact factor:   3.307


  73 in total

1.  Synergistic anti-cancer effects of epigenetic drugs on medulloblastoma cells.

Authors:  Juan Yuan; Núria Llamas Luceño; Bjoern Sander; Monika M Golas
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Suppression of STAT3 NH2 -terminal domain chemosensitizes medulloblastoma cells by activation of protein inhibitor of activated STAT3 via de-repression by microRNA-21.

Authors:  Sutapa Ray; Don W Coulter; Shawn D Gray; Jason A Sughroue; Shrabasti Roychoudhury; Erin M McIntyre; Nagendra K Chaturvedi; Kishor K Bhakat; Shantaram S Joshi; Timothy R McGuire; John G Sharp
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.784

3.  Biological characterization of the UW402, UW473, ONS-76 and DAOY pediatric medulloblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Ricardo Bonfim-Silva; Karina Bezerra Salomão; Thais Valéria Costa de Andrade Pimentel; Camila Cristina Branquinho de Oliveira Menezes; Patrícia Vianna Bonini Palma; Aparecida Maria Fontes
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Valproic acid treatment response in vitro is determined by TP53 status in medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Bruna Mascaro-Cordeiro; Indhira Dias Oliveira; Francine Tesser-Gamba; Lorena Favaro Pavon; Nasjla Saba-Silva; Sergio Cavalheiro; Patrícia Dastoli; Silvia Regina Caminada Toledo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Proceedings of the Comprehensive Oncology Network Evaluating Rare CNS Tumors (NCI-CONNECT) Adult Medulloblastoma Workshop.

Authors:  Marta Penas-Prado; Brett J Theeler; Brittany Cordeiro; Ira J Dunkel; Peter Hau; Anita Mahajan; Giles W Robinson; Nicole Willmarth; Orwa Aboud; Kenneth Aldape; John A Butman; Amar Gajjar; William Kelly; Ganesh Rao; Margarita Raygada; Christine Siegel; Carlos G Romo; Terri S Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-08-17

6.  Systems biology-based drug repositioning identifies digoxin as a potential therapy for groups 3 and 4 medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Sarah Garrett Injac; Kemi Cui; Frank Braun; Qi Lin; Yuchen Du; Huiyuan Zhang; Mari Kogiso; Holly Lindsay; Sibo Zhao; Patricia Baxter; Adesina Adekunle; Tsz-Kwong Man; Hong Zhao; Xiao-Nan Li; Ching C Lau; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  BAI1 Suppresses Medulloblastoma Formation by Protecting p53 from Mdm2-Mediated Degradation.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Satoru Osuka; Zhaobin Zhang; Zachery R Reichert; Liquan Yang; Yonehiro Kanemura; Ying Jiang; Shuo You; Hanwen Zhang; Narra S Devi; Debanjan Bhattacharya; Shingo Takano; G Yancey Gillespie; Tobey Macdonald; Chalet Tan; Ryo Nishikawa; William G Nelson; Jeffrey J Olson; Erwin G Van Meir
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Molecular characterization of Wnt pathway and function of β-catenin overexpression in medulloblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Lenisa Geron; Karina Bezerra Salomão; Kleiton Silva Borges; Augusto Faria Andrade; Carolina Alves Pereira Corrêa; Carlos Alberto Scrideli; Luiz Gonzaga Tone
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Perillyl alcohol for pediatric TP53- and RAS-mutated SHH-medulloblastoma: an in vitro and in vivo translational pre-clinical study.

Authors:  Marcela de Oliveira Silva; Graziella Ribeiro de Sousa; Sarah Capelupe Simões; Patrícia Nicolucci; Edwin Tamashiro; Fabiano Saggioro; Ricardo Santos de Oliveira; María Sol Brassesco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 10.  Drug Repurposing in Medulloblastoma: Challenges and Recommendations.

Authors:  Hussein Hammoud; Zahraa Saker; Hayat Harati; Youssef Fares; Hisham F Bahmad; Sanaa Nabha
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.