Literature DB >> 27497605

Reliability and interexaminer agreement for induced tropia test: is normal always normal?

Kadriye Erkan Turan1, Hande Taylan Sekeroglu2, Sevilay Karahan3, Ali Sefik Sanac2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the fixation preference testing with 10 and 20 diopter prisms (Δ) in children without strabismus in order to extrapolate its utility to preverbal children and to determine interexaminer agreement. Fourty children (24 girls, 16 boys) aged between 5 and 16 years with normal ophthalmological examination except refractive errors were included in the study. The visual acuity, refractive errors, and orthoptic findings were recorded. The base-down prism fixation test was performed by two experienced examiners with 10Δ and 20Δ. The presence of corrective movement was recorded as positive result separately for each eye. Best-corrected visual acuity was 1.0 bilaterally for all patients. All patients had binocular single vision and stereopsis. First examiner noted bilateral fixation movement in 65 % patients with 10Δ and in 57.5 % with 20Δ, second examiner in 50 % with 10Δ, and in 37.5 % with 20Δ. Interexaminer agreement was 42.5 % for 10Δ and 54.5 % for 20Δ (p < 0.01). Both examiners observed the fixation movement to be less frequent in older children. The fixation movement can be absent or seen asymmetrically even in children with equal visual acuity and binocular vision. The rate of fixation movement seemed to be reduced with age possibly due to increased concentration and cooperation of the child. In addition, there was a remarkable interexaminer variability in both tests. It should be borne in mind that the findings of prism-guided fixation preference tests may be misleading in preverbal children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Base-down prism; Fixation preference; Induced tropia test

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497605     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0312-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  7 in total

1.  Tests of fixation preference for amblyopia.

Authors:  David K Wallace
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  2005

2.  The base-to-base induced-tropia prism test for detection of amblyopia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Konstandina Koklanis; Thong Le; Zoran Georgievski
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  10-Diopter fixation test for amblyopia.

Authors:  K W Wright; F Walonker; P Edelman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-07

4.  Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Joanne Katz; Michael X Repka; Lydia Giordano; Josephine Ibironke; Patricia Hawse; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia.

Authors:  K W Wright; P M Edelman; F Walonker; S Yiu
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-04

6.  Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Erin Song; Jesse Lin; Mark Borchert; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Diagnosis of amblyopia using the 10-diopter fixation test: a proposed modification for patients with unilateral ptosis.

Authors:  K W Whittaker; E O'Flynn; R M Manners
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.402

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.