P Virtanen1, A Siukola1, L Lipiäinen2, V Liukkonen1, J Pentti3, J Vahtera4. 1. School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014 University of Tampere, Finland. 2. School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere, 33014 University of Tampere, Finland. 3. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 20520 Turku, Finland. 4. Department of Public Health, University of Turku, 20014 University of Turku, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compared with the public sector, the private sector is more susceptible to changes in the economic environment and associated threats of downsizing, outsourcing and transfers of production. This might be assumed to be associated with more restrictive sickness absence practices. AIMS: To investigate whether this difference is reflected in higher sickness absence rates in the public sector and to explore the potential of trajectory analysis in researching such absences. METHODS: The sample consisted of industrial and municipal employees. Latent groups of differential sickness absence during a 6-year study period were searched with a two-response trajectory analysis that jointly captured the spells and the days. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to assess associations of the labour market sector with the set of trajectories obtained. RESULTS: There were 2207 industrial and 3477 municipal employees in the study group. The analysis assigned the employees to three trajectory groups, the 'low-level', 'middle-range' and 'high-range' groups. The relative risk ratios for the middle-range and the high-range trajectories of public sector employees were not higher after controlling for age, gender and occupational. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the labour market sector was not a major independent determinant of sickness absence practices. Trajectory analysis can be recommended as a way to determine differential absence practices. The trajectory approach might help occupational health services to identify more accurately the employees who need support to maintain their work ability.
BACKGROUND: Compared with the public sector, the private sector is more susceptible to changes in the economic environment and associated threats of downsizing, outsourcing and transfers of production. This might be assumed to be associated with more restrictive sickness absence practices. AIMS: To investigate whether this difference is reflected in higher sickness absence rates in the public sector and to explore the potential of trajectory analysis in researching such absences. METHODS: The sample consisted of industrial and municipal employees. Latent groups of differential sickness absence during a 6-year study period were searched with a two-response trajectory analysis that jointly captured the spells and the days. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to assess associations of the labour market sector with the set of trajectories obtained. RESULTS: There were 2207 industrial and 3477 municipal employees in the study group. The analysis assigned the employees to three trajectory groups, the 'low-level', 'middle-range' and 'high-range' groups. The relative risk ratios for the middle-range and the high-range trajectories of public sector employees were not higher after controlling for age, gender and occupational. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the labour market sector was not a major independent determinant of sickness absence practices. Trajectory analysis can be recommended as a way to determine differential absence practices. The trajectory approach might help occupational health services to identify more accurately the employees who need support to maintain their work ability.
Authors: Krisztina D László; Pia Svedberg; Petra Lindfors; Ulrik Lidwall; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Päivi Leino-Arjas; Jorma Seitsamo; Clas-Håkan Nygård; Prakash K C; Subas Neupane Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 3.390