Laurent Audigé1, Matthias Flury2, Andreas M Müller3, Holger Durchholz2. 1. Research and Development Department, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland; Upper Extremities Department, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: laurent.audige@kws.ch. 2. Upper Extremities Department, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland. 3. Research and Development Department, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The literature does not consistently report on complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Valid comparison of the occurrence of complications between ARCR interventions requires standardization. This project was implemented to define a core set of negative (untoward) events associated with ARCR along with their terms and definitions, which should be systematically documented and reported in routine care and clinical research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Delphi consensus process was applied. An international panel of experienced shoulder surgeons was nominated through professional societies and personal contacts. On the basis of a systematic review of terms and definitions, an organized list of relevant events associated with ARCR was developed and reviewed by panel members. Between each survey, all comments and suggestions were considered to revise the proposed core set, including local event groups along with definitions, specifications, and timing of occurrence. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds agreement. RESULTS: Three successive online surveys were implemented involving 84 surgeons. Consensus with over 86% agreement was reached for a core list of local events including 3 intraoperative event groups (device, osteochondral, and soft tissue) and 9 postoperative event groups (device, osteochondral, pain, rotator cuff, surgical-site infection, peripheral neurologic, vascular, superficial soft tissue, and deep soft tissue). Experts agreed on a period for documentation of each event or group of events ranging from 3 to 24 months after ARCR. CONCLUSION: A structured core set of local events associated with ARCR has been developed by international consensus. Further evaluation and validation in the context of clinical studies are required.
BACKGROUND: The literature does not consistently report on complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Valid comparison of the occurrence of complications between ARCR interventions requires standardization. This project was implemented to define a core set of negative (untoward) events associated with ARCR along with their terms and definitions, which should be systematically documented and reported in routine care and clinical research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Delphi consensus process was applied. An international panel of experienced shoulder surgeons was nominated through professional societies and personal contacts. On the basis of a systematic review of terms and definitions, an organized list of relevant events associated with ARCR was developed and reviewed by panel members. Between each survey, all comments and suggestions were considered to revise the proposed core set, including local event groups along with definitions, specifications, and timing of occurrence. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds agreement. RESULTS: Three successive online surveys were implemented involving 84 surgeons. Consensus with over 86% agreement was reached for a core list of local events including 3 intraoperative event groups (device, osteochondral, and soft tissue) and 9 postoperative event groups (device, osteochondral, pain, rotator cuff, surgical-site infection, peripheral neurologic, vascular, superficial soft tissue, and deep soft tissue). Experts agreed on a period for documentation of each event or group of events ranging from 3 to 24 months after ARCR. CONCLUSION: A structured core set of local events associated with ARCR has been developed by international consensus. Further evaluation and validation in the context of clinical studies are required.
Authors: Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Michael S Gruber; Bernhard Kriegleder; Roman C Ostermann; Brenda Laky; Werner Anderl Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Vikas Khanduja; Nicholas Darby; John O'Donnell; Nicolas Bonin; Marc R Safran Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Adam Schumaier; David Kovacevic; Christopher Schmidt; Andrew Green; Andrew Rokito; Charles Jobin; Ed Yian; Frances Cuomo; Jason Koh; Mohit Gilotra; Miguel Ramirez; Matthew Williams; Robert Burks; Rodney Stanley; Samer Hasan; Scott Paxton; Syed Hasan; Wesley Nottage; William Levine; Uma Srikumaran; Brian Grawe Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Kiran J Agarwal-Harding; Linda Chokotho; Sven Young; Nyengo Mkandawire; Mabvuto Chawinga; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laurent Audigé; Heiner C C Bucher; Soheila Aghlmandi; Thomas Stojanov; David Schwappach; Sabina Hunziker; Christian Candrian; Gregory Cunningham; Holger Durchholz; Karim Eid; Matthias Flury; Bernhard Jost; Alexandre Lädermann; Beat Kaspar Moor; Philipp Moroder; Claudio Rosso; Michael Schär; Markus Scheibel; Christophe Spormann; Thomas Suter; Karl Wieser; Matthias Zumstein; Andreas M Müller Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 2.692