| Literature DB >> 27498294 |
Stijn A A Massar1, Julian Lim1, Karen Sasmita1, Michael W L Chee2.
Abstract
Maintaining sustained attention over time is an effortful process limited by finite cognitive resources. Recent theories describe the role of motivation in the allocation of such resources as a decision process: the costs of effortful performance are weighed against its gains. We examined this hypothesis by combining methods from attention research and decision neuroscience. Participants first performed a sustained attention task at different levels of reward. They then performed a reward-discounting task, measuring the subjective costs of performance. Results demonstrated that higher rewards led to improved performance (Exp 1-3), and enhanced attentional effort (i.e. pupil diameter; Exp 2 & 3). Moreover, discounting curves constructed from the choice task indicated that subjects devalued rewards that came at the cost of staying vigilant for a longer duration (Exp 1 & 2). Motivation can thus boost sustained attention through increased effort, while sustained performance is regarded as a cost against which rewards are discounted.Entities:
Keywords: Decision making; Effort-discounting; Pupillometry; Reward motivation; Sustained attention
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27498294 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Psychol ISSN: 0301-0511 Impact factor: 3.251