| Literature DB >> 27497527 |
Allison Tong1, Braden Manns2, Brenda Hemmelgarn2, David C Wheeler3, Nicole Evangelidis4, Peter Tugwell5, Sally Crowe6, Wim Van Biesen7, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer8, Donal O'Donoghue9, Helen Tam-Tham2, Jenny I Shen10, Jule Pinter4, Nicholas Larkins4, Sajeda Youssouf9, Sreedhar Mandayam8, Angela Ju4, Jonathan C Craig4.
Abstract
Evidence-informed decision making in clinical care and policy in nephrology is undermined by trials that selectively report a large number of heterogeneous outcomes, many of which are not patient centered. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Initiative convened an international consensus workshop on November 7, 2015, to discuss the identification and implementation of a potential core outcome set for all trials in hemodialysis. The purpose of this article is to report qualitative analyses of the workshop discussions, describing the key aspects to consider when establishing core outcomes in trials involving patients on hemodialysis therapy. Key stakeholders including 8 patients/caregivers and 47 health professionals (nephrologists, policymakers, industry, and researchers) attended the workshop. Attendees suggested that identifying core outcomes required equitable stakeholder engagement to ensure relevance across patient populations, flexibility to consider evolving priorities over time, deconstruction of language and meaning for conceptual consistency and clarity, understanding of potential overlap and associations between outcomes, and an assessment of applicability to the range of interventions in hemodialysis. For implementation, they proposed that core outcomes must have simple, inexpensive, and validated outcome measures that could be used in clinical care (quality indicators) and trials (including pragmatic trials) and endorsement by regulatory agencies. Integrating these recommendations may foster acceptance and optimize the uptake and translation of core outcomes in hemodialysis, leading to more informative research, for better treatment and improved patient outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical research; consensus; core outcome set; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); hemodialysis; nephrology research; outcomes; patient-centered care; research priorities; research quality; standardized reporting; workshop report
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27497527 PMCID: PMC5369351 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Kidney Dis ISSN: 0272-6386 Impact factor: 8.860