Literature DB >> 27497675

Early decision framework for integrating sustainable risk management for complex remediation sites: Drivers, barriers, and performance metrics.

Melissa A Harclerode1, Tamzen W Macbeth2, Michael E Miller3, Christopher J Gurr4, Teri S Myers5.   

Abstract

As the environmental remediation industry matures, remaining sites often have significant underlying technical challenges and financial constraints. More often than not, significant remediation efforts at these "complex" sites have not achieved stringent, promulgated cleanup goals. Decisions then have to be made about whether and how to commit additional resources towards achieving those goals, which are often not achievable nor required to protect receptors. Guidance on cleanup approaches focused on evaluating and managing site-specific conditions and risks, rather than uniformly meeting contaminant cleanup criteria in all media, is available to aid in this decision. Although these risk-based cleanup approaches, such as alternative endpoints and adaptive management strategies, have been developed, they are under-utilized due to environmental, socio-economic, and risk perception barriers. Also, these approaches are usually implemented late in the project life cycle after unsuccessful remedial attempts to achieve stringent cleanup criteria. In this article, we address these barriers by developing an early decision framework to identify if site characteristics support sustainable risk management, and develop performance metrics and tools to evaluate and implement successful risk-based cleanup approaches. In addition, we address uncertainty and risk perception challenges by aligning risk-based cleanup approaches with the concepts of risk management and sustainable remediation. This approach was developed in the context of lessons learned from implementing remediation at complex sites, but as a framework can, and should, be applied to all sites undergoing remediation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex site remediation; Risk assessment; Risk management; Risk perception; Risk-based cleanup; Sustainable remediation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497675     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; David S Kosson; Kevin G Brown; Jennifer Salisbury; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Combining ecological, eco-cultural, and environmental justice parameters to create Eco-EJ indicators to monitor cultural and environmental justices for diverse communities around contaminated sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; David S Kosson; Kevin G Brown; Jennifer Salisbury; Michael Greenberg; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Prediction Performance Comparison of Risk Management and Control Mode in Regional Sites Based on Decision Tree and Neural Network.

Authors:  Wenhui Zhu; Jun He; Hongzhen Zhang; Liang Cheng; Xintong Yang; Xiahui Wang; Guohua Ji
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.