Literature DB >> 27497355

Two-year clinical outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in complex coronary artery disease patients stratified by SYNTAX score and ABSORB II study enrolment criteria.

Robin P Kraak1, Maik J Grundeken, Mariëlla E Hassell, Joëlle Elias, Karel T Koch, José P Henriques, Jan J Piek, Jan Baan, Marije M Vis, Jan G P Tijssen, Robbert J de Winter, Joanna J Wykrzykowska.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study presents the two-year clinical outcomes of the Amsterdam ABSORB registry stratified by lesion and patient characteristics complexity (SYNTAX score and ABSORB II study enrolment criteria). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients treated with BVS were included in this prospective registry and stratified according to the ABSORB II trial inclusion and exclusion criteria and the SYNTAX score. The registry comprises 135 patients (59±11 years, 73% male, 18% diabetic) with 159 lesions. Median follow-up duration was 774 days (742-829). Median SYNTAX score was 11.5 (Q1-Q3: 6-17.5). Two-year event rates were cardiac death 0.7%, MI 5.3%, TVR 13.6%, TLR 11.4%, definite ST 3.0% and TVF 14.4%, respectively. Stratified analyses showed a significantly higher revascularisation rate in patients not meeting ABSORB II criteria (TVR: 2.3% vs. 19.2%, p=0.010, and TLR: 2.3% vs. 15.8%, p=0.025) and patients with SYNTAX score ≥11.5 (TVR: 4.8% vs. 21.8%, p=0.006, and TLR: 3.2% vs. 17.4%, p=0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Absorb BVS in patients meeting the ABSORB II trial inclusion criteria or those with low SYNTAX scores is associated with acceptable clinical outcomes at two-year follow-up. Patients with more complex characteristics have significantly higher revascularisation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497355     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I5A95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  5 in total

1.  How far have we come with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, and where should we go?

Authors:  Jeehoon Kang; Kyung Woo Park; Hyo Soo Kim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

2.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for complex coronary anatomies: "Icarus' flight" for interventional cardiologists?

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Adnan Kastrati; Massimiliano Fusaro
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

3.  Bioresorbable scaffolds: should we stay simple or go complex?

Authors:  Luis Ortega-Paz; Salvatore Brugaletta; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Long-term outcome of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Alberto Polimeni; Remzi Anadol; Thomas Münzel; Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Authors:  Mateusz P Jeżewski; Michał J Kubisa; Ceren Eyileten; Salvatore De Rosa; Günter Christ; Maciej Lesiak; Ciro Indolfi; Aurel Toma; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Marek Postuła
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.